Not exact matches
And then there's the idea that this is a bipartisan problem - of
extreme positions and uncompromising rhetoric -
rather than one the anti-environmental right created.
I would argue that February's VIX spike was the result of
extremes in
positioning rather than underlying fundamentals.
It's more
extreme than the avowed
position of any recent US Administration — even the invasion of Iraq was purportedly justified on the basis of UN resolutions,
rather than US self - interest.
This
position is very strict and, from my view, overshoots the mark — possibly on the basis of
rather extreme assumptions of irrational consumer behaviour such as those presented in paragraph 38 of the Judgment (which, in my view, do not seem to represent the actual behaviour of the average consumer or would, at least, have deserved some further evidentiary support).
To read more into a statement like that in that context without clarifying if what he literally said is really what he meant is really just playing «gotcha»
rather than trying to determine if there is really a new policy or if the NSA director is really taking such an
extreme position.
In fact, cases with a high degree of conflict often benefit the most from the collaborative model, with its emphasis on problem - solving
rather than taking
extreme positions and refusing to compromise.