The problem with those holding the traditional Free Grace position is not that they confuse the «who» with the «how» but that they arrive at their view from the Scripture
rather than philosophy and man - made paradigms.
For some theologians this has meant that our knowledge of the one God who created heaven and earth comes to us through revelation
rather than philosophy.
Christian acquiescence in this fate can be measured in any number of ways: by the extent to which the Church renounces her inherent «platonism,» thinking and speaking in the language of psychology, sociology, economics, and politics
rather than philosophy (metaphysics) and theology; by the tendency to view the Church not first as sacrament transcending political order, but as a mere mediating institution within that order; by the «political» or «clerical» temptation to equate true ecclesial reform with institutional or curial reform.
Morgan had earlier complained (EEV) about Whitehead's treatment of mind in CN as wholly distinct from nature, and objected to Whitehead's earlier claim that the study of their relations constitutes metaphysics
rather than philosophy of science.
As one concerned with the philosophy of science
rather than philosophy in general, I must take the latter view, recognizing that there is a great deal that science does not and probably never will know.
he needs some coaching I think
rather than philosophy (TH14 and AW gelled perhaps more than Theo).
They can still contribute enormously to a dynamic classroom, especially if they're seen as a «tool,
rather than a philosophy,» as one educator, LoriC, put it in an Edutopia.org discussion.
Not exact matches
«Because of our emphasis on the long - term, we may make decisions and weigh tradeoffs differently
than some companies... We will continue to make investment decisions in light of long - term market leadership considerations
rather than short - term profitability considerations or short - term Wall Street reactions... We aren't so bold as to claim that the above is the «right» investment
philosophy, but it's ours, and we would be remiss if we weren't clear in the approach we have taken and will continue to take.»
The
philosophy of stoicism, founded in Athens by Zeno of Citium in the early 3rd century BC, asserts that virtues (such as wisdom) should be based on behavior,
rather than words.
And my personal
philosophy is I'd
rather be optimistic and wrong
rather than pessimistic and right.»
In a world where most would
rather be known as a leader
than a manager, there's a lesson to be learned from Ma's
philosophy.
We believe that applying the open source
philosophy to our patents will strengthen
rather than diminish Tesla's position in this regard.
Hedgeable offers this service, but the company's
philosophy is that it's better to minimize losses from the outset
rather than use the losses to your advantage.
While Microsoft's device has full Windows functionality, Samsung's
philosophy is much easier to buy into after having used the Note Pro — these hybrid devices are indeed tablets first and PCs second,
rather than the other way around.
Still, Betterment's
philosophy is that REITs and commodities held on their own —
rather than within an ETF — could overexpose your portfolio.
It's a
philosophy that makes you more of a partner in your wealth management,
rather than simply a client.
Though these times are frustrating for our shareholders — and, remember, that includes all of the portfolio managers — these periods of weak performance have been opportunities for additional investment
rather than reasons to give up on our investment
philosophy.
Dave Ramsey's
philosophy is that starting with your smallest debt helps you get a fast psychological win that motivates you to keep going,
rather than getting bogged down.
If you are trying to convince those who are believers that they should not believe, your efforts are futile since we know not to let anyone take us captive through hollow and deceptive
philosophy which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world
rather than on Christ.
â $ œDonâ $ ™ t let others spoil your faith and joy with their
philosophy, wrong and shallow answers based on manâ $ ™ s thoughts and ideas
rather than what Christ has taughtâ $ (Col. 2:8)
«See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive
philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world
rather than on Christ.»
Col 2:8 See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive
philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world
rather than on Christ.
@ lionlylamb: per rightly dividing the word... the video below is what Paul was talking about (focusing on Christ), not philosophical abstractions... «See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive
philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world
rather than on Christ.»
To me, it is a trait of humanity,
rather than of one specific
philosophy or theology.
Colossians 2:8 See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive
philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world
rather than on Christ.
The title of this essay is meant to be
rather startling, and more startling
than the phrase «Christian
philosophy» which provoked no little controversy some few years ago.
Based upon the information in this story, I believe that he probably should have become a college professor of
philosophy rather than a preacher.
However, in this attack it appeals to postmodern
philosophy rather than to ancient wisdom.
I do not know who these
rather shell - shocked former practitioners of identity politics might be or what makes them into people who could be receptive to the lessons embedded in Moses Mendelssohn's
philosophy of religion and who could apply them to religions other
than Judaism.
She did mention in the video that even her atheist friends were telling her that her
philosophies were actually more Christian
than atheist, so I
rather think she was latently religious all along, sort of like gays who live for years in hetero relationships, then finally realize what they are, after years of saying something else.
Let God through His word and by His Holy Spirit teach you the truth
rather than believe the deceptive
philosophies of man.
Yet it is surely a sign of the impoverishment of common culture and the common good — and an index of the degree to which liberal order has succeeded in establishing itself as both — that we are virtually required to equate love of country with devotion to the animating
philosophy of the regime
rather than to, say, the tales of our youth, the lay of the land and the bend in the road, and «peace and quiet and good tilled earth.»
Any one, therefore, holding a religious
rather than a materialistic
philosophy, will think of the process of Biblical development as dual — seen from one side, a human achievement; seen from the other, a divine self - revelation.
The fourth theme in the literature comes from
philosophy and theology
rather than from education.
Bertalanffy and Laszlo are unfamiliar because they represent a relatively new school of
philosophy which takes its insights from the theoretical perspectives of contemporary science and technology
rather than from the mainstream of professional
philosophy.
Whitehead's
philosophy requires a broader conception of time, for example, one which will allow for the reality of the past in the present, a concept that the traditional metaphysician would likely judge as intuitively false, leading to the additional judgment that much of human experience is appearance
rather than reality, a position which we reject, having come to a greater understanding of Whitehead's metaphysics.
This emphasis on talking about change
rather than actively trying to implement it runs directly counter to Dewey's insistence that the
philosophy of education is «ultimately the most significant phase of
philosophy.»
Whitehead's
philosophy, of course, differs in many important respects from the Aristotelian view, as is to be expected in a
philosophy that takes activity
rather than matter as fundamental.
I'd
rather be an ignorant Christian
than a hateful person of a different faith or
philosophy.
All of these principles of good manners in play comport best with a
philosophy of life guided by devotion to worth,
rather than with an acquisitive
philosophy.
Further Lucas has examined my argument and evidence that part of Russell's constructive metaphysics was a
philosophy of events and process, and had this been elaborated,
rather than only the epistemology of Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits, there could have been a collaboration in a cooperative Process and Reality.
... Thus personal minds (each with its history of experiences) and enduring bodies finally appear in the
philosophy of organism, but as variable complexes
rather than metaphysical absolutes.
The
philosophy of absolute idealism, so vigorously represented both in Scotland and America to - day, has to struggle with this difficulty quite as much as scholastic theism struggled in its time; and although it would be premature to say that there is no speculative issue whatever from the puzzle, it is perfectly fair to say that there is no clear or easy - issue, and that the only obvious escape from paradox here is to cut loose from the monistic assumption altogether, and to allow the world to have existed from its origin in pluralistic form, as an aggregate or collection of higher and lower things and principles,
rather than an absolutely unitary fact.
But in spite of the intractable controversy over it, this fifth line may turn out to be the most fruitful approach of all for process thought (admittedly giving
philosophy rather than history the central voice), even though some will say it is «unhistorical.»
The book marks his movement politically toward pragmatic liberalism of the Franklin D. Roosevelt types and philosophically toward irony
rather than tragedy in his
philosophy of history.
Rather than leaving this as an uninvestigated discovery, as scientific reductionism and materialism would have us leave it, the Holy Father invites us to remit the question to those areas of study which have the appropriate competence, which comprise human subjectivity and creativity within their appropriate object: namely
philosophy and theology.
His idea of a «new synthesis», proposed mainly in his book Catholicism: A New Synthesis and developed in his many theological and philosophical essays, was an attempt to grapple precisely with the issues we have spoken of: the post-Cartesian «turn to the subject» (that is: the loss of faith in the objectivity of knowledge and the subsequent exclusive concern of
philosophy with the self and the subjective idea as the norm of «truth») and the
philosophy of evolution with its implications for a dynamic
rather than a static universe.
In this regard Hartshorne's attachment to the virtue tradition is closer to that of G. H. Von Wright, who was insistent that the path to virtue is never laid out in advance, and to that of Lester Hunt, who claims that thought and emotions are fused in virtues
rather than thought controlling emotion as an alien, recalcitrant subject matter.6 In the terms of Hartshorne's process
philosophy, and of his Peirceian pragmatism7, a person's principles are seen in his actions just as in Hartshorne's metaphysics universals are embedded in the world of becoming, as Aristotle and Plato (correctly read, according to Hartshorne) have also indicated.
Philosophy,
rather than science, is the final battleground in the evolution debate, at least insofar as that debate becomes a struggle between naturalism and supernaturalism to have the final say on man's status.
His doctrine of two separate substances, extended matter and thinking mind, each sort of substance requiring, with God bracketed out of the picture, nothing other
than itself in order to exist,
rather unceremoniously threw mind, that is, distinctively human being, out of nature and left
philosophy with the hopeless task of trying to figure out how a mind outside of nature, a mind not of nature, could ever really come to know nature.