Not exact matches
If the company had done its due diligence, it would have found that I would
rather pay $ 1 more for the old recipe than the same
price for a
lower quality product.
At Buffer for instance, we have three different
pricing options (free, Awesome, Business), and at the Awesome
price the
price is
lower when
paying a year in advance
rather than month - to - month.
Rather than book any big losses in 2015 and 2016, if they could hang on until 2017 then the big economic boom being predicted would
pay off especially for where junk
prices had been at the
lows.
You must
pay rather high
prices at health - food and fresh produce stores (though the
prices are
lower at co-ops).
Half of the problem While at BESA, we continue to encourage schools to consider the total cost of ownership and not just the initial
price tag, it is important to remember that there are
lower cost tablet devices available,
rather than having to
pay the premium
price tag for the big name consumer brands; some offer schools the ability to purchase twice as many devices for the same cost of another brand and as long as they are BESA members they are more likely to be good products.
I'd
rather give a newbie author who is either self - pubbed or with a small press a chance at a
lower price than
pay that.
Amazon Publishing
pays royalties to both authors and rights holders: For works of at least 10,000 words, authors receive 35 percent of net revenue (based on sales
price rather than the standard, but
lower, wholesale),
paid monthly.
If a stock is a bargain at the
price you
paid, the stock is a better bargain at a
lower price,
rather than a candidate for a quick sale at a loss.
In a possible scenario of 1) years of
low oil
prices 2) a significant portion of trade in oil not
paid in US$ and 3) the Chinese unwilling to stack away more US$ the world's perception on the worth of the US$ might change
rather early.
If you trade options (
rather than either exercising them or letting them expire), you'll also be subject to a bid - ask spread, which is the difference between the highest
price a buyer is willing to
pay and the
lowest price a seller is willing to receive for the option.
In case a company turns out to not be worth as much as you thought, that gap between the
price you
paid and the (now
lower) value of the stock simply closes somewhat
rather than the investment turning upside down on you right away.
@Emily — With home
prices lower than they've been in quite a while, and mortgage rates good as well, I would buy a home
rather than
pay off student loans with your nest egg — assuming you can
pay both a mortgage and the loan payments, and that you could qualify for a mortgage.
Rather than buying a couple bags of
low quality dog food for the same
price you would
pay for 1 bag of Royal Canin, you need to look at the differences in quality between the two prospective companies.
This creates a huge loyalty on the prospective insured who would
rather pay higher premiums, than go with a
lower priced policy with an agent who is not family.
You might have to
pay a higher
price now that you're older, but buying a shorter term — such as 5 or 10 years
rather than 20 — will help
lower the cost.
Rather than
paying for a single trip travel insurance policy each time they travel, which can add up to quite a lot of money, those who travel frequently can purchase an annual multi trip travel insurance policy and get the same coverage for every trip at a
lower overall
price.
Most builders would
rather offer incentives because
lowering home
prices affects future appraisals and upsets existing owners who
paid more.
If a unit is in need of repair rented at a
low price rather than looking at it as a bargain, a tenant can use these issues as justification in court as an excuse for not
paying rent.