Not exact matches
It may seem surprising to people, but you can look at something like Mars, which has a very thin
atmosphere, and you can look at something like Venus which we tend to think of as sort of having this
rather heavy, clouded
atmosphere, which [is] hellishly warm because of runaway greenhouse effect, and on both of those planets you are seeing this phenomenon of the
atmosphere leaking away, is actually what directly has led to those very
different outcomes for those planets; the specifics of what happened as the
atmosphere started to go in each case [made] all the difference.
It takes a completely
different approach from the other games, going all in for
atmosphere and tension,
rather than the grotesque.
In 2) i wanted to discuss the
different forcing efficacies of solar shortwave compared to anthro fossil carbon combustion upon global average surface temperature,
rather than the emission temperature at top of
atmosphere
In a subtly
different interpretation than Lovelock, Schwartzman sees Gaia as more of a co-evolution of organisms and
atmosphere rather than regulation by the biota.
Rather, they represent a range of possible futures, consistent with
different concentrations of greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere.
Rather, the intrinsic thermal lapse between two reservoirs at
different temperatures creates the convection that establishes a self - consistent lapse in the
atmosphere in between, which can be enormously complex because once the convective forces exceed certain limits, the convective flow becomes turbulent.
The complexity of all
different processes influencing the removal rate of CO2 from the
atmosphere has lead to the conclusion that it deviates strongly from exponential, but can be presented by a sum of several exponentials over a
rather wide range of concentration.
The reality will be
rather different If we continue to emit ever - greater quantities of CO2 and other greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere, then average global temperatures will rise by 2 °C over the next three decades compared to pre-industrial times.
It is also not some universal constant for doubling CO2, but
rather is unique to the modern
atmosphere and can change with
different overlap with other gases, or even at
different CO2 concentration regimes (the logarithmic forcing breaks down for example at very low or very high concentrations).
What is important is not the exchanges between these
different subsystems but
rather the additions to the overall system consisting of the
atmosphere + biosphere + ocean mixed layer.
Should the climate negotiations try to cap CO2 pollution in the
atmosphere at 550 parts per million (ppm), 450 ppm, or some other (hopefully lower) figure Or should we take an entirely
different approach and try to cap temperature change itself,
rather than CO2 pollution And what must we know about the kinds of impacts and instabilities that can be expected at any given level View Full Text»