Sentences with phrase «raised more money if»

Perhaps even later Kickstarters like Kodomo no Jikan could have raised more money if DMI wasn't asking for $ 140 upfront for the entire physical version just two months after asking for $ 170 upfront for a previous complete manga campaign.

Not exact matches

If the company isn't «blowing up,» when the founder goes out to raise more money and the original VCs / Angels who invested don't lead or participate in the new round, it sends an very bad signal to other potential new investors.

If you burn the money up, go out and raise more money.

If a start - up went public, consistently operated at a profit, or was sold for more money than it raised, it was deemed successful for the purposes of the research.

If you count those contributions, Clinton has raised much more money from the industry than Obama had by mid-2012.

In your current field, you may get small raises over time, but if you need, or want, significantly more money, a career change is in order.

Listeners raise their hands and suggest ways that Pandora might outwit regulators; others volunteer to view more ads on their Pandora radio players if that will help the company make money.

Having said that, a lot of hobbyist investors will stop if the markets crash and that will make it more difficult to raise money for sure.

If you believe the outlook will make funding more difficult (in time and price) you owe it to yourself to keep your burn rate in check so you can last longer until you need money and either «grow into your valuation» or at least get through a period of time where raising capital is more difficult

This feature in a note says that if I gave you $ 25,000 and you sold the company without raising more money or before maturity (i.e. my note didn't convert) then I get $ 50,000 out of the proceeds of the sale.

It makes sense for Telegram to raise more private money if there is enough demand, multiple investors told The Verge.

How do our Seed investors make out if the startup doesn't raise any more money, does well, and gets acquired at a $ 3M valuation?

If you need to raise more money but are unable to do so at standard terms, will you accept less favorable terms or will you raise at a lower valuation?

Remember, if the government gives us a tax cut they'll still have to make up the budget shortfall somehow, chiefly by selling more bonds to American citizens (who happen to be the same people getting the tax cut) or foreigners (who will raise the money by selling us more of their goods and services, or buying less of ours).

The round, if launched, could also have a small «primary» component in which Coinbase raises more capital, though the company is not wanting for money.

So the more money you go and raise when you don't have any revenue yet, as people observe if they ever watched Dragons» Den or Shark Tank, is the more of the business you give up — because they say well, your business has no value.

«Yet Tesla needs to keep the narrative positive, as its options for any capital raise will likely be limited if it is raising [more money]-RSB- out of a position of weakness,» they noted.

If you accept this premise that there can be a meaningful difference based on method of origination of a token based on work vs. based on payment of money, then it raises more questions such as how would the above examples all be treated by the SEC on a facts and circumstances basis, and on down the rap sheet.

This may not be a great option however if you don't have many assets and / or it would cost a lot more money to raise your limits in order to qualify for an umbrella policy.

But it also means he has to sell the company to a bigger company or to shareholders for a lot more money than if he had raised less.

Puliatti said that after recent events, he and his co-founder are now more seriously considering not raising money from venture capitalists at all — and said that even if they did, he has decided that he won't «ever sit down» with Benchmark.

And had those 45,722 babies been born in 2009, there would be 45,722 more people that tax money would pay for to live, as clearly the parents were financially unable to support the estimated $ 10K per year cost to sufficiently raise a child if they were using Medicaid to pay for their heath care procedures.

now, basic economic theory tells us that when there is more money, it's not worth as much, if the minimum wage is raised, there will indeed be more money, and it will indeed be worth a lot less, because prices will skyrocket.

If Paul wants to let them opt out then either benefits for seniors will have to be cut, taxes will have to be raised, or the government will have to borrow more money.

If he tells me the job is worth more and he'd like a raise, is he trying to «steal» my money?

Mate Walcott is not good enough for that TOP spot and that's a fact, also «If he Signs» indicates to me that he's really more about the money than the club, if he thinks he's worth 150 a week let him prove it and stay fit and score 30 goals a season first then ask for the raisIf he Signs» indicates to me that he's really more about the money than the club, if he thinks he's worth 150 a week let him prove it and stay fit and score 30 goals a season first then ask for the raisif he thinks he's worth 150 a week let him prove it and stay fit and score 30 goals a season first then ask for the raise.

But they could be made realistic, if the price of the federal duck stamp was raised and the extra money used for more sanctuaries and stricter law enforcement to increase diving and puddle duck populations.

To keep the momentum going and to try and raise more money for Leukemia research and the Chuckstrong charity, one of the Colts Cheerleaders, Megan M., has pledged to shave her head if the Colts raise $ 10,000 by their November 25th game against the Bills.

Unless we raise more money through sales we may have 50 - 60M max in remaining budget (having spent 11M on Cech and get back around 2M through Podolski sale)-- if we spend 25M on a DM like Schederlein / Kondogbia / Carvalho now — we do not have any budget left for the World Class ST that we direly need more than the DM (Arteta played whole 2013 - 2014 where we have one of the best defensive record — people seem to have short memory — he would be ok as backup for another season) Wenger have done well in the last 2 seasons — bringing in Ozil when Real signed Bale, bringing in Sanchez when Barca signed Suarez.

But, don't feel like you have to stop there — if you want to raise more money, either through sponsorship, a bake sale or any other fundraising ideas then go right ahead!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

(The more money bet on a team raises the line if its a fave, and lowers it if its a dog) But, if you look and the higher % of bets are on the favorite, then that underdog has bets coming in on it from the sharps.

But if Sweetgreen's goal was to raise awareness about school nutrition (and not just garner a lot of publicity for its restaurants, which it did in spades), I fail to see what it accomplished by holding American schools up to an unrealistic international standard — whether the standard is unrealistic because it's inaccurate (Greece) or because the country in question invests far more time, money and effort than the United States in feeding its children (France.)

For instance, if you send more emails per month, you'll raise more money (it's impressive to see how much it matters to send more messages, btw).

If we wanted to reach our goals of registering new voters, raising more money and reaching out to more voters, we need to modernize our systems.

If a political entity has money, it can hire better consultants and attract more capable staff thus helping it raise even more money.

One of the organizations I worked for tested a new donation page to see if it was attracting more donors and raising more money.

«After voting to raise taxes on the average Central New York family by more than $ 5500 over the last two years, spending State money so recklessly that New York almost went bankrupt, and approving an increase for people on welfare even if they refuse to work, David Valesky should be spending his time apologizing to Central New Yorkers, not arranging for payoffs, which secure his ability to further damage our region and state.

But if he was initially turned off by a long campaign, Bayh now has a four - month sprint to November with more than $ 9.2 million sitting in his campaign account, so he won't have to spend as much time raising money.

In summary, if this discussion is confined purely to finances, could one person be found in each constituency who believes in voting reform enough to raise money for the cause, stand for it, and win more than 5 % of the votes (or risk losing # 500 trying)?

If the Government has money to spare, most of us would prefer income tax cuts to higher welfare benefits; and if the Government has to raise more money, there is a clear public preference for limiting welfare payments to big families, rather than imposing a «mansion tax»If the Government has money to spare, most of us would prefer income tax cuts to higher welfare benefits; and if the Government has to raise more money, there is a clear public preference for limiting welfare payments to big families, rather than imposing a «mansion tax»if the Government has to raise more money, there is a clear public preference for limiting welfare payments to big families, rather than imposing a «mansion tax».

She might raise more money than anyone else, but I would not be afraid of Hillary if I were a Republican campaign strategist.

But if the debt ceiling isn't raised, then the federal government is essentially stuck unable to pay its bills because it can't borrow more money.

«Even if he loses by 15 points or more he's shown he can raise money.

Low - wage workers would have more money in their pockets if the state rolled back fees on cell phones and gasoline rather than raising the minimum wage, he says.

«I would be thrilled if I obtain an important raise» from the government, Petit says, but he also hopes to raise more money from competitive grants in France and the European Union and from industry partnerships.

If these same children were raised in higher income households, the results suggest they would earn more money, contributing rather than depending on tax revenue.

Charities could raise more money from more people if they were to announce that a startup grant had been used to defray overhead expenses.

This is why I don't understand doomsday articles this early in a consoles life span, The Wii u barely has any games worth buying yet, but as soon as it does then the sales will skyrocket, I like the Wii u, Now I just wish I had more money to buy more game's, Man I want Lego City, Think about it if Monster hunter can make the sale's raise this much what will happen when Super smash bros Wii u, Pikmin 3, Mario kart U, Yoshi's yarn, 3d Mario game, Zelda Wind waker HD, Zelda HD, possible Metroid game, possible Gamecube games coming to the VC, The VC being fully released with GBA games, What ever Retro is working on, Game and Wario looks fun I doubt it will be a console seller, And many other unannounced game's are released all the «Is the Wii u doomed?!»

But if your parents need to raise money to pay for your physical education teacher or librarian, then you will have to raise significant amounts of money, and that will mean bigger and more frequent events.