Sentences with phrase «rate than hospital»

Ina may also has a much higher death rate than hospital birth.

The county allowed the hospital to have the Erie County Fiscal Stability Authority — better known as the control board — borrow money on the hospital's behalf because the control board has a far better bond rating than the hospital and can borrow money much more cheaply.

Not exact matches

Black Medicare patients are being readmitted to hospitals at a much higher rate than white patients, according to a recent study.

In our tests, the Gene Knockout Kit gave us greater than 80 percent knock - out rates for seven targets,» shares Shondra Miller, Ph.D., Director, Center for Advanced Genome Engineering at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, on Synthego's web site.

Controlling for the share of a hospital's admissions of low - income patients (with Medicaid insurance) or its share of surgical admissions all added more information than Yelp ratings alone.

Yelp has even partnered with ProPublica to publish average wait times, readmission rates, and quality of communication scores for more than 25,000 hospitals, nursing homes, and dialysis clinics.

All such reputable helpers I know — especially the psychiatrists — do give service to people at lower rates, in many instances working part - time in a clinic or hospital for less than they would receive in private practice.

If the hospital you're delivering at has a rate of 50 % or higher, there's a good chance they push them more than necessary.

A Consumer Reports analysis of 1,300 hospitals found that more than half of hospitals have C - section rates that are higher than the national target.

«We have seen the rates of NEC decline from 8 - 10 percent to less than one percent since 2009, when we began requiring pasteurized donor breast milk when mothers» own milk is not available for our infants,» says Nancy Hurst, PhD, RN, IBCLC, and director of Women's Support Services at Texas Children's Hospital.

And this paper in the BMJ suggest low risk moms with midwives at home have a higher mortality rate than all the high risk moms in hospitals.

No matter that it comports with the data from Oregon that shows that PLANNED homebirth with a LICENSED homebirth midwife has a death rate 9X higher than comparable risk hospital birth or that MANA has found that its own members have such hideous death rates that they have been desperately hiding them for years.

With a mortality rate of almost 5x higher than hospital birth, this is not that far off the 6 - 8 times higher we saw for the Oregon data collection, even though the Oregon group almost surely had significantly fewer criteria for risking mothers out (no criteria in some places, I'm sure) as well as lower qualifications for the midwives as CPMs and DEMs.

And North Carolina is vying to be the homebirth death capital of the US: they had 5 publicly reported homebirth deaths last year for a rate 12X higher than low risk hospital birth.

That's why it is absolutely critical for readers of Charlotte's story to understand that Charlotte didn't have to die, that homebirth increases the risk of perinatal death, and that licensed Oregon homebirth midwives have a death rate 800 % higher than term hospital birth.

This is the 4th confirmed homebirth death in NC this year for a rate that is a whopping TEN times higher than the rate of death for comparable risk hospital birth.

A more recent study showed that low risk birth (home or hospital) with a Dutch midwife has a HIGHER perinatal mortality rate than high risk delivery with a Dutch obstetrician.

The following quote from the article above puzzles me to no end: «The latest CDC figures (publicly available on the CDC Wonder website) show that planned homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a mortality rate 600 % HIGHER than low risk hospital birth.»

In Oregon, babies die at the hands of CPMs at a much higher rate than they do in hospital, comparing low - risk women.

The latest CDC figures (publicly available on the CDC Wonder website) show that planned homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a mortality rate 600 % HIGHER than low risk hospital birth.

(Physician rates are higher than midwife rates because hospital midwives transfer high - risk cases to the physician service.)

I would love to see a study that compares the rates of trauma sustained between PLANNED homebirth and PLANNED hospital birth — I'd be willing to bet that planned homebirth is actually more likely to be traumatic than planned hospital birth.

In yet another example of a strikingly robust finding, planned homebirth in NZ had more than triple the neonatal death rate of planned hospital birth.

That's TEN TIMES HIGHER than the national neonatal mortality rate for low risk hospital birth with a CNM.

Low risk women in primary care at the onset of labour with planned home birth had lower rates of severe acute maternal morbidity, postpartum haemorrhage, and manual removal of placenta than those with planned hospital birth.

As the recently released statistics from Oregon show, planned homebirth with a licensed homebirth midwife has a mortality rate 800 % HIGHER than term hospital birth.

Breastfeeding rates have been shown to be higher among babies born in Baby - Friendly hospitals than among babies born in other hospitals.

There is a much higher rate of infections to new moms and babies in hospitals than born at home.

Despite the fact that the United States spends more money on health care than any other country — and more on maternity care than any other type of hospital care — maternal mortality rates are actually increasing for U.S. women rather than decreasing.

The perinatal (around the time of birth) death rate of babies born in nonhospital settings is much higher than for babies born in a hospital, even though their mothers are supposedly lower - risk.

In some ways the situation in Israel is better than in the US in that mothers are expected to nurse their babies in the hospital, and there is a very high initiation rate.

Flint and colleagues suggested that when midwives get to know the women for whom they provide care, interventions are minimised.22 The Albany midwifery practice, with an unselected population, has a rate for normal vaginal births of 77 %, with 35 % of women having a home birth.23 A review of care for women at low risk of complications has shown that continuity of midwifery care is generally associated with lower intervention rates than standard maternity care.24 Variation in normal birth rates between services (62 % -80 %), however, seems to be greater than outcome differences between «high continuity» and «traditional care» groups at the same unit.25 26 27 Use of epidural analgesia, for example, varies widely between Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, and the North Staffordshire NHS Trust.

In Oregon, there have been at least 19 newborn deaths reported to the state over the past decade for a death rate more than 4 times higher than low risk hospital birth.

Conclusions: Low risk women in primary care at the onset of labour with planned home birth had lower rates of severe acute maternal morbidity, postpartum haemorrhage, and manual removal of placenta than those with planned hospital birth.

What floors me is how people continue to ignore the glaringly obvious fact, that homebirth, even under the best circumstances, continues to kill mothers and babies at a rate that is far higher than births that occur in hospital settings.

We have the data that shows homebirth mortality rates with CPMs is 5.4 / 1000 which is actually 7 - 9 xs greater than in hospital births with similar co-factors.

Planned homebirth with a licensed homebirth midwife in Oregon has a death rate 9X higher than term births in the hospital.

Obviously, that is 9 times higher than the hospital death rate for low risk women.

Or are she and the authors of the study so ignorant of childbirth safety statistics that they don't realize that the homebirth death rate 400 % higher than comparable risk hospital birth?

That's a maternal death rate at home birth more than 20 TIMES HIGHER than the maternal death rate in the hospital.

Which raises the question: Is Dahlen deliberately trying to trick readers, since a neonatal mortality rate of 2.2 / 1000 is 5X higher than comparable risk hospital birth?

(Addendum: One death is is a stillbirth, so there were 12 neonatal deaths for a rate 3X higher than comparable risk hospital birth.)

The study shows a VERY HIGH neonatal mortality rate, 400 % higher than comparable risk hospital birth.

In Colorado, licensed homebirth midwives have a perinatal death rate more than double that of all hospital birth in the state (including premature babies).

Unless the mother is too wooy or a midwife herself, it does seem that a free birthing mother is more likely to go to a doctor or hospital if there are complications which could explain why unassisted births in either the Colorado or Oregon study showed a lower mortality rate for unassisted than midwife attended.

Instead there have been 13 deaths that I have heard about and confirmed for a death rate that is more than 3X higher than comparable risk hospital birth.

The author seems to be implying that the hospital is doing some sort of bad thing to the multips that is causing them to bleed and retain at higher rates than they would have if they had stayed home.

And actually, I just checked the rate at Pullman is higher than the rate at the two major hospitals in Spokane!

To put this into context, over time, Dr Amy has presented several different lines of hard evidence that the death rate for babies is higher in home birth than it is at hospitals, in America.

Second, the authors ACTUALLY showed that homebirth with a CPM in 2000 had a mortality rate 3X higher than comparable risk hospital birth in 2000.