Not exact matches
In one public TV program, [the activists] stated that they would
rather see animals
live than save one
human life...
The
human desire to be perfect means we push God to the side, opting to tap into our own limited power resources
rather than drawing from the fountain of
life.
In language that hinted at what was to come, it declared: «We believe that planned parenthood, practiced with respect for
human life, fulfills
rather than violates the will of God....
Maybe have a little humility and admit you can't understand,
rather than pretend you can demolish — in your mind — a
human legacy that has endured through thousands of years and continues to this day to inspire and transform people from all walks of
life and faiths.
Believe it or not, a true Muslim (the one who surrenders to the Will of his Creator) would
rather die but not to keep silent about the disrespect of God's Words which take place at a country that had enough of disrespect to
human life for more
than a decade of aggression and atrocities.
In
human history, the actual
living out of marriage as a lifelong union has been the exception
rather than rule.
One might go further and point out that the concept of «person» helps us understand
human dignity as something deriving from the fact of one's intrinsic being»
rather than from the extent of freestanding autonomy, the «quality of
life,» that a person might demonstrate.
«Whatever insults
human dignity, such as subhuman
living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery... the selling of women and children; as well as disgraceful working conditions, where men are treated as mere tools for profit,
rather than as free and responsible persons; all these things and others of their like are infamies indeed... they are a supreme dishonour to the Creator.»
We look for Christ within our
human lives rather than try to leave our
human lives to be with Christ.
Education today in the industrial environment and in the political and cultural environments consists of how to ensure that the
human resources (since both you and I are now reduced to being
human resources
rather than human beings) can be trained on a continuing basis, throughout our
lives, to be recycled at the right moment, to be a profitable
human resource?
The other group sees
human beings as part of the interconnected web of
life, and it sees value in the whole
rather than in its isolated parts.
Rather than staying becalmed in the sacristy, the sanctuary, and the presbytery, the clergy of his day, he urged, should lead a demanding, Gospel - centered
life of proclaiming the Word and celebrating the sacraments, nourishing their people with the tangible realities God had entrusted to
human hands as pathways to the Trinity: the Bible and the Eucharist.
They have been led by experience to conclude that the only power in
human life able to counterbalance the dark and divisive faiths of our time is a still stronger faith, a faith concerned with Reality
rather than human wishes.
Only so is God able, through sharing our
human flesh in the Incarnation, to impart eternal
life to that flesh,
rather than succumbing to our death and being extinguished by it.
Good
lives are made
rather than found, he insists, simply because without overriding values for
human life, the possibilities of a good
life are highly variable.
Christians often argue that, as in
human life the most adequate form of communication is by personal meeting
rather than the written word, so God's fullest revelation also needed to be a
human life.
Everything in the Jewish and Christian understanding of God would be lost if God were thought to be a static and inert being
rather than the
living deity who acts in nature, history, and
human experience.
How a
human life could be considered so worthless as to kill it
rather than allow someone else to care for and love the child is beyond my comprehension.
Rather than viewing it as a decision made for the sake of
living a
life free from the world's demands, Augustine agonized over the «evils» of sexuality in a doctrinal context that virtually denied the
human capacity for free moral decision.
Care for the Earth has been placed firmly in the context of preserving
human life rather than standing alone as an independent value.
Thus Santayana's earlier work consists in philosophical comment on
human life rather than constructive metaphysics or ontology, while Whitehead's is devoted to the foundations of mathematics and the analysis of scientific concepts.
When
human beings are looking to each other as models of being, the pathway of
life is a treadmill or squirrel cage
rather than an actual road.
The gospel insists that
human beings are the greatest good, and that everyone's needs are best met when we
live in community, caring for each other
rather than looking out for Number One.
Genesis also affirms the fundamental value of each
human life, our essential equality as
human beings, and our interrelatedness with nature,
rather than television «s view that young, white, unmarried males are somehow given a position of power considerably «above» females, older people, and minorities.
Admittedly, in the area of religious faith and morals we have been
rather slower to discard the old in favour of the new, for this is the aspect of
human life in which conservatism has always been most strongly entrenched, for the very good reason that man looks to this area of
life more
than any other for his stability and security.
Why did God think it better, to facilitate communication among men and women, for them to
live in small huts on a
human scale, with windows and streets,
rather than on information superhighways?
That is, when men had learned to understand God as a person and his will as a body of moral teaching, they continued to recognize his supreme importance for
human life, but his actual present effectiveness became a matter of belief
rather than of immediate apprehension.
In sum, because it treats belief as an atomistic decision taken piecemeal by individuals
rather than a holistic response to family
life, Nietzsche's madman and his offspring, secularization theory, appear to present an incomplete version of how some considerable portion of
human beings actually come to think and behave about things religious — not one by one and all on their own, but
rather mediated through the elemental connections of husband, wife, child, aunt, great - grandfather, and the rest.
Without such norms, the result is tragedy
rather than the enhancement of
human life.
Rather than giving up when our hard work fails to result in perfection or to accomplish our goals, we are able to see that improvement in justice or compassion or social conditions can make a difference in the
lives of our fellow
human beings that really matters.
The
human mammal would
rather not think of itself as little more
than an animal so we go off to the religion of
life called OZ.
The chief points of change are, first, that the scene has been transferred from the supernatural world of the gods to the earthly sphere of
human history; secondly, that It is not a god who experiences the renewal of
life (for the God of Israel is not himself subject to death and resurrection, but on the contrary initiates and controls these events) but the people of Israel, who look in hope for restoration when their existence is threatened; and thirdly, that this hope is expressed as a metaphor describing the historical future,
rather than as a myth of cosmic renewal.
They come from many lands; and they do not mean at all by those words that our worship is unrealistic or unconnected with daily
living; they mean,
rather, that in participation in that worship they have had a glimpse of something transcendent, more
than merely
human or natural, something able to give them a lifting of spirit and a deepening of their appreciation of
life's significance.
A man who is utterly self - contained and whose chief ambition is to be «self - existent» and hence to exist without dependence upon relationships of any sort, is a man whom we regard as an unpleasant if not vicious specimen of the race; and it is odd that deity has been regarded, and this even in Christian circles, as more like such a self - contained
human being
rather than as like a man who in every area of his
life is open to relationships and whose very existence is rich in the possibility of endless adaptations to new circumstances.
And it is for that reason that when we ask our question about the value of religion for
human life, I think we ought to look for the answer among these violenter examples
rather than among those of a more moderate hue.
Such a commitment to Jesus amid the claims and counterclaims of a secular society needs to be understood
rather than disparaged, and, if possible, directed toward a larger vision of Jesus and his message for the totality of
human life.1
Yet we are all
human beings
living together, religion is just one more to separate us
rather than to unite us.
You would do better to fear,
rather than to judge, from your limited
human perspective, the One, true,
living God of the universe.
This trust in
life and the actual experiences which it entails are part of
human existence that can be far better explained, as Birch and Cobb affirm, by an ecological model
rather than an older mechanical one.
That God's love, manifest in diverse ways throughout the duration of the universe, might come to a full and unsurpassable self - expression in an individual
human being who
lived and died in the Middle East almost two thousand years ago does not seem incongruous with what we now understand about the nature of an evolving universe, especially if we regard religion as a phenomenon emergent from the universe
rather than just something done on the earth by cosmically homeless
human subjects.
Jesus Christ, is and it will be forever more the unique object lesson of
living, the
human being not ever, although we may be Christians we don't leave of to sin, for the very her writing she says Aerquémonos confiadamente at the throne of your handsomeness in order to reach forgiving in order to the perpetual help, in as much as not tenemos one God which not it can feel pity for of we,
rather one which fué tempting all over, but without sin, according to the letter at the age of Hebrews, and the apostle John she says, whether various hubiere sin, solicitor tenemos in order to with the parent to Jesus Christ the that's right, not ever not any
human being it will be the best object lesson not other
than The Christ Jesus, nor Buddah bo Mahoma nor none, we don't follow to humanity
rather at a God which fué tempting all over but without sin, not ever we owe put her scope in the humanity not other
than in the.
Do not our congregations expect from their own ministers that they wrestle honestly and immediately with the Christian faith and the issues of
human life, and preach from that inner encounter
rather than give a digest of what other ministers have said?
Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but,
rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any
human being's
life -[the
life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise
than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.»
This is neither a sentimental platitude nor a rigid doctrine, but a plain observation regarding the material and social economies that make it possible for us to
live in a fully
human,
rather than bestial, way.
Some theologians insist that for the
life beyond the grave we must use the word resurrection, as the Bible usually does,
rather than immortality, lest we arrogantly claim it as a
human right.
Rather than negating all previous forms of the Word, new manifestations of the
living Christ in
human history always have an essential and positive connection with the Word which was in Jesus.
Genesis also reminds us forcibly that sin is an inescapable part of
human life, and that sin has its roots in our determination to do what we want to do
rather than to
live in harmony with the world as God wants us to
live.
There is an interconnectedness of all things, the unity of the universe is organic
rather than mechanical, all fundamental entities from atoms to
humans contain
life.
The people who speak most often about the sanctity of
human life should have been the very first to champion the right of people with AIDS to adequate healthcare
rather than lobbying against government expenditure for AIDS research, as did the Moral Majority.
They are: rationalization, which tends toward sterile intellectualization and robs
life of its character and vitality; estheticism, which cuts off true communication by maintaining an esthetic distance in order to dominate,
rather than to support, others; capitalism, which tends to deper - sonalize people by providing for their hedonistic needs in order to support production and consumption regardless of its
human utility; and nationalism, which tends to make national things sacred and in doing so to create idols out of them.31.