Sentences with phrase «raise more money then»

I was lucky enough to be invited to come teach you how to raise more money then -LSB-...]

«Senate Democrats raised more money then ever before and gave the campaigns the resources necessary to get out the vote and win.»

Not exact matches

Commercial real estate in Calgary was at the top of its market cycle between 2005 and 2008, but even then Concrete routinely raised more money than the buildings actually cost and failed to return the difference to investors.

The early smartwatch pioneers raised more money on Kickstarter than any prior campaign, then raised $ 59 million in venture funding, only to sell off assets to competitor Fitbit in 2016 in a deal reportedly valued between $ 34 million and $ 40 million.

This feature in a note says that if I gave you $ 25,000 and you sold the company without raising more money or before maturity (i.e. my note didn't convert) then I get $ 50,000 out of the proceeds of the sale.

You might then slow down your burn rate or raise more money.

The money raised is then used to build that new factory so it can make more widgets and gizmos and therefore grow the company.

If you accept this premise that there can be a meaningful difference based on method of origination of a token based on work vs. based on payment of money, then it raises more questions such as how would the above examples all be treated by the SEC on a facts and circumstances basis, and on down the rap sheet.

If Paul wants to let them opt out then either benefits for seniors will have to be cut, taxes will have to be raised, or the government will have to borrow more money.

Mate Walcott is not good enough for that TOP spot and that's a fact, also «If he Signs» indicates to me that he's really more about the money than the club, if he thinks he's worth 150 a week let him prove it and stay fit and score 30 goals a season first then ask for the raise.

But, don't feel like you have to stop there — if you want to raise more money, either through sponsorship, a bake sale or any other fundraising ideas then go right ahead!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

(The more money bet on a team raises the line if its a fave, and lowers it if its a dog) But, if you look and the higher % of bets are on the favorite, then that underdog has bets coming in on it from the sharps.

In 2004, the Howard Dean campaign made electoral history by harnessing the power of the internet to raise more than any other Democratic contender: more than $ 25m raised, largely in small - money donations averaging $ 80 — a marked contrast to the usual way of doing things, which involves raising titanic sums from rich people whom you then owe a lot of favours to, whether or not you take office.

«I think as long as they stuck to the idea that we've spent more money than we have and we can't raise taxes because that's going to drive jobs away and businesses away, then there's going to be a democratic — a small - d democratic — political process that makes better choices on spending.

But if the debt ceiling isn't raised, then the federal government is essentially stuck unable to pay its bills because it can't borrow more money.

Mr. Howe said he raised «a considerable amount» of money for Mr. Cuomo in 2010 and then volunteered in the 2014 campaign headquarters while raising still more money — all as he tried to secure state actions benefiting his clients.

Those were developed, in part, as a byproduct of previous alliances in which pharmaceutical companies payed for rights to develop would - be drugs discovered at Scripps, as well as through the more traditional approach of licensing early - stage compounds to startup companies that then raise money to develop them further.

One investor pulls out and then it's, «Well, we have to raise more money.»

This is why I don't understand doomsday articles this early in a consoles life span, The Wii u barely has any games worth buying yet, but as soon as it does then the sales will skyrocket, I like the Wii u, Now I just wish I had more money to buy more game's, Man I want Lego City, Think about it if Monster hunter can make the sale's raise this much what will happen when Super smash bros Wii u, Pikmin 3, Mario kart U, Yoshi's yarn, 3d Mario game, Zelda Wind waker HD, Zelda HD, possible Metroid game, possible Gamecube games coming to the VC, The VC being fully released with GBA games, What ever Retro is working on, Game and Wario looks fun I doubt it will be a console seller, And many other unannounced game's are released all the «Is the Wii u doomed?!»

But if your parents need to raise money to pay for your physical education teacher or librarian, then you will have to raise significant amounts of money, and that will mean bigger and more frequent events.

I got more money than I owed on my credit cards (raise) and then I paid them off and didn't rack them up again.

So when the Fed is ready to blow it all out into the economy, and presuming the economy is healthy enough to start taking it (more on this below), first they cut the IOER rate to 0 % (I would advocate charging banks money, but maybe you do it in steps), second they start raising short term interest rates (creates demand) and then once the economy is powering forward on private credit creation like normal then the deficit will start closing naturally as the economy grows and tax revenues increase and unemployment will come down (GDP gap closes).

Had you been making more money (compared to this $ 5000 limit) then either you'd have used less % of your available credit or you would've gotten your limits raised by asking your bank to re-evaluate your risk and increase the limit.

If labour prices rise, then there is more money to accomodate businesses to raise prices.

For example, if you receive a 10 % raise at your job, then you should accordingly pay 10 % more towards your mortgage payments, rather than spend the extra money on temping items such as a vacation.

So why not wait a couple of months, then have a big marketing push to get the share price up and then either issue fewer shares at a better price or issue the same number and raise a lot more money?

# 1 Increase in money supply One of the most common reasons for prices increases is that the government raises our money supply or releases more currency in circulation, which then cause businesses to increase prices to maintain the same value for their products.

So instead of raising $ 300,000 on a deal, I could bring in a lender at a reasonable rate for hard money, and then only have to raise 50k or bring in the 50k myself, so I'm making a little more cash.

It may have raised more money than Happy Hell, but its backers are even less active, the last comment coming January 8, and then May 8, 2016 before that.

But as I think about it more, I realize that when organic really pays is when this money — the very money we raised the other night — goes to fund new research that then gets into the hands of the people who really need it, such as a mom who learns that feeding their children organic foods can reduce their dietary pesticide exposure by 97 percent, and then makes the immediate switch to organic baby food.

If you sell [tokens] to raise money to build a profitable business by promising that the [tokens] will become more valuable as your business grows, then you are selling what?

The most common ones in the cryptocurrency investment space are high yield investment schemes (HYIPs), which promise high daily or weekly returns but are nothing more than Ponzi schemes and fraudulent initial coin offerings, where the perpetrators raise funds for a fictitious blockchain project and then disappear with the money as it was the case with Confido.

Your idea of raising the deductible as your account grows then increasing contributions to that account as you save more money is an excellent idea.

They then also have the choice to figure out how to implement that strategy just as we do (raising money, using their own, taking out a loan, etc.) Wanting to sue you sounds more like an emotional reaction to what they felt they should have done but didn't have the commitment to completing.

If you can afford to pay more upfront if something happens to your home, then raising your deductible can save you a considerable amount of money on your monthly premiums.