Sentences with phrase «rates mean climate»

Such varied migration rates mean climate change is ripping apart the delicate connections between mountainside species, the team concludes.

Not exact matches

It means giving up on B.C. workers, turning back our climate change commitments, and letting industry call the shots when it comes to setting their tax rate, cutting it in half.
As long as there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than before, it will reduce the percentage of thermal radiation which is able to leave the atmosphere, which means that the climate system must heat up if the rate at which energy leaves the climate system is to equal the rate an which energy enters the climate system.
African policy makers do care about the region's rapid rate of population growth — but climate change is by no means the top reason why.
If independent sets of data — perhaps trees with different mean growth rates or from different sites — show similar variations, then we can have greater confidence that those variations are linked to real variations in climate.
Climate change is quite possibly the most important thing humans have ever done — I mean, we're altering our planet's atmosphere perhaps at a faster rate than at any point in Earth's entire history.
Disrupting the climate systems by means of greenhouse gases, and furthermore allowing other species to go extinct at a rate which is totally amazing.
Slowing the rate of global warming means reducing fossil fuel use and halting tropical deforestation; that will give people more time to adapt to our destabilized climate, «using whatever means available.»
This is the problem with what are often called «curve - fitting» standardisation methods — they remove differences in mean growth rate between tree cores even if the difference arises from climate changes that we are trying to reconstruct.
There are uncertainties in the rate at which it might warm, and the natural variation in the climate system means it will not be a smooth warming.
Transient climate sensitivity: The global mean surface - air temperature achieved when atmospheric CO2 concentrations achieve a doubling over pre-industrial CO2 levels increasing at the assumed rate of one percent per year, compounded.
The issue with the Mauritsen and Stevens piece is that it tries to go well beyond a «what if» modeling experiment, and attempts to make contact with a lot of other issues related to historical climate change (the hiatus, changes in the hydrologic cycle, observed tropical lapse rate «hotspot» stuff, changes in the atmsopheric circulation, etc) by means of what the «iris» should look like in other climate signals.
«Even if an area remains wet doesn't mean that it will be protected from the other aspects of climate change: rising and far more erratic air temperatures, higher rates of evaporation (evapotranspiration), and the rising concentration of CO2,» he said in an e-mail message.
(2) Irrigating 1 hectare [just under 2.5 acres] in dry climates requires quite a bit of water, which means reasonably high flow rates, which... implies depth limits.
To me, it would mean that the spin rate of the earth is actually increasing and temporarily reversing its long term trend of slowing, while we are in the polar ice build - up phase of this climate cycle.
Last year, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated the 1901 - 90 rate at 1.5 mm a year, meaning less of a leap to the recent rate around 3 mm.
Some well - meaning people, like the New York Times» first - rate climate reporter Andy Revkin and the great conservation biologist, E. O. Wilson, have gotten taken in by Newt's new clothes rhetoric.
DK12 used ocean heat content (OHC) data for the upper 700 meters of oceans to draw three main conclusions: 1) that the rate of OHC increase has slowed in recent years (the very short timeframe of 2002 to 2008), 2) that this is evidence for periods of «climate shifts», and 3) that the recent OHC data indicate that the net climate feedback is negative, which would mean that climate sensitivity (the total amount of global warming in response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels, including feedbacks) is low.
Local climate in the North Cascades influences mean snowpack depth and ablation rate, but does not cause significantly different responses to annual climate conditions within specific elevation bands.
Understanding how the global - mean precipitation rate will change in response to a climate forcing is a useful thing to know.
J. T. Fasullo, R. S. Nerem & B. Hamlington Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 31245 (2016) doi: 10.1038 / srep31245 Download Citation Climate and Earth system modellingProjection and prediction Received: 13 April 2016 Accepted: 15 July 2016 Published online: 10 August 2016 Erratum: 10 November 2016 Updated online 10 November 2016 Abstract Global mean sea level rise estimated from satellite altimetry provides a strong constraint on climate variability and change and is expected to accelerate as the rates of both ocean warming and cryospheric mass loss increase oveClimate and Earth system modellingProjection and prediction Received: 13 April 2016 Accepted: 15 July 2016 Published online: 10 August 2016 Erratum: 10 November 2016 Updated online 10 November 2016 Abstract Global mean sea level rise estimated from satellite altimetry provides a strong constraint on climate variability and change and is expected to accelerate as the rates of both ocean warming and cryospheric mass loss increase oveclimate variability and change and is expected to accelerate as the rates of both ocean warming and cryospheric mass loss increase over time.
Eating as if the planet matters means eating more healthful foods, wasting less, helping reverse climate change, and reducing the rates of overfishing and overexploitation of soils.
Abstract: «Global mean sea level rise estimated from satellite altimetry provides a strong constraint on climate variability and change and is expected to accelerate as the rates of both ocean warming and cryospheric mass loss increase over time.
Unfortunately, CO2 also moves from the oceans and biosphere (and sequestered fossil fuels, due to our actions) into the atmosphere, which means you are talking about measuring a single interchange rate between various climate compartments, not total concentration changes in any one compartment.
The five - year mean global temperature has been flat for the last decade, which we interpret as a combination of natural variability and a slow down in the growth rate of net climate forcing.
Eating as if the planet matters means eating more healthful foods, wasting less food, helping reverse climate change, and reducing the rates of overfishing and
Climate Action Tracker (CAT) rates Brazil's Paris pledge as «insufficient», meaning it is not consistent with the Paris Agreement's goal to limit warming to below 2C, let alone its intention to limit it to 1.5 C.
Spread over a decade, to reach annual sequestration rates of 860 million tons of carbon by 2020, this would mean investing $ 17 billion a year to give climate stabilization a large and potentially decisive boost.
Which, considering we know 2005 was part of a rise we can not meaningfully distinguish from the trend up to 1997, means we can not accept a claim of a flat or zero climate change to the current date, and we can estimate the odds that the rate of rise in GMT has slowed to be less than 1 / 6th.
This means that only two emission targets — the peak rate and cumulative carbon emissions — are needed to constrain two key indicators of CO2 - induced climate change (peak warming and peak warming rate), as evidenced by the maximum - likelihood estimation method used above.
Surface temperatures across the Arctic are increasing at nearly twice the rate of the global mean in response to natural and forced climate change [1], known as «Arctic Amplification».
«The global mean climate responses to different forcings may differ because of the character of the forcings themselves (such as their geographical or vertical distribution) and because different forcings induce different patterns of surface warming or cooling, thereby affecting the net top - of - atmosphere radiation imbalance, and thus the ocean heat uptake rate
The rapid rate of climate change now means that many groups, ranging from communities to parliaments, now have to factor climate change into their deliberations and decision making more than ever before.
The authors observe that wide variations in rates of tectonic uplift and subsidence in different locations around the world at particular times mean no effective coastal management plan can rest upon speculative computer projections regarding an idealised future global sea level, such as those provided by the United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
All of these characteristics (except for the ocean temperature) have been used in SAR and TAR IPCC (Houghton et al. 1996; 2001) reports for model - data inter-comparison: we considered as tolerable the following intervals for the annual means of the following climate characteristics which encompass corresponding empirical estimates: global SAT 13.1 — 14.1 °C (Jones et al. 1999); area of sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere 6 — 14 mil km2 and in the Southern Hemisphere 6 — 18 mil km2 (Cavalieri et al. 2003); total precipitation rate 2.45 — 3.05 mm / day (Legates 1995); maximum Atlantic northward heat transport 0.5 — 1.5 PW (Ganachaud and Wunsch 2003); maximum of North Atlantic meridional overturning stream function 15 — 25 Sv (Talley et al. 2003), volume averaged ocean temperature 3 — 5 °C (Levitus 1982).
The mean air temperature (1906 - 2005) measured at the climate station Vent (1906 m a.s.l) was -1.6 °C and the mean annual lapse rate is 0.57 °C / 100 m. For additional information on the status of the glacier and on data relating to annual mass balance and other measurements, visit the WGMS Fluctuations of Glaciers Browser.
JimD, «This slower rate of warming — relative to climate model projections — means there is less urgency to phase out greenhouse gas emissions now»
The only meaning in a genuine change in the rate of warming is that the longer term trend provides a slight change in evidence for equilibrium climate sensitivity — perhaps there was more «internal variability» associated with some of the late C20 temperature rise...
1) The slower rate of increase (0.4 % / year) means that the climate response should be a little higher than TCR as defined by IPCC.
I mean if after an Ice Age you can have large and thick glaciers receding at that rate of natural causes why is it so surprising that smaller glaciers in a warmer climate are receding.
Incomplete understanding of three key properties of the climate system — equilibrium climate sensitivity, rate of ocean heat uptake and historical aerosol forcing — and their underlying physical processes lead to uncertainties in our assessment of the global - mean temperature evolution in the twenty - first century 1,2 6.
Dr. James Hansen — NASA GISS — 15 January 2013 «The 5 - year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade, which we interpret as a combination of natural variability and a slowdown in the growth rate of the net climate forcing.»
«Convex» means that the rate at which damages are increasing with increasing climate sensitivity is itself increasing.
Just because the trees in cold climates are relatively widely spaced does not mean they do not differ in their rate of growth during their juvenile phase.
Also, if you look at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.018, it estimates the benefit of the reductions (the avoided climate damage) at 3 % pure discount rate is $ 7.1 bn — this means that for each euro spent, we have avoided $ 0.03 in damages.
Rather, it rapidly accelerates the problem, since global emissions are increasing at a substantial rate such that generation D would be kept below some crucial climate threshold, but delay would mean that they would pass that threshold.
«A strong warming and severe drought predicted on the basis of the ensemble mean of the CMIP climate models simulations is supported by our regression analysis only in a very unlikely case of the continually increasing AMO at a rate similar to its 1970 — 2010 increase» 7
«All these heat - trapping greenhouse gases in our atmosphere mean... our planet has been building up heat at the rate of about four Hiroshima bombs every second — consider that going continuously for several decades», John Cook, Climate Communication Fellow from the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland said.
The Climate Savers programme rates corporate climate performance by means of two dimensions, or two leadership pClimate Savers programme rates corporate climate performance by means of two dimensions, or two leadership pclimate performance by means of two dimensions, or two leadership pillars:
This also mean that those nice climate models should be able to reproduce the same warming rate as observed over 1910 — 1940 period, i.e. +0.15 °C / decade.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z