I'm just a chemist who only understood half your post, but it seems obvious that if you raise atmospheric temperatures faster than
you raise oceanic temperatures, relative humidity will fall.
Not exact matches
It was therefore easily rebutted when I wrote your «totally unsuitable» is contradicted by three papers: Arrhenius's 1896 paper proposing a logarithmic dependence of surface
temperature on CO2, Hansen et al's 1985 paper pointing out that the time needed to warm the
oceanic mixed layer would delay the impact of global warming, and Hofmann et al's 2009 paper modeling the dependence of CO2 on time as a
raised exponential.
I should also have given a more complete list of the problems with your objections: in this case your «totally unsuitable» is contradicted by three papers: Arrhenius's 1896 paper proposing a logarithmic dependence of surface
temperature on CO2, Hansen et al's 1985 paper pointing out that the time needed to warm the
oceanic mixed layer would delay the impact of global warming, and Hofmann et al's 2009 paper modeling the dependence of CO2 on time as a
raised exponential.