«The fact that to address inconsistency the RSC is saying they have to plan lessons and mark in the same way when there is no evidence that will
raise standards of achievement is astounding.
«Formative assessment is an essential component,» they wrote, and its development can
raise standards of achievement.
While «having high state standards makes a big difference to underprivileged people,» as Christopher Cerf put it, common standards might be set too low and so, contrary to what the PEPG report showed, may not serve to
raise standards of achievement when U.S. students are compared to their peers in high - achieving countries.
The pupil premium will be used to provide additional educational support to improve the progress and to
raise the standard of achievement for these pupils.
Not exact matches
«There is no evidence to show that the free schools model
raises standards of education or that it will narrow the
achievement gap between pupils from different ethnic groups.
His
achievements are impressive, but Añel acknowledges that he is failing to keep up his
standards in one aspect
of his life:
raising bonsai trees, which he does for a hobby.
Our results indicate that, on average, New York City's charter schools
raise their 3rd through 8th graders» math
achievement by 0.09
of a
standard score and reading
achievement by 0.04
of a
standard score, compared with what would have happened had they remained in traditional public schools (see Figure 3).
A commonly proposed strategy for
raising achievement levels in schools is to specify high expectations or «
standards»
of student performance and to hold students, teachers and schools accountable for achieving those
standards.
This strategy should
raise their standardized test scores, since researchers estimate that «85 percent
of achievement test scores are based on the vocabulary
of the
standards.»
School financing policies should be driven by an analysis
of what it costs to
raise the bar and close the gap in student
achievement, bringing teaching and learning opportunities in all schools up to a high
standard.
The lack
of relationship between the judged quality
of state
standards and student
achievement should
raise a number
of concerns for this Council.
While necessary and appealing, this drive toward higher
standards raises justifiable concern: Are schools promoting academic excellence for those who already have a competitive advantage, while turning away from the far more difficult task
of fostering
achievement among those who do not?
By this perspective, any education strategy that in a single year can
raise average
achievement of a large aggregate
of students by one full
standard deviation must be taken very seriously.
The development
of academic
standards, an important step toward
raising student
achievement, could open up states to lawsuits from groups
of students struggling to meet the
standards or from districts with large numbers
of such students.
Finally, in the latter half
of this century, as issues
of competition, comparison, and self - esteem were
raised, some elementary schools began to replace the letter grade report card with one featuring teacher comments and individualized assessment, in which students were evaluated according to
standards that reflected their
achievement in relation to their own effort and ability.
For all
of the talk about «
raising standards» and implementing «high stakes testing,» the United States is an outlier among developed nations when it comes to holding students themselves to account, and linking real - world consequences to academic
achievement or the lack thereof.
And is it
raising the
standards and performance
of the teaching profession and the
achievement of students?
Collaborative teaching, a resourceful approach to main streaming, is a keystone
of this school's plan to
raise the
achievement of special education students and move them into the era
of state
standards - based education.
The federal initiative uses the lure
of grants to encourage school districts to
raise standards, make better use
of data to track student
achievement, and take more forceful steps to intervene in failing schools.
During his six year tenure, the district
raised student
achievement by elevating academic
standards, aligning the curriculum and focusing on principal leadership and teachers» quality
of instruction.
«We want to challenge everyone — parents, teachers, school administrators — to
raise standards, by having the best teachers and principals, by tying student
achievement to assessments
of teachers, by making sure there is a focus on low - performing schools,» Obama said in a statement released by the White House on Monday.
One study, by Tom Loveless
of the Brookings Institution, predicted that the
standards would have little or no effect on academic
achievement; he noted that «from 2003 to 2009, states with terrific
standards raised their National Assessment
of Educational Progress scores by roughly the same margin as states with awful ones.»
When asked what the bigger priority for schools should be, 80 percent
of black parents chose
raising academic
standards and
achievement, according to the survey by Public Agenda, a nonpartisan public - opinion research firm in New York City.
Decades
of research on effective schools conclusively demonstrates that setting high
standards and expectations for all children, but especially those most at - risk
of academic failure, creates a more positive, inclusive school culture and
raises their level
of achievement.
Now a new study has found that highly effective principals
raise the
achievement of a typical student in their schools by between 0.05 and 0.21
standard deviations, the equivalent
of between two and seven months
of additional learning each school year.
If this latter hypothesis should ever be proven correct, it would testify to the efficacy
of a
standards - based strategy for
raising student
achievement.
Bellwether's report focused on the law's requirements for holding schools accountable: whether the state sets high academic
standards, how it will use federal money to identify and
raise achievement for the lowest - performing 5 percent
of schools and the lowest - performing groups
of students in all schools.
If the
achievement criterion is
raised to «proficient,» then 87 %
of grade 4 students who are eligible for free / reduced lunch fall below that
standard.
While Ofsted and the other levers
of accountability have played an important part in
raising standards, these
achievements are down to the fact we have the best generation
of leaders working in our comprehensive schools, leading a very fine cohort
of teachers.
It's curious that the draft K - 12 Common Core State
Standards appear to be trying to do the exact opposite — i.e.,
raise standards rather than aim their
standards at the bottom
of the
achievement scale.
Specifically, they say, «The research literature over the last quarter century has consistently supported the notion that having high expectations for all, including clear and public
standards, is one key to closing the
achievement gap between advantaged and less advantaged students and for
raising the overall
achievement of all students.
At the core
of these efforts is a call to rethink the practice
of teaching in ways that would
raise standards, increase student
achievement, reshape curricula, and restructure the way schools operate.
Every Child Counts aims to help schools to
raise achievement of children who have fallen behind in mathematics and
raise standards for all children.
High expectations for all, including clear and public
standards, is one key to closing the
achievement gap between advantaged and less advantaged students and for
raising the overall
achievement of all students.
NCSECS advocated and helped influence the law including a provision
raising the bar a bit higher to ensure high
standards for special education students by limiting their participation in tests based on alternate (lower) academic
achievement standards to 1 %
of students tested (and not just limiting the reporting
of their scores on such tests, as was done under NCLB).
A proven track record
of raising standards of teaching and learning, leading to improved
achievement and attainment;
Despite the unpopularity
of Common Core in some circles, the simple truth is that the
standards are more rigorous,
raise expectations and student
achievement, and provide a clearer set
of standards than the North Carolina
Standard Course
of Study that was in place prior to their adoption.
«CCSA has led the way for increased accountability by
raising standards that value academic rigor, while also giving schools credit for academic growth, and for taking on the challenge
of serving traditionally disadvantaged students,» said Elizabeth Robitaille, senior vice president
of Achievement and Performance Management, CCSA.
The plans, introduced in the Education and Adoption Bill, are aimed at
raising standards in hundreds
of schools that are achieving adequate exam results, but where the government believes
achievement could be much higher.
She suggests that
raising student
achievement over time must not simply be a function
of high
standards but also must include a commitment to supporting students and families outside
of school.
Articulating a handful
of clear and high
standards is widely seen as necessary but not sufficient to
raise the
achievement of American students.
Experience has taught us that state
standards and tests are inadequate to the tough task
of raising student
achievement.
By helping BIE teachers achieve the highest professional
standard and become leaders in the classroom, we are able
raise the quality
of teaching in BIE schools and enhance student learning and
achievement.»
The new
standards, it is hoped, will
raise the
achievement of U.S. students by focusing on fewer topics in greater depth.
There is abundant evidence that when we
raise the
standards in classrooms,
achievement rises for all levels
of students, not just the brightest.
She argues that without fundamental change in government and business policies and the redirection
of major resources back into the schools and the communities they serve, urban schools are consigned to failure, and no effort at
raising standards, improving teaching, or boosting
achievement can occur.
In addition,
standards for teacher education programs were strengthened, and states like Connecticut and North Carolina, which undertook large - scale, comprehensive reforms, turned shortages into surpluses
of much better trained, better supported, and better (and more equitably) paid teachers, while substantially
raising achievement and reducing
achievement gaps.
And children in 45 states and the District
of Columbia will for the first time follow a set
of common
standards aimed at
raising achievement, with a third - grader in Hawaii expected to know the same things as a third - grader in Maine.
For each year
of attendance in middle school, we estimate that Charter Schools
raise student
achievement.09 to.17
standard deviations in English Language Arts and.18 to.53
standard deviations in math relative to those attending traditional schools in the Boston Public Schools.
The effect is large: Finance reforms
raise achievement in the lowest - income school districts by about one - tenth
of a
standard deviation, closing about one - fifth
of the gap between high - and low - income districts.