Banks and lenders would
rather take less money and keep homeowners in their home making a payment that they can afford, rather than go through the expense of foreclosing on the home, hiring a listing agent, rehabilitating the home, and letting it sit empty on the market for months, only to lose thousands in the process.
I would
rather take less money and have the freedom.
Not exact matches
Proponents, however, predict that even more people will work, because the current welfare system actively discourages welfare receivers from
taking small jobs (if you make
less money per month than you get welfare, that
money is subtracted from welfare, so you end up with the same amount of income whether you work or not) and that the reason for unemployment is
rather lack of jobs than lack of people's motivation to
take them.
Subjects with an inhibited TPJ were
less likely to share the
money and were more likely to
take the
money up front
rather than delay gratification and wait for a larger prize.
I recently saw Would You
Rather, which
took the similar concept of how far one would go for
money, but made it far more theatrical, and ultimately
less believable.
If your credit score is
less than 580, it may be more cost effective to
take the necessary steps to improve your score before
taking out the loan,
rather than putting the
money into a larger down payment.
The VC business has evolved into a world where the challenge is
less about choosing the best entrepreneurs to invest in, but
rather convincing the best entrepreneurs to
take your
money.
We save
money while travelling by
taking public transport as much as possible
rather than a taxi, finding a happy hour at restaurants instead of going out for dinner, we also love to visit local grocery stores and make picnics, we also prefer staying in an area that is
less expensive.