Of course, there are some of us who are convinced that it is not our believing in God that «saves» us [that would make a «work» out of our belief], but
rather God believing in us.
Not exact matches
I had
in my heart and tongue the Name of Allah when ever I had fears, troubles or depression of any kind but from Jan 05 1995 when had lost my father and second brother
in a car accident, it was the time I really felt am alone at age of 33 to face all the challenges my father has left upon me to run and manage among other partners therefore had been investigating the Quran as to understanding every word of it
rather than to memorize it, have been did a lot of reciting verses of prayers begging
God to look upon me and give me strength... am sure through such difficult times if I had no faith
in God I would have perished and lost every thing long ago... Another thing my heart always gave me signs and my mind gave me logic of what to
believe although have read many books abroad
in my youth of many beliefs out of curiosity but could not belief
in other than that
God is one and Muhammed is his last prophet
in all belief of the Quran he brought upon me / us
in all that it says... Should mention at times had experienced dreams seeing signs and warnings long
in advance of things going to happen A year or more before losing my father
in a car accident I had seen him
in my dream good bye wearing white cloth and going to board a tourist ship all crew dressed
in white uniform rolling a red carpet on front of him and when was on the top of the stairs weaver smiling good bye... seen
in another dream how or wealth will be stolen and what I will hold... so many things like that..
This is one of the problems that often hinders dialogue with radical atheists (not sure you are one, but you did answer a question I posed to people who
believe God is a fantasy)--
rather than offer a defense they will attack
in such a way as to obfuscate the purpose of the original discussion.
Rather, what we are asked
in baptism is whether we
believe in God the Father who created us,
in God the Son who redeemed us, and
in God the Holy Spirit who dwells
in us and who is the Lord and giver of divine life.
In language that hinted at what was to come, it declared: «We
believe that planned parenthood, practiced with respect for human life, fulfills
rather than violates the will of
God....
Rather, the temporal Temple was a dwelling place for the Spirit that now rests upon those who
believe thus the rending of the veil
in the temple and the subsequent near - razing of the temple at Jesus» death (how is that for confirmation by
God the Father that it was His initiative and
in Jesus was there the finality of the Great Work of Saving Power upon the latter's resurrection).
I heard a wise man once say that he would
rather live his life
in peace knowing
God on earth, only to find out there is no
God, than to live a life of not
believing, only to find out that He is and they are condemned forever.
I am
rather disturbed that she could love and worship a
God who, according to my interpretation (or possibly misinterpretation) of what the bible says, would send me to eternal torment where there is wailing and gnashing of teeth, simply because I can not find it within myself to
believe in him.
Their goal is the establishment of
God's kingdom on earth, and they hold that Jesus who is
believed to be
God's first creation
rather than one person
in a trinity is
God's agent
in this plan.
Like all idolaters, we have so deified our culture - forming abilities that we
believe we can shape our world
in ways subject only to our own desires,
rather than to the norms
God has built into his creation.
Rather than
believe that
God exists and that He acts
in our behalf, there will be some physical reason for the event or issue.
I
believe I would
rather put my faith
in God than I would scientists.
Truth is, when you say you would
rather believe in one of the Abrahamic
gods just to be safe you are admitting that you are only willing to
believe in god to save your ass.
I would
rather believe in God and be wrong than not
believe in God and be wrong.
Most importantly, note this: I am a Christian, I'm gay, I'm a recovering alcoholic, I
believe in Evolution, I
believe the universe is 13 billion years old and that the Earth is 4.5 or so billion years old, I
believe man evolved from lower primates and that Adam was the first man who
God gave a soul and sentience, I do not
believe in hell but I do
believe in Satan, I do not
believe the Bible is a book of rules meant to imprison man or condemn him but that it is
rather a «Human Existence for Dummies» guide, I
believe Christ was the son of
God but I do not
believe Christianity is the only «valid» religion, I do not
believe atheists will go to hell, while the English Bible says
God should be feared, the Hebrew word used for fear, «yara», such as that used
in the Book of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spider.
You said you don't
believe in god, Isn't it
rather pointless to then describe the characteristics of this
god you DO N'T
believe in
Perhaps if there were any evidence at all that any
god exists, I would change my mind, but at this time it seems
rather silly to
believe in a fantasy just because it's popular.
It would be nice if it turned out that it was another
God who actually
believed in the concept behind the Golden Rule and judged everyone based on performance
rather than whether or not they
believed in something he refused to prove.
at the end of the day i'd
rather have an agnostic or atheist as president than someone who
believes in some fairy tale, or thinks that
god tells people what to do, or that religion is necessary for morals.
I am not crediting
God, but I'd
rather have a doctor who
believes in something bigger than us all, than a cold atheist who doesn't have hope, or pray and isn't driven by anything
in life other than a selfish belief that he is the most intelligent thing
in the universe.
I don't
believe in a theistic
God, but if there were one, I would
rather face this being with my integrity intact,
rather than as a sycophant.
I
believe from what I see
in scripture that
God most often allows a natural disaster to occur
rather than directly sending one.
I decided that
rather than be boxed
in by the dualistic question «Do I
believe in God?
I don't happen to agree that adding the word
god makes something a prayer because I do not
believe that prayer works and if you think that puts me
in line with a life
in hell, so be it... I'd
rather be anywhere that the likes of you and your kind aren't.
These teachings were not the program of a twentieth century liberal to bring
in the Kingdom of
God;
rather, they were the absolute demand of the Kingdom itself which Jesus
believed would come at any moment.
Those who
believe that miracles are refuted by modern science may view them symbolically
rather than literally, saying, for example, that the stilling of the storm (Mark 4:35 - 41) shows that
God is with the believer
in the storms of life.
Isn't it smarter to
believe in God rather than finding out later on that He does exist but that would be late
I'd much
rather spend my life
believing, living my life as if there IS a heaven as a reward, having the comfort of thinking that
God will be there when I draw my last breath, and being comforted with the thought as I watch the world go to hell
in a hand - basket... and not be aware after death that I was wrong because, as Hawking says..
Many no long just don't
believe in God, but
rather get so worked up about the faith of other people.
@Trey «I really would like an explanation from some well - meaning, Bible -
believing evangelical as to why
God would allow good people to be tormented forever
in hell... or,
rather, why hell was created (for people)
in the first place.»
That can seem a cheap way to force someone to
believe in God through fear,
rather than rely on principle.
I really would like an explanation from some well - meaning, Bible -
believing evangelical as to why
God would allow good people to be tormented forever
in hell... or,
rather, why hell was created (for people)
in the first place.
The reason they are mnot saved is because of lawlessness
rather than being obedience to
Gods word they
believed in Jesus Christ but because of there hearts did not walk according to the word and because it speaks of signs and wonders it seems more about them and the works that they did.Of course none of us are saved by works.How do you understand that passage as some are saved and some are not it seems clear that to be saved we must
believe and also walk
in obedience to
Gods word.brentnz A Tree and its Fruit mat 7: 2Many will say to Me on that day, «Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy
in Your name, and
in Your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?»
But if we unreservedly
believe in God, accepting our responsibility to him and hoping
in eternal life, this faith will also help us to bear the narrowness and boredom of our life, which has today become worse
rather than better.
I
believe it is the responsibility of all those who disagree with Richard Dawkins»
rather superficial and juvenile conclusions about the biblical text, to create space for a deeper discussion around the way
in which we work with it and, as a consequence, who we understand
God to be.
Am not anti-Christ nor Anti-Jewish just like all Muslims am a monotheist so must be
rather Anti-Polytheists & Disbelievers... but
believe me it is not hatred but
rather pityness for the innocents and hardness towards the wicked transgressors... Guess that is all about it unless few of our brother got the message wrong!?! Since we learned from the Quran verses that there will be
in paradise from the Jews, Christian and others from other beliefs... and since
God forgives any thing else other than to assign for him partners as polytheists do, then that means many of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards
God although might show otherwise of fears from dominant doctrine... As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having
God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...!?
He'd
rather believe in God while living on earth, being a good and moral person then die and found out there was no
God, than to not
believe there is a
God, do whatever he pleased, to die and find out there is a
God.
I have family who would
rather right off family members due to a political stand regarding moral social issues than to think for just a moment that the Christian
God I
believe in is similar to the Jesus depicted
in the New Testament.
well let me just say that we will find out one day that
God does not answer to us...
rather we answer to
God... your problem is with
God... but then again u do nt
believe in God... so therefore your problem does not exist....
How about a study, that religious Americans are more likely to support a war or blame all troubles on
God,
rather than themselves... You
believe or don't all you want, but please stop misleading people, with worthless studies and instead put more energy and resources to help those
in need...
If you must chose a deity to
believe in why would you chose such a mean one as the bible's
god, there are many options and many are
rather fun loving and do not require that you hate and kill your neighbor.
We have too often sought
God logically
in the «left brain»
rather than expanding our use of the right hemisphere of the brain where intuitive, prayerful, loving, visual thinking occurs — where we pray,
believe, love and develop a consciousness of the total mind - body - spirit relationship.
But I also teach my kids to think, and not confine the
God that we
believe in to the rules that can fit
in a
rather small book.
It is to the point where my agnostic friend would
rather be inclined to
believe in God rather than concede to the type of world view that an atheist runs with, which is by far the most deluded and unintelligent among them all.
Please notice the kind of
God I am talking about here is not some force
in the universe as is
believed in many of the eastern religions, but
rather a
God that is a person, and this person is different from that which he created.
I definitely do not
believe in God... or
rather I don't like this approach.
That once they
believed in Gods promised deliverence, their sin was no longer what defined them, but
rather the righteousness of the Messiah credited to their account before
God.
He
believed that his doctrine of original sin was but a commentary on Paul's thought, such as
in Romans 1:24 - 25: «Therefore
God gave them up
in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about
God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature
rather than the Creator.»
Rather than point out what I
believe to be his sins, I will look for what I can find of
God's image
in him, and will honor him
in every way I can.
Rather than cause a degree of contrition and caution amongst the more militant atheists, the Texas Church Massacre has apparently caused even further justification for their anger against the
God they don't
believe in.