Not exact matches
So isn't
rapidly extracting and burning all that concentrated form of carbon and turning it
into dispersed carbon dioxide increasing the planet's entropy very quickly, thus taking us very quickly closer to thermodynamic
equilibrium and ultimately the planet's death?
The standard assumption has been that, while heat is transferred
rapidly into a relatively thin, well - mixed surface layer of the ocean (averaging about 70 m in depth), the transfer
into the deeper waters is so slow that the atmospheric temperature reaches effective
equilibrium with the mixed layer in a decade or so.
Also, the stability of the ice shelves is doubtful and without them the ice sheet would probably flow much more
rapidly into the sea, finding a new
equilibrium after losing a great deal of mass.
Of course there are interrelations — I understand that a lot of energy (& heat) goes
into melting ice, and the area (water, air) remains cool up until all / most the ice is melted, then the water and air are «free» to rise
rapidly in temp to their new
equilibrium (according to whatever the particular GW forces are).
Arctic sea ice is declining
rapidly, and some researchers predict that fresh meltwater will inhibit nutrient transport and limit biological activity, allowing the surface ocean to come
into equilibrium with atmospheric CO2 and promoting acidification.