Sentences with phrase «range error bars»

Not exact matches

Supernova 1992bi had error bars that were down into the range of acceleration.

Error bars denote the 5 — 95 % uncertainty range.

There is no BMI data marker and error bar for cancer mortality because the 95 % confidence intervals for the hazard ratios overlap almost the entire upper range of BMI in all 3 cohorts.

[Response: If you screen the models to have surface trends similar to that observed, you do reduce the tropospheric range of responses, but error bars still overlap with the uncertainty in the obs.

So there the error bars are -1 K and +1.5 K. Annan & Hargreaves give a means to narrow this range somewhat and I think they give 2.8 K as most likely.

Many experts on China caution that most sources of data there should come with fat error bars, given past instances in which official estimates of activities ranging from coal extraction to fish catches proved to be way off.

Projections of future climate changes in different emissions - scenarios are accompanied by error - bars representing the range of uncertainty.

«An entirely equivalent argument [to the error bars] would be to say (accurately) that there is a 2K range of pre-industrial absolute temperatures in GCMs, and therefore the global mean temperature is liable to jump 2K at any time — which is clearly nonsense...»

«Hansen's 2 - sigma error bars (green) are very misleading compared to the range exhibited in the Hadley data.»

Trends reflect the mean change in temperature (in K per decade) between 20 ° N and 20 ° S for the period 1979 — 2005, obtained from radiosonde temperature measurements 5 (blue and green colours), climate models 8 (dashed orange, with grey shading indicating 2 - sigma range) and the new reconstructions from radiosonde winds 4 (pink, with error bars indicating 2 - sigma range).

Error bars denote the 5 — 95 % uncertainty range.

If they think the data is incorrect, they should simply be applying the appropriate ERROR bars, and let the truth be seen (i.e., BOTH what the «observation» was and what the range of ERROR was).

If the range of the error bar is 0.8 and the prediction is for 0.2, what good is the predictive quality of the model?

The boxes represent the first and third quartile range (50 % of the data), the line is the median value, the star is the mean, and the error bars cover 9 % to 91 % of the data.

Thirdly anthropogenic global warming [ANT] is still put at greater than 100 %, ie 110 %, after taking off the supposed negative aerosol effect [OA], which is so unknown that the error bars are bigger than the guesstimate.This is where Gavin obtains his 110 % likely range of Anthropogenic warming that he attributes to the IPCC.

I thought the entire error range for NCDC global surface temps was 0.09 C + \ - 0.045 C. (NASA GISS is + \ - 0.05 C.) But the error bars on the graph in this post show + \ - 0.09 C which is 0.18 C overall range.

If you do that, with enough stations, and the change in each is the same within a certain range, it seems to me that that gives you your correction with error bars for that change.

On another topic, it appears that error bars (+ / --RRB- in the summary tables is on average around.5 deg C (in my scan I have seen a range of.20 — .62).

Using only 2003 - 2008 data from Argo floats, we find by four different algorithms that the recent trend ranges from — 0.010 to — 0.161 W / m2 with a typical error bar of ± 0.2 W / m2.

Bucket readings and engine intake readings are basically apples and oranges unless you are willing to put an error bar of 3 or 5 degree F range.

Even in the ARGO era (2003 --RRB-, the error bars and uncertainty ranges for our educated guesses (that's what they are) about deep ocean heat are 10 times greater (and more) than the suggested temperature changes (hundredths of a degree) themselves.

Error bars (2.5 — 97.5 %) and boxes (33 — 67 %) and central lines (median) represent the range of mean distances between a specific ensemble member and all other members plus observations.