Sentences with phrase «rather than a current value»

In Scotland, pensions are valued by obtaining a CETV of the fund as at the relevant date (i.e. separation)-- and there may be situations where a relevant date value rather than a current value could make a significant difference.

The replacement cost endorsement ensures that the policy pays out replacement cost which is the value to replace that used refrigerator or television with a brand - new one rather than its current value.

Not exact matches

I would prefer to focus on the value I can add to this company rather than what I'm paid at my current job.

It's been difficult for me to determine how my mix of stuff has done vs. a given index because the PersonalCapital You Index feature takes your current portfolio weightings and backdates that rather than accounting for your trades, natural changes in value, added contributions etc

It is likely Keynes would see this mindset reflected in current investment behavior where the focus is often on short - term trading activity in reaction to market noise, i.e., what other market participants are thinking, rather than investment decisions based on the fundamental longer - term value of an enterprise.

If the media industry, in particular, continues the current race to the bottom on price, rather than focusing on business value, it will forever be a commodity.

Finally, rather than falling, if the value of loan approvals was to grow by 2 per cent per month from the November 2003 level until the end of 2004, housing credit growth would be expected to remain at around its current rate of close to 25 per cent.

Most fans would LOVE to have him back at fair market value for a RB, which would be based off the CURRENT RB contracts rather than being overinflated for two years by ONE horrible contract (Adrian Peterson).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

A critical flaw of the current system is that the «slab» structure of the tax causes distortions in the market as rates are applied to the entire value of the property, rather than the marginal value above each threshold.

Investing for dividends is one type of investment strategy, and it can be contrasted with value investing, in which we look at the future prospects of a company rather than its current dividend.

Conversely, growth stocks are highly popular companies that carry a lot of «expectation value» based on future trends rather than current earnings.

LoanMart can approve you for an auto title loan based on factors such as the current street value in your car and your ability to repay the loan rather than solely based on your credit score.

Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVF) uses its own judgment rather than GAAP classification to define current assets in order to decide what is a liquid, i.e., current, asset.

Investors who purchase growth stocks receive returns from future capital appreciation (the difference between the amount paid for a stock and its current value), rather than dividends.

That way they can focus on the firm's value rather than its current market price.

Also surely taking your value of 38.9 m and dividing that by the current 118.148951 m shares gives a fair value 0f 32.9 p rather than 20.8 p.

So with limited potential upside and significant downside (if the remerging of the entities can not be achieved), I will be holding my position and possibly even pruning it if Mr. Market becomes exuberant, rather than increasing my exposure, even though, at the current share price of $ 3.07, there is a 16 % upside to the implied liquidation value.

Or the lender may consider only the current market value of the home rather than any future appreciation when deciding on the monthly payments.

All remaining upside for shareholders is ultimately based on the actual value realised from an Old NTR wind - down (rather than current book values)-- so yes, it takes longer but it maximises value / upside, and investors will have a pretty minimal cost base / net investment in Old NTR anyway.

There is real value in being connected to the current problems of the day, rather than the idleness of «retirement.»

But if you believe in the growth story here, this multiple probably looks about right — in terms of current fair value — i.e. you expect rapid earnings growth, rather than multiple expansion necessarily.

Reassess the actual current value and only buy coverage for that value rather than what it was in the past.

Also rather than just entering the current value, the sheet lets you enter the price and the number of units in your various accounts.

This might offer shareholders an opportunity, for example, to realize a major portion of EIIB's current NAV at book value — rather than the 52 % discount implied by the current share price.

However if at years end stocks are now considered 10 % over valued by those same metrics and your stock allocation is now at 55 % because of the returns then rather than adjusting back down to 50 % perhaps now you adjust your reasonable allocation percentage down to 45 % to reflect to over-valuation that is inherent in the current valuation of the stock market.

Since Virgin America has a cash - based earning system, rather than the usual miles - flown formula, it should come as little surprise that redemptions are also valued according to the current cash value of the desired itinerary at the time of booking.

This caused his articles on the current art scene to be remarkable rather for their Lear ‐ like rages than for any insights of permanent value.

I note with interest your calculation using GISTEMP data, but unless you are committing to the belief that the current low temperatures relative to trend represent an actual reduction in the trend rather than the effects of transient features such as ENSO fluctuations, using the actual temperature value will lead to a poor estimate of the further evolution of the energy imbalance.

Also, the effects of using exchange based values rather than PPP badly understate the current output and wealth of the third world, and the growth rates projected for the developing nations range from very optimistic to just plain looney.

In conclusion, Molot argues that «[a] revised structure would give all of a firm's constituencies what they so badly crave: a law firm focused on long - term, value - added relationships rather than hourly fees and current billings.»

What I think clients are looking for, is to have an experienced lawyer they can trust, who understands their sector and can help deliver value for money solutions to suit their business needs, rather than what many law firms do in the current market — retro - fit their own resources and cost model to how they deliver service rather than listen to the client and understand what the client actually wants.

If your vehicle is totaled, you will receive a payment for the current value of your vehicle rather than its original price.

Life insurance policies are considered to be «valued policies» because they are purchased in finite amounts, rather than designed to pay damages or the then - current value such as property insurance does.

A sensible solution may be to confirm that your home and its contents are insured for replacement value rather than the depreciated value at current market rates.

An actual cash value plan is one that is going to give payouts for the current value of your losses rather than their purchase value.

What differentiates an Indexed UL policy from other types of permanent life insurance used for cash accumulation is that the growth of the policy's cash value is based on the performance of an equity index (usually the S&P 500), excluding dividends, collared by a cap and a floor — rather than based on a flat crediting rate that is established by the insurance carrier and adjusted from time to time (a product referred to as «current assumption universal life»), based on a flat dividend rate that is established by the insurance carrier and adjusted from time to time (a product referred to as «whole life»), or based on the actual investment returns of specific equity investments (a product referred to as «variable universal life»).

The company hope that the holders of Zerocoin will profit from the value of the token increasing rather than how current gambling providers» shareholders profit when the casino beats a punter.

Readily offer the ability to set the amount to pay in USD or other local fiat currency rather than requiring the customer to determine the BTC value based on the current price themselves (at least in cases where the merchant is not generating all - inclusive QR codes containing both the destination address and the price.

Bitcoin's current market value, he claimed, is driven almost entirely by speculation, rather than by any real and present intrinsic value that Bitcoin actually provides.

Bitcoin's current market value, he claimed, is driven almost entirely by speculation, rather than by any real and present

Rather than sitting down and asking questions back and forth, you can see how candidates perform with your current reps.. This doesn't just show job seekers how much you value teamwork, but also actively starts building relationships before they're even hired.

Rather than continuing the current trend of «doing more with less,» as pediatricians take on a wide range of additional responsibilities, payment reforms should reflect the value of pediatricians» time and knowledge, as well as the importance of a pediatrician - led medical home serving as a focal point for the reduction of toxic stress and for the support of child and family resiliency.

FHA Streamline Refinances are the fastest and most simple way for a homeowner with an FHA - insured home loan to refinance their existing mortgage because the FHA allows the home's original purchase price to be used as the current value of the home rather than requiring an appraisal.

The cap rate is always calculated using the current value of the asset, rather than the purchased value of the asset.