Sentences with phrase «rather know the meaning»

, but I would rather know the meaning and implication.

Not exact matches

An analyst note from CIBC echoed that view, adding that the changes could be a result of a refocus on the company on daily execution rather than strategy, which meant it no longer needed «more experienced leaders.»

The quest for more «business agility» means that employees whose work is presumably no longer relevant or needed will be cut sooner rather than later.

This does not mean I am making buckets of money, but rather that I can now recognise my mistakes, I am no longer watching my account diminish but beginning to grow, albeit very slowly.

The relative lack of liquidity in the bond market and the fact that it is oriented for institutional investors rather than retail investors means that you really want to know where a bond has been trading before agreeing to buy or sell at a given price (be careful not to get ripped off).

This means that they are much better suited to recognising any warning signs in the company performance, know the impact of any key personnel leaving, and are not worried if earnings over a cycle are «lumpy» rather than the perfect, consistent increases in earnings that managers with a more short - term outlook prefer.

That might mean outsourcing tasks rather than having to own the expensive real estate for vineyards and tasting rooms — and finding innovative ways to bring the wine to small towns, and big cities, as the son of a well - known California winemaker has done.

Facebook's rather shady move out of Ireland however, means that users outside of Europe will no longer be able to file their complaints about the use of their data with the Irish data protection commissioner.

Therefore it isn't that God knows «what we do» before we do them, rather, it means that God knows «us» before we can do anything.

MBANE You mean they focus on practising what they understand rather than carping unecessarily about whast they don't know or understand.

It is no wonder that many turn away from Christianity, for your comments are often mean and spiteful, rather than following the apostle's Paul's words: «Let your words always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should answer each person.»

Many other translations, following the translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek known as the Septuagint, speak of a «virgin» rather than a young woman, although the Hebrew word means a young woman and not necessarily a virgin.

But, in my experience, sometimes the best way to keep communication healthy and open is to go to bed angry and then talk about it the next morning when you've had enough sleep to know that leaving the milk out in the car probably wasn't a veiled act of aggression meant to symbolize every problem in the relationship, but rather just the sort of mistake anyone would make while distracted by a fascinating story on NPR.

We have here an updated version of Kant's criticism of the Leibnizian monad in the «Amphiboly» in the Critique of Pure Reason: the spatially situated existent is indeed made up of relations rather than being a substance containing its «inhering» attributes internally as predicates which are part of its concept; only the relations are no longer those of the synthetically connected manifold, but the relational connections between the particulars of modern functional or mathematical logic, expanded to include within itself the spatial and temporal relations which Kant could only account for by means of the synthetic a priori.

This means that putting on the sandals is not accomplished just by knowing what the Gospel message is, but rather by having prepared a plan to share the Gospel with other people.

While it maybe be true that large pools of institutional money are better at buying political favors, influencing scientific research, and swaying foreign governments, it has always been known and is frequently demonstrated that individuals always do better at loving and caring for other individuals, tend to be wiser stewards of money, and view their giving and service toward others as a means of actually helping them, rather than a means to gain political power or popular prestige.

I love Jesus and I do feel that he had died for each and everyone of our sins and I feel we are all loved equally no matter what we do rather it be for murder to just plain old coursing He loves us all honestly I've debated in my mind that if Christianity is about being mean hateful and thinking that you're going around better than everybody then that's not the religion for me

Gaddis observes: «That, however, was simply a restatement of what Eisenhower had long since concluded: that the advent of thermonuclear weapons meant that war could no longer be an instrument of statecraft — rather the survival of states required that there be no war at all.»

Hartshorne connects the ideas of relative and absolute in the act of knowing: «Unrestricted or literal relativity; so far from being the mere de facto character of our inferior human knowledge, is rather the precise ideal of knowledge in its most absolute meaning» (DR 10).

«13 Gerhard von Rad recalls with approval the suggestion of the Jewish biblical scholar Franz Rosenzweig: we ought no longer to think of the symbol R as standing for Redactor but rather, for Rab benu, which means, in Hebrew, our master»; since for the final form in which we receive the work, we are indebted to him and to his interpretation.14 His was the same historical perspective which gave rise to this prayer:

She didn't mean any harm, but when we don't know what another person has been through, it's best to err on the side of caution rather than assuming the person just left, deserted the ship, or whatever else people might think.

I would be very curious to know how or why you believe my rather sarcastic use of the term «the religious» as a means of differentiating them from people of sincere faith (ANY sincere conviction btw — Not just Protestant) is «specious».

«Trinity» did not originally mean, as it does for some later, that there are three kinds of revelation, the Father speaking through creation and the Spirit though experience, by which the words and example of the Son must be corrected; it meant rather that language must be found and definitions created so that Christians, who believe in only one God, can affirm that he is most adequately and bindingly known in Jesus.

There emerge, however, from the «periphery» (so to speak) rather than from the center, pockets of order, meaning, and value which grow, spread, and die — that order, those values, and those meanings which gradually grew and spread until they constituted the various Kingdoms of Ancient Egypt would be an example of how order, value, and meaning emerge from the «bottom» and spread «upward» and «outwards» into dynamic pockets or aggregates of order, meaning, and value which prosper - overcoming and absorbing other pockets of order — until they no longer embody the imagination, vigor, and zest required for continued vitality and find themselves absorbed into other competing orders or gradually disintegrating into the silence of a Dark Age.

To recognize this «given - ness» does not mean to accept the political or economic status quo, as if it reflected presumed orders of nature; it is rather to acknowledge that limits in knowing, as elsewhere, accompany our (common) existence as human beings.

Andrew didn't get how it would all work out, but he put his best solution forward, not because he actually thought it would solve everything, but because he knew that trusting Jesus means not having every answer, but rather being obedient with what you've got and trusting Him for the miracle.

One no longer need do and think just what had been done and thought, and the mythical meanings by which man had lived so long were now problematic rather than simply given.

Also Hartshorne asks what Westphal can mean when he says «what God wills (in terms of our discussion, God's decision to know this contingent world rather than another) he wills eternally.»

And the disciples knew the impact of Jesus was so great that titles could not define him, but rather his reality would determine the true meaning of any titles used of him.

RD.. How path - et - ic to see your hate and fear driving you to death...!?! Man pull your self together and have the courage to face the returns of your deeds... Wars were always there in life whether were religious or not so stop doing it on your self... Beside learn to wish people well whether you agree or disagree with might you succeed in life rather than being a loser... by being a cowered... My posts were meant for the friendly people I had known for some time, whom I found they were full of compassion and not for black hearted one's like you who hate all God creations...

They do not mean «No, God» in the sense you seem to think, an address to God communicating «no» rather than «yes», i.e. a refusal to obeNo, God» in the sense you seem to think, an address to God communicating «no» rather than «yes», i.e. a refusal to obeno» rather than «yes», i.e. a refusal to obey.

No, this straitness means rather that each must himself become an individual, that through this needle's eyes he must press forward to the narrow way where no comparison cools, but yet where no comparison kills with its insidious cooling.

Recalling our earlier discussion of the different senses in which Hartshorne uses the word «literal,» we can infer that what he means by saying that «know» or «love» may be literal as applied to God is not that they may apply to God in the same sense in which they apply to all individuals, but, rather, that they may apply to God in the primary sense in which they are thus applicable, their application to any other individual being secondary.

In 1975 there appeared in Germany a book entitled: The Berlin Ecumenical Manifesto, on the Utopian Vision of the World Council of Churches, edited by Walter Kunneth and Peter Beyerhaus.34 The book attacked not only the World Council of Churches but also the Lutheran World Federation, World Student Christian Federation, certain Roman Catholic groups, the German Evangelical Kirchentag, Taize, and to some extent even Lausanne.35 According to H. Berkof, the common thread through all the articles in the book was the desire to demonstrate that the World Council of Churches no longer sought to proclaim the Gospel throughout the world, but strove rather for a purely horizontal, social and political, humanization and unification of mankind by means of religious pluralism and syncretism.

The reflection stops the assertion cold, and he writes, «I mean, rather, that I have been known.»

The right knows this full well, but they'd rather watch the horsey dance and would do anything at all to protect the status quo — even if it means losing their jobs, their retirement accounts, and their homes.

Rather it means the church will never accept an «attitude of resignation» toward the truth, the assumption that truth can not be known.

In the Old Testament, God is known as Creator only because he is first known as Sustainer - Redeemer.27 The creation faith of the Old Testament nowhere gives the impression that its Primary interest is in origins as origins; rather is it a faith that speaks from, and back to, historical human existence and in its articulation is concerned to say what man is and what in that faith his existence means.

None sense is your you thrive chad — they, the people you mentioned, are those who interpret... do you know the definition of interpret — to explain the meaning of... not that they KNOW the meaning of, they are rather taking the best guess humanly possible using the evidence availaknow the definition of interpret — to explain the meaning of... not that they KNOW the meaning of, they are rather taking the best guess humanly possible using the evidence availaKNOW the meaning of, they are rather taking the best guess humanly possible using the evidence available.

Hope, knowing means that you have some sort of actual correlation with reality due to evidence, rather than just claims that you hope people won't call you on to justify.

Anyhow rather take this short journey to death thinking I know the big man than to die and be nothing but dust (my spirit not the body, it will be dust) It gives life meaning if you die and you become nothing then it don't matter anyway.

It means rather that the difference between so - called good and so - called bad no longer comes into consideration.

I know many atheists, and I guess I would rather live by an inspiring story I knew was mostly wrong than a belief that everything is chance and nothing has meaning beyond the physical realm.

One of the things u shud have asked me rather than recite ur «Believers don't know» creed was what I meant by Matt.

It was the Light because the knew creator was of Light but searched for it in the wrong sources, or made an idole of light sources to worship rather than reading and looking in to ones self by reading the light that is within the books that was meant for them to read thing and believe in to submission!.

Rather, every unitary reality, including every material entity, is actual and knowable because it is known by God within the dynamic and interlocking framework of other created beings, and they are simultaneously contingent and provisional in so far as they are intrinsically dependent andstructured towards meanings beyond themselves within that environmental framework.

we all tend to fear what we do not know - rather than take someone else's word for it explore for yourself - take a yoga class at the Y or the local yoga studio - tune into your own experience - your own feelings - yoga is NOT a religious practice and never has been - it is a process of yoking (yoga means to yoke or to join) body and mind - when body and mind are integrated we experience the NOW - peace - and that leads the to experience of ONEness - we are all connected - I am you, you are me - be love my loves - be love...

It is not only a question of knowing when and how the universe arose physically, or when man appeared, but rather of discovering the meaning of such an origin: is the universe governed by chance, blind fate, anonymous necessity, or by a transcendent, intelligent and good Being called «God»?

This message, however, does not mean, as it has often been interpreted, that the Judgment no longer means anything to him who believes in Christ, but rather that he alone survives the Judgment who has become a new man through faith in Christ, who has «passed from death to life» and hence belongs among those who «by patient continuance in well - doing seek for eternal life.»

8:12) leave no doubt as to Jesus» meaning: Jonah brought the people of Nineveh none of those predicted apocalyptic signs, but rather he himself, his call to repentance, was the one and only signal that was given them.