Answering his own question, Buterin made his famous and
rather radical claim: «there will be no «killer app» for blockchain technology.»
Not exact matches
The second part of the book is theological
rather than critical or historical, and it advances the
claim that it is precisely the most
radical expressions of the profane in the modern consciousness (Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, Freud, Proust, Kafka and Sartre) that can be dialectically identified with the purest expressions of the sacred.
Not only do such actions represent a
radical departure from past times in America, when government refused to legitimate ethnic - group rights and
claims, but they also encourage a polarization
rather than unification of our diverse population — a trend that can result only in the eventual creation of de jure ethnic and racial geographic enclaves and political parties, with the appointment and election of individuals mandated along racial, religious and ethnic lines.
If, in a few years» time, the SNP is legislating for a citizens» basic income and has embarked upon a thorough reworking of the fiscal status quo then it would have a good
claim to be «
radical» and «bold», but hinting at such widespread reform is
rather different from actually implementing it.
At the MDU we have long argued that only
radical legal reform will halt the rising costs of
claims but recent legal changes have made the problem worse
rather than better.
In truth, the Orange Book was
rather less
radical and
rather more pluralistic than its editors
claimed at the time.
Rubinstein writes: «Chia, Cucchi, Clemente, Mariani, Baselitz, Lüpertz, Middendorf, Fetting, Penck, Kiefer, Schnabel... these and other artists are engaged not (as is frequently
claimed by critics who find mirrored in this art their own frustration with the
radical art of the present) in the recovery and reinvestment of tradition, but
rather in declaring its bankruptcy — specifically, the bankruptcy of the modernist tradition.