The philosophical discussions of justice after Plato have not been the most fruitful bases for
radical social thought.
Not exact matches
About Mindset
Social Innovation Foundation Mindset Social Innovation Foundation is a private charitable Foundation based in Vancouver and founded by Alison Lawton that explores complex social problems that will only be solved by radical new ways of thinking and organ
Social Innovation Foundation Mindset
Social Innovation Foundation is a private charitable Foundation based in Vancouver and founded by Alison Lawton that explores complex social problems that will only be solved by radical new ways of thinking and organ
Social Innovation Foundation is a private charitable Foundation based in Vancouver and founded by Alison Lawton that explores complex
social problems that will only be solved by radical new ways of thinking and organ
social problems that will only be solved by
radical new ways of
thinking and organizing.
The magazines move from the strongly traditional viewpoint of Moody Monthly (a viewpoint carrying on the
social ethic of late nineteenth century American revivalism), through the moderately conservative stance of Christianity Today (a stance that seeks perhaps unconsciously to revive the
social activism of American fundamentalism prior to the repeal of Prohibition and the Scopes trail), to the socially liberal commitment of The Reformed Journal (a position seeking to be contemporary, and yet faithful to Calvin's
thought) and the socially
radical perspective of Sojourners (a perspective molded in the Anabaptist tradition).
A strong case has been made by F. J. E. Woodbridge that Plato not only does not seriously regard his «perfect state» as realizable, but that he means to make us see the error of imposing perfection too rigorously on human fallibility.3 Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward illustrates the utopia which becomes a persuasive call to
radical social reforms.4 It also illustrates one of the functions of utopian
thought as a medium of realistic criticism of the present.
According to Waldstein, the alternative in contemporary Protestant
social thought would be either
radical pacifism and anarchism in the Anabaptist tradition or the institutional gradualism of the Reformed tradition.
* As Tavis Smiley reports in his new book on Martin Luther King, Jr., the civil rights leader faced a major decline in popularity during his last few years, as many
thought his
social justice agenda too
radical.
Only when the minister gets very «
radical» about either doctrine or
social issues does serious protest arise, and even then there is a tendency to let the minister
think his own peculiar ideas so long as not many people are influenced by him.
But a body of newer work on the apostle — including, perhaps, as Hurtado notes, Wright's own new books (which I haven't had the chance to finish reading yet)-- reveals that Paul may, after all, look less like a liberal Westerner than the New Perspective has taught us to
think and more like a Christ - haunted figure whose
radical social practices arose directly from his pioneering, innovative
thinking about the identity and achievement of Jesus Christ.
If it does (and I
think it will) it will do so because it is not
radical enough — it does not sufficiently take into account the moral and spiritual forces in
social life.
I
think he was saying
radical liberal ends are best achieved through modernized
social democratic means... which may refer to democratic republicanism.
I personally don't
think they're necessarily opposed, but some interpretations of transhumanism require a huge and somewhat
radical social change, while most strands of conservatism are skeptical and / or opposed to sudden changes.
If there's a dealbreaker for audiences or commercially minded critics, it's the fact that the narrative tends to grow unwieldy and wanders non-linearly from a coming - of - age story to something much more complex and wider (and no doubt autobiographical) about how the post-war generation's
social upheaval and
radical thinking damaged the children of this era (of which Potter was clearly one).
Bringing deep learning and
social justice front and center of education requires
radical redefinitions of how we
think and act on learning, teaching, and the management of schools and education systems.
Remember, your feedback will help shape the future of
Radical Heights, so be sure to jump in on the forums or
social after you get hands - on with the update and let us know your
thoughts!
Conceived as a
radical think tank in the shape of an artist community, 18th Street supports artists from around the globe to imagine, research, and develop significant, meaningful new artworks and share them with the public to foster
radical imagination, empathy, and positive
social change.
The history of performance art as a manifestation of
radical shifts in
social thought and artistic practice is well documented in publications like Performance: Live Art Since 1960 (1998) by Roselee Goldberg, and her seminal book from 1979, Performance: Live Art 1909 to the Present.
Numerous scholars have explored the history of performance art as a manifestation of
radical shifts in
social thought and artistic practice, but only a small handful of publications have specifically focused on black performance art.
The history of performance art as a manifestation of
radical shifts in
social thought and artistic practice is well documented in publications like Out of Actions: Between Performance and the Object 1949 - 1979 by Paul Schimmel, Greenwich Village 1963: Avant - Garde Performance and the Effervescent Body by Sally Banes, as well as Performance: Live Art Since 1960 (1998) by RoseLee Goldberg and her seminal book from 1979, Performance: Live Art 1909 to the Present.
But it also sparks
thoughts of the turmoil of shifting identity and identification that any
radical social change may threaten or demand.
After 23 years of United Nations summits on climate change, the time has come for
radical thinking and
radical action — a
social movement with the power to demand a better future.
The rush to label any and all skeptics as either «liars for hire» or just plain ignorant dismisses the multitudes of honest,
thinking people who simply want to put the «science» of AGW under the microscope before blindly accepting what appears (to many) to be very
radical social and economic changes suggested as solutions.