Go for a morning jog over hilly terrain and the very landscape is likely to be the result of tectonic plate movements, powered deep under our feet in great part by
radioactive decays like that of the humble americium writ large.
Not exact matches
The false vacuum was unstable,
like a
radioactive atom waiting to
decay.
Krypton dating is much
like the more - heralded carbon - 14 dating technique that measures the
decay of a
radioactive isotope — which has constant and well - known
decay rates — and compares it to a stable isotope.
Like mainstream reactors, it is a «light water» design: The reactor is pressurized and filled with plain water that flows past the core, where the
radioactive decay of uranium - 235 generates intense heat.
In addition, if the melted nuclear fuel proves bad enough —
like Chernobyl's lethal mass of molten core known as the «elephant's foot» — it will have to be entombed for a number of years rather than removed, because of radiation risk from what is essentially a cooled shell of ceramic armor surrounding a highly
radioactive core that remains hot and is still undergoing
radioactive decay.
These measurements may also shed light on the proportion of
radioactive elements
like uranium and thorium inside the Moon, since their
decay produces heat and should increase the amount of heat radiated by the Moon, says Paul Spudis of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, US, who is developing radar instruments to fly on LRO and Chandrayaan - 1.
Like 14C dating, thermoluminescence is related to
radioactive decay..
Tangentially related to what James asked about geothermal power generation, you forgot to mention that
radioactive decay is the source of most geothermal energy, something
like 30 terawatts of flux these days according to my Google expertise.
There's weird crap happening far out in the solar system on Voyager and Pioneer spacecraft not being at the position and velocity where theory says they should be and radiothermal power supplies not
decaying at rates predicted upon what are axiomatically constant
radioactive decay rate of the isotopes
like it isn't really a constant at all.
I had the impression that Mike was claiming that he couldn't get the Earth to cool to 3K and I was simply trying to point out that if you include
radioactive decay, you wouldn't expect it to be 3K today in the absence of the Sun, and even if you ignore
radioactive decay, it would still take longer than the age of the Universe for an Earth -
like planet to cool to the temperature of the cosmic - background.
Place a moon -
like solid object (no or infinitesimal amounts of liquids and gases) with a small internal
radioactive -
decay source of thermal energy in space isolated from all other matter.