Since a lottery was being conducted, it would be possible to compare outcomes for two
randomly selected groups of students: those who won the lottery and were offered a scholarship compared to those who applied for a scholarship but did not win the lottery.
Not exact matches
Christakis and Fowler report online today in PLoS ONE that
students in the friend
group showed signs
of the flu between 14 and 69 days before the epidemic peaked in the control
group of randomly selected undergraduates.
The effect was to give a
randomly selected group of nondisabled
students extra time, about the equivalent
of time and a half.
The teacher
randomly selects one
student's work from each
group and grades it as representative
of the whole
group, so that the entire
group receives the same grade.
And since the learning - disabled
students were not a
randomly selected group but a
group of students who requested accommodations for their retest, one has no idea whether the findings can be generalized to the disabled population as a whole.
For over four decades, beginning with a science assessment in 1969, the LTT NAEP has tested
randomly -
selected groups of students age 9, 13, and 17 in several school subjects.
This idea led to a somewhat ill - conceived experiment by Vanderbilt researchers in which a
randomly selected group of teachers received bonuses based on the performance
of their
students.
First, 30
students referring to the counseling center were
randomly selected and then they were divided into two
groups of 15 each.
Three classrooms
of 6th grade
students were
randomly selected and assigned to three
groups.
Of those
students who agree to participate, half are
randomly selected for the CBITS
group; the other half receive regular services provided by the school and information about local community resources.