Sentences with phrase «rather fundamental points»

The most interesting point about these wide divergences between different Tribunals on rather fundamental points of EU and international law is how little they seem to matter.

Not exact matches

Rather, it is to suggest that human experience is merely one point on a practically infinite continuum of experiences and that other points on this fundamental cosmological continuum may be almost infinitely different from the human in intensity and quality of experience.

A fundamental point that must be understood early on in this discussion is that the crime of child sexual abuse is not merely a personal offense, but rather it is an urgent public concern.

I don't find that I agree completely with your points, because I think that they are ways in which the original idea of the group system has been corrupted, be that through dishonesty, works theology etc., rather than a fundamental issue with the system in general.

One way to contrast archaic and modern society, or rather the modern West and all traditional societies, archaic or historic, is to point out, as Louis Dumont following Alexis de Tocqueville has been doing in recent years, that traditional societies are characterized by hierarchy whereas modern societies are characterized by equality — at least in ideal.6 This contrast is rooted not just in political ideology but in fundamental conceptions of the nature of reality.

Rather it is to say that it is a mistake to think, as Muray appears to think, that it is possible to identify them as moral errors from some abstract point of view such as «fundamental reality itself» (91), or «whatever contributes to the enhancement of relationality and creativity» (92) of this reality or even such a pseudo-concretization as «the challenges of today» (92).

Persons of faith should be deeply concerned about the current surveillance flap not because privacy is an absolute end in itself but rather because it points to and safeguards something else even more basic and fundamental, namely, human dignity.

Rather the point is that their dominating the game (according to pretty much any objective metric you want to use, but big chances will do) means that focusing on Lacazette's misses right at the end is overlooking the more fundamental problems that led to our being in the position we were in with 89 minutes on, and indeed «deserving» to be down a lot more, if only they had finished the numerous eminently finish - able chances they had.

Within the context of the prisons crisis, a focus on inspection reports rather than a fundamental rethink really seems to be missing the point.

«Contrary to what is commonly believed, the amount and generosity of the benefits are not the elements that most discourage the return to work; rather the fundamental influence would be the length of time that benefits last,» he points out.

At its heart is the idea that the fundamental particles we observe are not point - like dots, but rather tiny strings that are so small that our best instruments can not tell that they are not points.

My point was that he, or another large owner, may decide to sell some or all of a position for liquidity reasons rather than because they don't like company fundamentals.

While its single - player portion is rather shallow and is undoubtedly a secondary point of concern, both online and local multiplayer are extremely robust and are the fundamental crux as to why ARMS is such a delight.

Perhaps unexpectedly, the primary concerns of Michael Dean's (b. 1977) Government do not include satire, contemporary politics or acerbic finger pointing and it is refreshing to encounter an exhibition with such a value - laden title that is concerned instead with the fundamental worth of the term rather than its party - political resonance.

And all of this leaves untouched the fundamental point that concentrating on the contiguous USA rather than global temperatures is a cherry pick of mammoth proportions.

Lewandowsky has a habit of raising fundamental truths1 and asking pertinent questions, yet then for the climate change domain turning psychology (and according to analyses his data and ethics too) on its head in order to ensure an agreement with his über - orthodox viewpoint on risk2, rather than embrace outcomes that the fundamentals and questions actually point to.

If there is an error in Prof. Salby's article (and there is a very clear and fundamental error in his Sydney Institute presentation) then it is to his own advantage for it to be pointed out in review rather than after it has been published.

Before delving into its analysis, the Court pointed out that employers do not have a duty to change their working conditions in a fundamental way — rather, they only have a duty (to the point of undue hardship) to ensure that it arranges an employee's workplace / duties in a way that will enable the employee to do his or her work.

But apart from the (rather fundamental) rule of law point — that obligations need to have some legal authority for them to be binding — if they do want to impose such an obligation, it should be expressly set out in the Rules, with a corresponding commentary, so that lawyers know exactly what actions they have to take, or not take, to comply with their obligation (and, crucially, aren't at the whim of arbitrary diktats from the LSUC).

Rather, the point is to illustrate the contestability of these matters which, at root, turn upon a normative argument about how the three fundamental principles of the British constitution — the sovereignty of Parliament, the rule of law and the separation of powers — relate to one another.