The following are some of the questions the Office for Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance (ODAPC) has received which did not require an interpretation but
rather a general response.
Not exact matches
The post is so full of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my
response to this post should not be seen as an attack on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but
rather a
response to the
general belief that God's presence is limited to the pages of Scripture and that all forms of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out of hand or regarded with suspicion.
I'm curious what your
response to all of this would be if HL did not have corporate status, but was
rather simply an assumed business name of a company owned by an individual (or a group as a
general partnership).
Perhaps the point of Jesus» question was not to make a
general statement about natural disasters, but
rather to evoke a
response similar to that of the Pharisees, who after being asked a similar question, turned and dropped their stones.
If they do so, it will probably be because of their ideological beliefs in
general rather than because of an automatic female
response of empathy.
It seems to have gone out to out her
general list
rather than the Twitter posse specifically, because it encourages people to «join The Briefing», the campaign's rapid -
response team.
Now my
response was
rather skeptical (as a vegan who would never eat gelatin even if all this was true)-- but I also believe that we must always look at the facts scientifically... so I would really appreciate your scientific opinion on these health claims for what I think is maybe the latest health fad going around, and are their the same risks associated with gelatin as other animal proteins in
general?
This trend was most likely developed in more of a consumer
response to human nutrition trends,
rather than responding to the nutritional needs of our pets in
general.
There's often a
general lack of race craft and personality evident, and an over-aggressive
response to car - v - car situations seems the result of clumsy number crunching
rather than a more excusable virtual win - at - all - costs passion.
Jim Bouldin says in
response to Walt: «I see a bunch of people who'd
rather pursue technological hail - mary passes than do the hard work of energy conservation, forest conservation, alternative energy development, and
general lifestyle changes.»
I'd much
rather, when all was said and done, be remembered as one of the ones with the valid criticisms, but to err is human, and to find a
response that leads to a temporary cessation of stupidity is as good for the very bright as for the very dim, if it has a more
general application.
First, it's noteworthy how opinion has solidified on the point that bleaching (corals expelling their associated symbiotic zooxanthellae) is a
response to higher temperature driven by
general warming of the seas,
rather than being due to locally specific causes.
Rather, the aim is to provide a more
general account of the governments»
responses.