Not exact matches
He was a co-author of a study that showed that teachers who helped
students raise standardized test scores had a lasting effect
on those
students» future incomes, as well as other lifelong outcomes.
But in the past decade, more and more big - name Democrats have split with the unions to support charter schools, tenure reform and accountability measures that hold teachers responsible for
raising students»
scores on standardized tests.
In recent years, however, the federal law known as No Child Left Behind has put pressure
on schools to
raise scores on the
standardized reading and math
tests given to
students starting around age 8.
Administrators quoted in the report explain that while Uncommon Schools have historically outperformed other schools that serve similar
student populations, the implementation of the CCSS has
raised the bar and fewer Uncommon
students are
scoring at proficient and advanced levels
on standardized tests.
In some of these programs like Relay, candidates are awarded degrees based
on their ability to
raise their
students»
standardized test scores, which perpetuates the idea that
test scores are the most important measure of learning, and encourages a narrowing of the curriculum to focus
on tested content.
The paper, by Raj Chetty and John N. Friedman of Harvard and Jonah E. Rockoff of Columbia, tracked 2.5 million
students over 20 years, and using a value added approach, found that teachers who help
students raise their
standardized test scores have a lasting positive effect
on those
students» lives beyond academics, including lower teenage - pregnancy rates, greater college matriculation and higher adult earnings.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Public School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, serving a low - income urban minority community, launched a concerted and successful campaign to
raise its
students» low math
scores on standardized tests.
I've previously posted about studies that have found that the laser - like focus
on raising student test scores often identifies teachers who are good at doing that, but those VAM - like measures tend to short - change educators who are good at developing Social Emotional or «non-cognitive skills» (see More Evidence Showing The Dangers Of Using High - Stakes Testing For Teacher Evaluation; Another Study Shows Limitations Of Standardized Tests For Teacher Evaluations; Study Finds Teachers Whose Students Achieve High Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Upda
test scores often identifies teachers who are good at doing that, but those VAM - like measures tend to short - change educators who are good at developing Social Emotional or «non-cognitive skills» (see More Evidence Showing The Dangers Of Using High - Stakes Testing For Teacher Evaluation; Another Study Shows Limitations Of Standardized Tests For Teacher Evaluations; Study Finds Teachers Whose Students Achieve High Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Up
scores often identifies teachers who are good at doing that, but those VAM - like measures tend to short - change educators who are good at developing Social Emotional or «non-cognitive skills» (see More Evidence Showing The Dangers Of Using High - Stakes
Testing For Teacher Evaluation; Another Study Shows Limitations Of
Standardized Tests For Teacher Evaluations; Study Finds Teachers Whose
Students Achieve High
Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Upda
Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Up
Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Update).