For example, 93 percent of students
rated health items as «sometimes» or «usually» the reason for missing school with short - term illness, chronic illness, and medical appointments being common examples.
Not exact matches
The free app has a database of science - based
health, social and environmental
ratings for over 170,000
items.
91 % of those with high science knowledge (based on a nine -
item index across a range of science topics)
rate the preventive
health benefits of the MMR vaccine as high.
There are also tons of clothing
items with armor
ratings and
health boosts that can be collected and used to adorn Daryl.
by Janice Frasche Dog Food: A Short Guide to Choosing Better Products by Sabine Contreras
Health Issues in the Anatolian Shepherd by Holly Ballester Anatolian Shepherd Dog Puppy Growth
Rates: from birth to adult by Janice Frasche An Introduction to Radiographic Diagnosis for Hip Dysplasia by Kath Coniglio BOGUS: The Shepherd Dog Wrestling by Guvener Isik IT BOGUSU / DOG WRESTLING in ANATOLIA by Guvener Isik Show News Life with an Anatolian PUPPY OFA Report, October 2006 to February 2007 UKC's 2006 Top Anatolian Membership Application Letters Anatolian Shepherd Dog
Items for sale Calendar Information Bea Hoffman's Anatolian Cartoons
There is some persistence in the game in the form of stamina and
health upgrades, however, the drop
rate for those
items is rare.
The fixed camera angles can make locating
items and navigating areas extremely difficult, whilst even the inventory management screen that comes complete with a
health status bar, a heart
rate animation and limited
item slots, ensures that very little in Outbreak: The New Nightmare feels original or new.
Etrian Odyssey is informative about the encounter
rate because the number of encounters the player can endure is very strictly determined due to the scarcity of
health, mana, and
items.
There are also tons of clothing
items with armor
ratings and
health boosts that can be collected and used to adorn Daryl.
You'll also be able to upgrade player stats such as total
health, armor, ammo capacity, movement speed and
item drop
rate from enemies.
United States Air Force (Al Dhafra Air Base, United Arab Emirates) 2008 — 2009 Operations Manager / Resource Advisor • Serve as Programs Flight Chief of the 380th Equipment Maintenance Group responsible for $ 3M budget • Plan, direct, and oversee three operation cells dealing with emergency management • Categorize, prioritize, and communicate all incidents including base attacks, and disasters to the Emergency Operations Cell • Dispatch quick reaction forces and Emergency Response teams to breaches in security and to treat wounded personnel • Negotiate and execute $ 3,000,000 paint contract with three one year renewal options • Perform contract surveillance on paint / mezzanine contract for back shop operations • Establish Indefinite Quantity purchase of aircraft synthetic oil and sole sourced supplies to ensure fleet
health • Target high use supply
items, forecast consumption
rates, and prevent loss of production do to non-availability
This five -
item subscale includes a single -
item rating of overall
health ranging from 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor) and four
items assessing youths»
ratings of their current
health status ranging from 1 (definitely false) to 5 (definitely true); e.g., «I am as healthy as anybody I know»; «I seem to get sick a little easier than other people.»
Participants provided sociodemographic data (age, sex, marital status), work grade (consultant, higher / basic specialist trainee), specialty and work hours and completed well - being questionnaires (the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, WHO Well - being Index, General
Health Questionnaire) and single - item scales on self - rated health and self - s
Health Questionnaire) and single -
item scales on self -
rated health and self - s
health and self - stigma.
Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b)
items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative
rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between
items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors
Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom
items on mental
health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental
health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related
rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains
items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).
[The moderated regression models were retested using two
health - related variables as additional covariates on Step 1, scores on a standard single
item measuring self -
rated health and a count of 17
health conditions for which the respondent had received physician diagnoses (e.g., arthritis, ulcers, emphysema).
The Self -
Rated Health Measurement Scale (SRHMS) is a 48 - item scale developed and revised by Xu et al30, 31 to assess self - rated health in hospitalised as well as general populat
Rated Health Measurement Scale (SRHMS) is a 48 - item scale developed and revised by Xu et al30, 31 to assess self - rated health in hospitalised as well as general popula
Health Measurement Scale (SRHMS) is a 48 -
item scale developed and revised by Xu et al30, 31 to assess self -
rated health in hospitalised as well as general populat
rated health in hospitalised as well as general popula
health in hospitalised as well as general populations.
The Foundation for Accountability screener identified children with special
health care needs.24 The Child Behavior Checklist for children 1.5 to 5 years of age measured parents» perceptions of their child's behavioral problems with regard to emotional reactivity, being anxious or depressed, sleep, attention, and aggression.25 Parents
rated their child regarding how true (often, sometimes, or never) each
item was at the time of the interview.
Each
item is
rated on a 10 - point scale from 1 = «extremely poor
health» to 10 = «extremely good
health».
An
item was selected if (1) the majority of a panel of 12 infant mental
health experts
rated it as clinically important to include in a screener and / or (2) the
item had the highest loading on an ITSEA scale.
Inclusion criteria were 24 -
item Hamilton Depression
Rating Scale score of 15 or higher, clinical judgment of depression, and physical
health sufficient to attend outpatient sessions.
Suicidality was assessed with 3
items (hopelessness, thoughts of death, and thoughts of suicide) from the SCL - 20.27 Physical symptom severity was assessed with the PHQ - 15, a 15 -
item scale scored from 0 to 30.28
Health - related quality of life was assessed on the Short Form - 12 (SF - 12) subscales measuring physical health and mental health — related functioning.29 Subscales are normed for the general population so that mean and standard deviation are approximately 50 and 10, respectively.30 Pain intensity and interference were assessed with the Adapted Numeric Rating Scale for Pain31; each item is rated on a 0 - to - 10 Likert
Health - related quality of life was assessed on the Short Form - 12 (SF - 12) subscales measuring physical
health and mental health — related functioning.29 Subscales are normed for the general population so that mean and standard deviation are approximately 50 and 10, respectively.30 Pain intensity and interference were assessed with the Adapted Numeric Rating Scale for Pain31; each item is rated on a 0 - to - 10 Likert
health and mental
health — related functioning.29 Subscales are normed for the general population so that mean and standard deviation are approximately 50 and 10, respectively.30 Pain intensity and interference were assessed with the Adapted Numeric Rating Scale for Pain31; each item is rated on a 0 - to - 10 Likert
health — related functioning.29 Subscales are normed for the general population so that mean and standard deviation are approximately 50 and 10, respectively.30 Pain intensity and interference were assessed with the Adapted Numeric
Rating Scale for Pain31; each
item is
rated on a 0 - to - 10 Likert scale.
The Social
Health Profile [SHP] Social Competence Scale is a 9 -
item rating scale assessing social competence (CPPRG 1997).
Individuals» subjective
health was measured as a response to the
item «How would you
rate your current state of
health?»