At 8:00, Hulme admits that in the mid-1990s, there was «
a rather simplistic understanding» of global warming.
Not exact matches
Along with the evolution of science from a
rather simplistic linear Newtonian perspective to a less reductionistic chaos theory (which should really be called complexity theory) has come a new
understanding of miracles.
(Of course this is as
simplistic as orange and blue balls — but it at least shows some
understanding of the hydrologic cycle and its effect on the energy flows
rather than just looking at the overblown effects of CO2)