Sentences with phrase «rather old post»

I know this is a rather old post but I am just now getting to it in my inbox.

I know this is a rather old post, but you mentioned how you use dropbox to share your folders and that it can be a bit of a hassle to make sure you both are not updating at the same time.

Wow, nice to see there are other people that can't stand her although this is a rather old post.

* I see this is a rather old post but I'm looking forward to making this recipe!

Not exact matches

I am a 26 - year old female entrepreneur and have spent the past 10 months developing an online marketplace where sellers post a video of their item rather than pictures and descriptions.

No, that is an observation against the moron that does not think but rather posts some tired old video.

In a post yesterday I suggested that the proliferation of choices for «gender identity» (legend has it that there are now 57 varieties to choose from on facebook) will have the effect of deconstructing the very notion of gender difference — or rather, to use the old and proper terminology, the difference between the sexes, male and female.

This past Sunday, the Snoop Dogg posted a video to Instagram of himself singing an old Gospel song, «I'd Rather Have Jesus.»

During my month of non-blogging (which feels suspiciously like it's morphing into two months of non-blogging, except that I'm typing this right now) I did re-photograph some old recipes, but then as I was placing the new photos into the old blog posts I found that it's honestly easier to write a whole new post because I used to write my recipes into the post rather than a focused recipe.

The writing of this post began with sadness and loneliness pouring forth from a disquieted mind, with introspection and frustration and words that were important — questions about growing older that, inevitably, must be asked — but it fizzled, never reaching a boil but a rather disappointing simmer that belied the troubles beneath.

«When I feed my 6 - month - old son, I often spend the time sketching out a blog post in my head rather than gazing into his eyes.»

I am VERY NEW to BW and I have a few questions, one of which pertains to this particular post, one not - I will ask both here as Im not exactly sure where to post the other ones... My daughter is 5 weeks old and I did NOT read BW in the beginning but rather took the «advice» of my sister who did BW with all 3 of her kids succesfully.

I would LOVE it, however, if there were more subject - based ways to search older posts (ie, expand the R sidebar «categories» to help parents find this month's sleep for breastfed babies article by Ann Eglash under a more appropriately named category such as «sleep» link, rather than having to search for it under parenting or nutrition?!)

Well, I mean there has to be a reason to post on a five month old post, rather than any of the newer posts.

One key barrier to application seemed to be the university's continuing image as a white, male institution, and appointments, particularly for more senior posts, were assumed to be based on an «old boys network», rather than on merit.

Finally, I read in one of Gertie's old posts about using two small darts, rather than one large one, as a large dart will always end up being pointed.

After Monday's rather «deep post» and complaining about missing the blogging world I fell in love with, I thought what better way to lighten the mood then a good old fashion haul post!

Getting the moribund Postal Service up and running again, however, may be a near - impossible task, what with literally mountains of decades - old undelivered mail clogging every nook and cranny of the broken - down post office building; and with only a few creaky old postmen and one rather unstable, pin - obsessed youth available to deliver it.

According to Mutter's blog, he seems to praise the idea of having someone «with a native digital background» lead the traditional newspaper business rather than repeating the cycle of approaching «an old - time businessman» who would try to restore The Post to its earlier heyday and treat it «like 1953 Plymouths in Cuba.»

Indeed, the reporting is hardly what we've come to expect of the Post — with writer Lisa Grace Lednicer quoting 10 - year - old papers written by longtime TNR opponents David Jessup and Paul Barrows rather than actually contacting them.

Thanks to a post I saw on the Frequent Miler blog I found a link that would open up the old version of the Amex website (here is that link) and, rather surprisingly, when I checked the offers loaded on to my Amex Platinum card there was my missing Amazon.com offer.

It's therefor rather amusing that, having given up on the older strategies, focusing either on the invocation of various explanatory «forcings» or else, as in a blatantly misleading post by Tamino, questioning the logic behind the evidence for a pause, the latest efforts have taken the form of attempts to actually alter the data itself.

A particularly prominent one is Dossier # 5, where the UCS clearly loves (as I pointed out in my July 9 blog post) a document scan out of Greenpeace's old collection (click image below, to enlarge) of the Western Fuels Association's «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) documents — the ones with the so - called «leaked strategy memo to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact».

As I indicated in this old Slaw post, I have been waiting rather impatiently for this announcement ever since I first saw the new Quicklaw demonstrated.

The incredible thing about technology is that it has the effect of leveling the playing field. At one time there was this misguided notion that all attorneys that ended up working for the top law firms were somehow genetically superior to the rest of the legal world. As demonstrated by my favorite book in this last year Outliers, and this post The Outliers of the Law — the old sytem of selecting the best and brightest has no actual grounding in finding the true outliers. In this post by Jordan Furlong supports this idea that the «best and brightest» is a fallacy handed to those attorneys with the best pedigrees and economic situation rather than those most likely to be exceptional attorneys. Don't expect to see this changing any time soon.

Here's an old post from March 2009 that we're making new again, rather than leaving it to wilt in the archives.

Here's an old post from February 2009 that we're making new again, rather than leaving it to wilt in the archives.

I can't speak to how this agent does his business or not, but I found the posts distressing because everything old is new again — or rather — it just never went away.