Sentences with phrase «raising prices too»

You get a backlash if you raise prices too much.

Stocks provide better protection to inflation because when prices rise, a company can raise their prices too.

Having said that, I really know the feeling of how scary it might be to raise your price too high and then no one will buy your paintings.

If they raise prices too much agents will revolt.

Not exact matches

Clark soon felt the new company was spread too thin and subsequently made poor decisions for Kodiak Cakes, including raising prices.

Goldman Sachs is not ready to raise its $ 62 target on Brent and $ 57.50 forecast for U.S. crude in 2018, but says there's a growing risk that global inventories will fall too quickly and push up prices.

You of course want maximum value for your business but setting an asking price too high could raise a red flag, scaring away potential buyers.

PRICE RATIONALE Two sticking points here: a land lease that dead - ends too soon and a cash - flow pattern that's positively hair - raising.

Why is it when business controls prices, and raise them too much, workers must pay the price?

On the other side of the debate, Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, argued in a speech on Thursday night that the Fed should not raise rates this year because price inflation remains too low.

I asked her about reports that her government is planning to raise Alberta's $ 15 per tonne carbon price to $ 40 per tonne as a means to getting American approval for the pipeline project — a price that environmental critics say would be still too low.

It's just that demand is too high, so firms decide they can increase profits by raising their prices above other firms» prices rather than continuing to produce enough output to meet demand at existing prices.

Unless you have a big profit cushion in a position and can hold through a 20 % to 30 % price correction without feeling too much pressure, it may be wise to raise the stop prices on any open positions you are holding (then wait for lower risk re-entry points to emerge).

But if the Fed starts worrying about inflation, policymakers may decide to raise rates to keep prices from rising too sharply.

In fact, given that the U.S. labor market likely experienced its cyclical peak at the end of 2015 and the Fed began raising rates too late in my opinion, current Fed Funds futures are pricing in essentially only one hike in 2016, according to data accessible via Bloomberg.

«[Crypto values] went too high, too fast... at the time I urged caution, saying an asset that goes almost vertically up should typically raise alarm bells for investors... Arguable, even before the frenzied peak in December, when the price of one Bitcoin reached an all time high of more than $ 19,000, the market was beginning to become frothy and overheated.»

Companies can raise prices arbitrarily, too, but the competition inherent in our capitalistic system provides limits there.

Central bankers worry about inflation falling too low because it raises the risk of deflation, or generally falling prices, a phenomenon that is difficult to combat through monetary policy.

But all this is not too high a price to pay if cash can be raised for industrial development in the cities!

French group Lactalis has raised the price of a buyout offer on shares in Italy's Parmalat it does not already own to 3 euros per share after some investors complained that the previous offer was too low.

We also waited too long on making a proper Lemar offer and after some big deals including Neymar, they predictably raised their asking price.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

In this case, Nissan may have gilded this lily with too many options, having raised the out - the - door price of a fully - optioned 240 to somewhere near $ 20,000.

When contacted to dealers, they too confirmed that the booking for airbag models have started which raises the price for both models by around Rs. 15,000.

I've read Dean Wesley Smith's pricing suggestions for short fiction before, but while I've been tempted, I've been too unsure of my writing ability timid to try and raise my prices.

OR, if that all seems too pay - to - play, keep it free, but raise the minimum price for a novel to something that will make people consider whether they are going to shell out for the product.

With a lot of features, there's a risk of raising the price point too high.

But I raised it precisely because I had a lot of feedback from fans of my last book, Dead Silver, that its $ 5.99 price point was too low for its length.

When a book becomes a film, for instance, the hardcover, trade paperback and mass market paperback editions of that book may all end up back on the bestseller list at the same time, despite the mass market being the cheapest (and the e-book too — that's one time where the e-book price may be raised again because they know people will pay it.)

The Guardian article analyzes how Apple went too far to come up with «agency pricing» to basically raise the eBook prices according to the publisher's need.

When the economy shows signs of heating up, the Fed starts worrying about inflation, and policymakers may decide to raise rates in order to keep prices from rising too sharply.

But if the Fed starts worrying about inflation, policymakers may decide to raise rates to keep prices from rising too sharply.

Of course, in the real world, small company management compounds these cash - raising issues by doing too little, too late... inevitably issuing shares at the worst possible price — of course, junior resource stock management are the unwitting masters of this tactic.

I see Target raised the Dualshock4 controller price, too (advertising $ 45 now for Friday, they originally advertised $ 40 for Friday — BestBuy and Gamestop still show $ 40, and a friend at work had a deal that gave him BestBuy's Black Friday deals today, so I've already done my shopping through him).

I heard they're considering the possibility of raising game prices $ 5 - $ 10 again «just until production costs lower» for next - gen systems too.

When my price feels «too low», I simply raise it to a point where I know I'll feel good about the sale if I get it, trying to take out the fears of losing sales from being what I perceive to be «too expensive.

The Barnes Tries to Price Out the Riff Raff — In addition to extending its free admission hours to cover entire Saturdays, the popular Barnes Collection, which is approaching the one year anniversary of its controversial move to its new home in Center City Philadelphia, has also decided to raise admission prices from $ 18 to $ 22, perhaps in part to get new visitors to take museum - going more seriously, as CEO Derek Gillman stating that the museum has seen «many more people not familiar... with what is proper behavior» and «more trangressions of people touching things and getting too close.»

To put it simple — everything is too expensive; therefore, many collectors finally began to buy pieces of Italian artists (consequently raising their prices).

In 2009, Southern Company lobbied hard against the climate bill passed by the House of Representatives — which died the following year in the Senate — on the grounds that it would have raised energy prices too much.

Recognizing that American motorists will reject any policies that raise fuel prices, the people pushing new regulations on the energy sector are trying to have their cake and eat it too.

Notice, too, that Monsanto is drastically raising prices while it is making phenomenal profits, while food prices are rising dramatically (related often to its grains), leading to food riots around the world, and while fuel is skyrocketing and Monsanto's corn is now the basis of biofuel, and while our economy is tanking.

Both Uber and Lyft raise their prices during peak travel times, or when too many riders are trying to set a pickup time at once.

It's too early to tell if this will lower abuse on Twitter (nevermind if it'll raise its number of daily active users and selling price) but time will tell.

In contrast, if they set the price too low, the built - in limitation on the amount of ether they want to raise will kick in.

«It's also increased the competition for land that has water and raised those prices, too, which is something people don't think about right away.»

Hearing news about home prices going up, and raising your price immediately as a response to that, is typically not the way to go; the home will likely sell for more as a result of two buyers fighting over your reasonable price, rather than walking away due to a price that's too high.

When you price your house too low, the market will raise the price due to multiple offers over... Read More >>

Don't be surprised if many people don't want to give up their contractors, because finding good, trustworthy contractors is difficult, and investors often don't want them to become too busy or raise prices.