Especially when one considers that it is just a single instance of many possible amplifying carbon feedbacks set off by a very
rapid human warming.
Not exact matches
This time the
warming is more
rapid, though, and comes with the added challenge of
human - driven habitat destruction, illegal hunting and pollution.
Polar bears are likely to have survived periods of
warming before, but Axel Janke at the Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre in Frankfurt, Germany, points out that this time the
warming is more
rapid and is happening in tandem with
human - driven habitat destruction, illegal hunting and pollution.
The same is not true for the Antarctic Peninsula, the part of the continent closer to South America, where
rapid ice loss has been even more dramatic and where the changes are almost certainly a result of
human - caused
warming, Steig said.
«Instead, more than 1000 years of
human occupation passed before a
rapid warming event occurred, and then the megafauna were extinct within a hundred years.»
«As Earth continues to
warm, it may be approaching a critical climate threshold beyond which
rapid and potentially permanent — at least on a
human time - scale — changes not anticipated by climate models tuned to modern conditions may occur,» the report says.
«Today the Earth is still adjusting to the recent
rapid rise of CO2 caused by
human activities, whereas the longer - term Pliocene records document the full response of CO2 - related
warming,» says Southampton's Dr Gavin Foster, co-author of the study.
«Recent
warming coincides with
rapid growth of
human - made greenhouse gases.
Given the very
rapid warming of the Arctic, I'd like to see a multinational «war room» for models, observation, and a database of solutions, or at least ways for
humans and other creatures to adapt.
However, Petrenko found that the gradual, natural global
warming and
rapid regional
warming that characterized the deglaciation 12,000 years ago — events that were in some aspects comparable to the current
human - driven global
warming — did not trigger detectable releases of methane from these reservoirs.
Because
human - made
warming is more
rapid than natural long - term
warmings in the past, there is concern that methane hydrate or peat feedbacks could be more
rapid than the feedbacks that exist in the paleoclimate record.
Before we go into some fascinating details about the instability of life here on Earth, one quick question: does the study of the past tell us important things about the
rapid warming humans are causing today?
Terrell Johnson, reporting on a recent NASA publication concluding that deep ocean temperatures have not increased since 2005 (http://www.weather.com/science/environment/news/deep-ocean-hasnt-warmed-nasa-20141007): «While the report's authors say the findings do not question the overall science of climate change, it is the latest in a series of findings that show global
warming to have slowed considerably during the 21st century, despite continued
rapid growth in
human - produced greenhouse gas emissions during the same time.»
No matter what short term metrics are applied, the Arctic is undergoing long term
rapid melting, dominantly as a result of
human - induced global
warming and climate change.
In fact previous climate
warming after the last ice age did have significant negative impacts on early
human settlements (evidence of periods of significant and
rapid regional sea level rise).
Political realities indicate only unusually
rapid development of this (and parallel) revolutionary science and technology can improve the odds for
human survival on this dangerously
warming planet.
«Recent
warming coincides with
rapid growth of
human - made greenhouse gases.
The fact that Christy and Pielke Sr. are scientists allows their skeptical positions on
rapid GHG driven global
warming to be even harder to deal with when I attempt to inform people that
rapid GHG driven global
warming is happening and that
humans need to act quickly to reduce GHG emissions in order to delay and to reduce the catastrophe that lies ahead due to global
warming.
That bold statement may seem like hyperbole, but there is now a very clear pattern in the scientific evidence documenting that the earth is
warming, that
warming is due largely to
human activity, that
warming is causing important changes in climate, and that
rapid and potentially catastrophic changes in the near future are very possible.
a) atmospheric CO2 from
human activity is a major bause of observed
warming in the 1980's and 1990's, c) that
warming is overstated due to a number of factors including solar effects and measurement skew d) the data going back 150 years is of little reliability because it is clustered so heavily in northeast america and western europe rather than being global e) the global climate has been significantly shifting over the last thousand years, over the last ten thousand years, and over the last hundred thousand years; atmospheric CO2 levels did not drive those changes, and some of them were
rapid.
But there was also a
rapid rising temperature period between 1695 and 1736 when there would have been no measurable increases in CO2 and therefore
human induced
warming.
Zachriel: A bit
warmer is okay, but
rapid warming of several degrees would be highly disruptive to
humans and ecosystems.
The findings reinforce suggestions that strong positive ice — temperature feedbacks have emerged in the Arctic15, increasing the chances of further
rapid warming and sea ice loss, and will probably affect polar ecosystems, ice - sheet mass balance and
human activities in the Arctic...» *** This is the heart of polar amplification and has very little to do with your stated defintion of amplifying the effects of
warming going on at lower latitudes.
A bit
warmer is okay, but
rapid warming of several degrees would be highly disruptive to
humans and ecosystems.
Sea level rise, ocean acidification and the
rapid melting of massive ice sheets are among the significantly increased effects of
human - induced global
warming assessed in the survey, which also examines the emissions of heat - trapping gases that are causing the climate change.
To say this another way, even if worst case
warming scenarios with regards to feedbacks do emerge, all it does, from the
human standpoint, is make
rapid responses to climate change all the more urgent and necessary.
Several new studies support this
human - caused boost of a natural pattern, though controversy still exists regarding the mechanisms linking
rapid Arctic
warming with weather patterns farther south in the mid-latitudes.
What is concerning is the possibility that
rapid global
warming could occur faster than many people believe is possible, if global warming due to atmospheric carbon dioxide causes the Earth's atmosphere to warm enough to release enormous deposits of frozen methane (CH4) that are stored in the permafrost above the Arctic Circle and in frozen methane ice, known as methane hydrate, underneath the floors of the oceans throughout the world (see: How Methane Gas Releases Due To Global Warming Could Cause Human Extin
warming could occur faster than many people believe is possible, if global
warming due to atmospheric carbon dioxide causes the Earth's atmosphere to warm enough to release enormous deposits of frozen methane (CH4) that are stored in the permafrost above the Arctic Circle and in frozen methane ice, known as methane hydrate, underneath the floors of the oceans throughout the world (see: How Methane Gas Releases Due To Global Warming Could Cause Human Extin
warming due to atmospheric carbon dioxide causes the Earth's atmosphere to
warm enough to release enormous deposits of frozen methane (CH4) that are stored in the permafrost above the Arctic Circle and in frozen methane ice, known as methane hydrate, underneath the floors of the oceans throughout the world (see: How Methane Gas Releases Due To Global
Warming Could Cause Human Extin
Warming Could Cause
Human Extinction).
-- The same goes for the earlier multi-decadal period of slight cooling (~ 1940 - 1970) and especially for the early 20thC period of
rapid warming (1910 - 1940), which occurred prior to significant
human GHG emissions.
A steady decline — and eventual cessation — of sunspot activity, which normally triggers with a cooling period on Earth, in this case coincides with the most
rapid period of
warming in
human history with no sign of an end to the upward trend.
The faux pause has nonetheless been used by political partisans like Senator Cruz to cast doubt on the overwhelming scientific consensus that
humans are causing
rapid global
warming, simply because they find the political implications of that scientific reality inconvenient â $» to their ideological views and the views of the special interests who fund their campaigns.
Human activity is already putting stress on biosystems — add
rapid warming on top of that and the effects are likely to be severe.
In the end, the question must be asked — is Siberia sitting atop a methane volcano that is being prodded to
rapid wakening by high - velocity
human warming?
People are concerned that the
rapid global
warming due to
human activities is one of the main reasons why the world's ice shelves are thinning and declining faster than expected.
The scientists note that the combination of
rapid global
warming and
human ecological impacts «will present terrestrial ecosystems with an environment that is unprecedented in recent evolutionary history.»
The claim that
human CO2 causes
rapid, accelerating global
warming is empirically a very bogus statement.
Simply put, accelerating,
rapid warming is not happening presently (but rest assured, it will happen in the future, just like it has in the past - and that's what natural climate change does, no
human CO2 required).
This can no longer be denied by the scientific community and the politicians fanatically pushing the anti-science claim that dangerous and
rapid global
warming is taking place, due to
human CO2 emissions.
Fueled by seemingly endless United Nations Eco-Summits, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the
rapid rise of dark green nature spirituality in the west, politicians and scientists
warmed to the idea that
humans are causing unprecedented heating of the planet.
It is a distribution of broad,
rapid warming and isolated localized cooling consistent with what global climate models have been predicting for
human - forced climate change for many decades now.
Complaints focus on the environmental impacts of mountaintop removal mining, the projected high costs of carbon capture and storage, the
human health dangers of large,
rapid releases of carbon dioxide, the global
warming risk posed by small levels leakage over long periods, increases in coal mining needed to run scrubbers as well as carbon capture and storage systems.
A (2) Modern
warming, glacier and sea ice recession, sea level rise, drought and hurricane intensities... are all occurring at unprecedentedly high and
rapid rates, and the effects are globally synchronous (not just regional)... and thus dangerous consequences to the global biosphere and
human civilizations loom in the near future as a consequence of anthropogenic influences.
And with
human warming now proceeding at a pace about 20 times faster than the end of the last ice age, the risk for
rapid melt has been greatly enhanced.
Many lines of independent evidence demonstrate that the
rapid warming of the past half - century is due primarily to
human activities.
Global
warming is the recent
rapid warming of the earth, caused by the
human activities of deforestation and the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) in industry, transport and the generation of electricity.
• Also, the unusually
rapid rate of global
warming we are causing will make it very difficult for ecosystems — not to mention
humans — to adapt.
A)
Human - induced
warming is already
rapid and is expected to further accelerate.
The hockeystick graph [bottom graph below] claims that the 20th century showed unusually
rapid warming — and thus suggests a strong
human influence.
The idea that
humans contributed to some portion of that
warming was just common sense, given the
rapid pace of industrialization.
Whether or not you agree with the 97 percent expert consensus on
human - caused global
warming, there is an undeniable risk that the consensus is correct and that we're causing dangerously
rapid climate change.