In a separate development, free
range egg producers are threatening to go to the ACCC if the Egg Corporation persists in allowing free range farmers to run as many as 20,000 laying birds per hectare, the equivalent of two birds a square metre.
The definition of free range eggs is also being questioned, with free
range egg producers threatening to ask the ACCC to conduct a separate investigation into the industry.
Not exact matches
The Australian
Egg Corporation Limited - representing 400 commercial egg producers that distribute a range of products to the local market - said banning eggs from one egg production system was misguid
Egg Corporation Limited - representing 400 commercial
egg producers that distribute a range of products to the local market - said banning eggs from one egg production system was misguid
egg producers that distribute a
range of products to the local market - said banning
eggs from one
egg production system was misguid
egg production system was misguided.
Ranging from a «5 -
egg» to a «1 -
egg» rating, the
producer's score is dependent on the quality of hen laying housing conditions, compliance in meeting USDA expectations and organic standards, as well as the organization's transparency in releasing information surrounding their
egg production practices.
Mr Westwood said the corporation - which represents about 400 commercial
egg producers - repeatedly told free -
range farmers that there was community support for the 20,000 hen per hectare limit during industry consultations about the proposed new definition of «free
range» - despite knowing at the time that fewer than one in 10 people deemed it acceptable.
The free -
range egg industry code limits
producers to 1500 hens per hectare but there is no legally enforceable definition of free
range.
The ACCC has produced this guide to help hen
egg producers of all sizes understand their fair trading rights and obligations when promoting or selling free
range eggs.
But she said the lack of any meaningful free
range egg standard meant that «genuine»
producers faced an uphill climb.
«Fifteen hundred hens is in line with the best animal welfare accreditation standards that Australia has, it set Queensland up and gave them an actual advantage over the rest of the states and could have offered an advantage for
producers against the rest of the country, because they could offer genuine free
range eggs to consumers.»
INDUSTRY DEFINITIONS & FINDINGS: HR 3798 Legislation, written and supported by both the United
Egg Producers (UEP) and the Humane Society of the US (HSUS), and introduced in the last Congress, defines «Free Range» as: «(1) «Eggs from free - range hens» to indicate that the egg - laying hens from which the eggs or egg products were derived were, during egg production ----(A) not housed in caging devices; and (B) provided with outdoor access.&raq
Egg Producers (UEP) and the Humane Society of the US (HSUS), and introduced in the last Congress, defines «Free
Range» as: «(1) «Eggs from free - range hens» to indicate that the egg - laying hens from which the eggs or egg products were derived were, during egg production ----(A) not housed in caging devices; and (B) provided with outdoor access.&r
Range» as: «(1) «
Eggs from free -
range hens» to indicate that the egg - laying hens from which the eggs or egg products were derived were, during egg production ----(A) not housed in caging devices; and (B) provided with outdoor access.&r
range hens» to indicate that the
egg - laying hens from which the eggs or egg products were derived were, during egg production ----(A) not housed in caging devices; and (B) provided with outdoor access.&raq
egg - laying hens from which the
eggs or
egg products were derived were, during egg production ----(A) not housed in caging devices; and (B) provided with outdoor access.&raq
egg products were derived were, during
egg production ----(A) not housed in caging devices; and (B) provided with outdoor access.&raq
egg production ----(A) not housed in caging devices; and (B) provided with outdoor access.»