It turns out support for increased property taxes is correlated with how respondents
ranked local public schools.
Not exact matches
Public supports Common Core, and when given national
ranking of
local schools, Americans give those
schools lower grades and express greater support for vouchers, charters, and teacher tenure reform
Analysis of the new survey data show that when the
public is armed with information about the
local district's national
ranking, the share assigning an «A» or «B» grade to the
local schools falls by 11 percentage points.
Academia has a set of standards that you move up based on the number of articles that you get published in the highest
ranked publications, which cater to an exclusive audience of other academics that doesn't include the general
public, community educators, and the people on the ground at
local schools.»
If CCSS were to enhance
public knowledge of the performance of
local schools as compared to
schools elsewhere in the state and nation, the impact on the
school reform debate could be substantial, especially (but not exclusively) in those districts that are
ranked below average nationally.
But we find little evidence of a
public backlash against Common Core and test - based accountability, at least on the basis of new information about
local school district
rankings.
Taken as a whole, information about
local school rankings has a less substantial impact on
public thinking about teacher policy than it has on thinking about
school choice policies.
Information about
local district
rankings increases
public support for
school choice programs, including charter
schools, parent trigger mechanisms, and, especially,
school vouchers for all students.
Overall,
public support for
school choice increases when the
public is informed of the
local district's
ranking in the state or nation.
There is another facet to the
public - private discussion that the traditionalists and the teachers unions have never quite got around to addressing, which is that many
rank - and - file teachers eschew their
local public school and go the private route themselves.
Students are eligible for the program if the student's resident district is not a
school district in which the pilot project scholarship program is operating and the student satisfies one of the following conditions: the student attends a
local public school that has received a grade D or F by the state's performance index score, the student is assigned to a community
school but would otherwise be assigned to a qualifying
school, the student attends a
local public school that was
ranked in the lowest 10 percent of
public schools in two of the three most recent
rankings and the
public school was not declared to be excellent or effective in the most recent rating system, or the student is enrolling in grades K — 12 for the first time and would be assigned to a qualifying
school as long as they are at least 5 years old by Jan. 1 of the
school year.
He declared unconstitutional and «irrational» the way Connecticut funds and oversees
local public schools; he found that the state government has the enforceable responsibility under Connecticut's constitution to provide all students an adequate education — not just the wealthy suburban kids who
rank first nationwide in reading scores, but also the many «functionally illiterate» high -
school graduates from the 30 poorest Connecticut
school districts, which
rank below Mississippi and 39 other states in those same scores.
They also argued the
rankings set a low bar for academic quality by comparing charter
schools with
local public districts, many of which are struggling urban
schools, rather than with top - performing
schools elsewhere.
The State Department of Education's level of concern is about chronic and excessive absenteeism is so great, that just last month the State Board of Education announced their intention to «
rank order» all Connecticut
public schools based each
school's level of student absenteeism and that poor absentee rates could lead to state takeover of
local schools.