Now, we have
a rather high certainty that El Nino will continue throughout at least the next 4 - 6 months.
Not exact matches
We don't know, but for important institutions we need a
high level of
certainty that key decision - makers are exercising their judgment in the interests of those they serve,
rather than themselves.
Since the best psychiatrist can not predict who will kill others or e selves with any
certainty, there is a
high risk that suicides will actually increase
rather than decrease as intended.
We try to get around this by talking about
high - level themes,
rather than detailed deliverables, which gives
certainty over the direction and focus, but flexibility in terms of how we actually achieve things.
The situation as I see it is opposite: Mainstream science acknowledges there is a large uncertainty in the net aerosol forcing, whereas Lindzen picks onevalue at the outer edge of the probability distribution function and builds his entire argument on that (
rather improbable) value as if it's highly certain: His argument is implicitly built on
high confidence /
certainty that aerosol forcing is very low.