It becomes
a rather beautiful film about different generations of women from the same family and how they're not quite the strangers they think they are.
Both stars are already receiving great praise for their roles, and under the watchful eye of Anton Corbijn whose excellent Control captured later Joy Division singer Ian Curtis so profoundly, it's safe to assume we'll be getting a touching, insightful, and
rather beautiful film.
It's also a charming, surprising, admittedly flawed but still
rather beautiful film.
Not exact matches
While he would have been comfortable with the rest of the
film, Ian Fleming would have been turning in his grave if he thought his creation might be turned into a sexual experimenter
rather than an alpha male conqueror of
beautiful women.
I was not one of A
Beautiful Mind's historical accuracy Nazis, who used the
film's marginalization of the real John Nash as a way to bash the
film (for my money, it was the horrid screenplay and direction that made it such a painful
film to watch, not its artistic rewriting of history), though the erasing of Turing in Enigma is
rather distressing.
Spielberg and his screenwriter, Robert Rodat, have done a subtle and
rather beautiful thing: They have made a philosophical
film about war almost entirely in terms of action.
A
beautiful but
rather hollow
film.
It's an emotionally involving
rather than harrowing
film, with scenes as
beautiful as oil paintings.
For Denis»
film - which may be her most intricately constructed and intensely
beautiful to date - is one that transcends words and stories, a movie to be felt
rather than rationalized.
Todd Haynes follows up his resplendent Carol, with an effective and unique family
film, touching in a
rather distant way, and hauntingly
beautiful to look at and to listen to.
mmm... a protagonist who complete dominates a long
film to the detriment of context and the other players in the story (though the abolitionist, limping senator with the black lover does gets close to stealing the show, and is
rather more interesting than the hammily - acted Lincoln); Day - Lewis acts like he's focused on getting an Oscar
rather than bringing a human being to life - Lincoln as portrayed is a strangely zombie character, an intelligent, articulate zombie, but still a zombie; I greatly appreciate Spielberg's attempt to deal with political process and I appreciate the lack of «action» but somehow the context is missing and after seeing the
film I know some more facts but very little about what makes these politicians tick; and the lighting is way too stylised,
beautiful but unremittingly unreal, so the
film falls between the stools of docufiction and costume drama, with costume drama winning out; and the second subject of the
film - slavery - is almost complete absent (unlike Django Unchained) except as a verbal abstraction
While there are standout examples — like Darren Aronofsky's disorienting, eye - opening Requiem for a Dream, or the achingly
beautiful narratives of animated animal - people addicts in BoJack Horseman — sagas like this one usually work better on the page than on the screen; the brief gloss of
film can make drug use seem
rather too appealing, while the idea of spending eight TV seasons with an addict seems
rather unappealing.
The movie's unexpectedly goofy sense of humor helps to keep things light, and the actors do a good job with the material they've been given, but «
Beautiful Creatures» doesn't feel like it was made by a studio that loved the books, but
rather the idea of success that a
film adaptation might bring — all business and no soul.
by Bryant Frazer Before Krzysztof Kieslowski became the standard - bearer for the latter - day European art
film with ravishing portraits of unspeakably
beautiful women living their lives under unutterably mysterious circumstances, he was a gruff but adventurous chronicler, in both documentary and narrative
films, of lives lived in the
rather more drab surroundings of communist Poland.
Unlike other
films in the subgenre, this isn't a series of CliffsNotes or the greatest hits of a former first lady's life, but
rather an entirely subjective, visceral, upsetting and sometimes
beautiful experience.
Interesting, too, is the inescapable idea that the only genuinely convincing relationships in the
film are homosexual, and that the picture could be read with profit as an escalating evolution of father relationships from low to positively Christian (mad steward Denethor and son Faramir, Frodo and Gollum, Gandalf and the hobbits, Aragorn and mankind)-- but part and parcel with the oft - fascinating subtext and
beautiful images is a parade of useless cameos (please, enough Cate Blanchett), de rigueur expository flashbacks, and the squandering of opportunities to locate the genuine interest in unlikely epic heroes (women and, essentially, children),
rather than just pay lip service to them.
Unsurprisingly, Little Nicky isn't a satirical indictment of the consumer culture of the twenty - first century but
rather follows the familiar mould that usually involves the audience being introduced to an unlikeable half - wit, who surprises both us and inexplicably a
beautiful woman by improving and getting slightly less detestable over the first half of the
film, before losing our confidence with a stupid mistake and then winning it back again with a rousing finale.
Annihilation's cryptic coda is all but begging to be unpacked and picked apart, yet once again I'd
rather just sit and be haunted by these pictures and sounds, letting the
film wash over me like a terrible,
beautiful dream.
The movie's unexpectedly goofy sense of humor helps to keep things light, but «
Beautiful Creatures» doesn't feel like it was made by a studio that loved the books, but
rather the idea of success that a
film adaptation might bring — all business and no soul.
Three big talents worked on Three Comrades, and though they butted heads, and the
film came out
rather uneven, there are still enough wonderful,
beautiful moments to make it worth seeing.
Since Silent Hill is stunningly
beautiful with its Innsmouth - style of fog and moisture texture, will you render the
film (if post-production isn't already completed) with a more «amateur / gritty» texture, or will the
film break from tradition, and although be visually appealing, have a feel that centers more around character
rather than franchise norms?
The moment of each transformation, moreover, becomes impossible to pinpoint, because the identities do not strictly mutate but overlap or interface —
rather like the colored geometric shapes that traverse the screen in the
film's
beautiful opening credits.
They are definitely
beautiful images, with cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki doing superb Oscar - bound work, but Malick's determination to recreate every nuance of his childhood era becomes a hindrance in such a long,
rather shapeless
film.
He also performs a brief, and somewhat amazing, reading from «Hamlet» and a
rather beautiful piece of his own composition on piano during the
film's affecting conclusion.
From the
beautiful and intimate score by Mychael Danna, to the inspired production design by David Gropman, to the pitch perfect performances by Suraj Sharma, Irrfan Patel and others, this movie is one of those rare
films that brings its audience a mesmerizing experience
rather than just a couple of hours of entertainment.
Overall, the
film works better as a collection of
beautiful images
rather than as a cohesive narrative.
Its characterization of the madness that begins to slowly engulf city - bred Genevieve (Kate Lyn Sheil) in the countryside is
rather sketchy, and its depiction of the sexual jealousy she begins to develop toward earnest country girl Robin (Takal herself) doesn't go far beyond Eyes Wide Shut lite; still, the
film packs a wallop, with a pungently atmospheric score by Ernesto Carcamo and some unnervingly prolonged long takes (Nandan Rao was the cinematographer) that offers an unsettling counterpoint to the
beautiful scenery and naturalistic performances.