Sentences with phrase «rather than scientists»

Nikola Tesla claimed that relativity was something whose «exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists,» yet relativity has also been demonstrated.

Rather than scientists demanding real data, everyone has been drawn into the alarmists» fight, where scientific certainty WILL NEVER HAPPEN.

@Joshua Yes, given that it was in the SUMMARY for policy makers it isn't that suprising that the detail of the credible interval was simplified in that way for policymakers rather than scientists.

What interests me is the current discussion feels like politicians slamming each other rather than scientists analyzing a problem («this is all a hoax» — because scientists love secret meetings to fool the public; or «you're a denialist» — because Holocaust imagery is always in good taste).

Others have said essentially the same since then, but these have been principally politicians, such as Al Gore and Bill Clinton, rather than scientists.

Oh, BTW, one of the reasons he likes skeptics rather than scientists is because they're nicer, and hardly ever rude.

In the 16th and 17th centuries, it became an «intellectual fad,» he said, for thinkers to cite ancient Greek and Roman sources rather than scientists of the Middle Ages.

Without oversight, Tilghman argued, it's easy for PIs to see and treat their graduate students as laborers rather than scientists in training.

This painful experience convinced me I was going to be a clinician rather than a scientist, and I approached my clinical training accordingly.

In these moments it is truly a story of one writer's trip down the alimentary canal, rather than a scientist's analysis of it.

With the eye of an artist rather than a scientist, Strüwe recorded the formal genius of Nature in all her glory, revealing the glorious rhythms, patterns, and shapes that are both biological in design and captivating in aesthetic.

If instead you attempt to simply discredit them through name calling or are dismissive of the questions they ask you become a religion and zealot rather than a scientist.

Not exact matches

Or in other words, rather than assume that walking while thinking splits your mental and physical resources, leaving less to devote to each, the scientists actually found «an increase in arousal or activation associated with physical activity... which then can be invested into the cognition,» according to the paper reporting the research.

Whether you're a boss, an entrepreneur, a scientist, or a mentor, you have to look at your weakest moments as opportunities rather than limitations.

«We have seen little impact on pricing so far, but the airfare market typically takes weeks rather than days to react,» said Patrick Surry, chief data scientist at Hopper, in a research note.

This changes a lot of what scientists thought they knew about how water bears deal with radiation, as they were previously thought to have proteins that repaired damaged DNA, rather than proteins that halt damage altogether.

The scientists behind these studies all seem to agree on the answer: rather than view narcissism as an evil to be always avoided, organizations should strive to understand that small doses of the characteristic are often inseparable from high achievement and make rational cost - benefit analyses.

Meanwhile, a wide array of scientists and experts have come to the same recommendation — intense work liberally sprinkled with breaks to increase output — through research rather than athletic metaphors.

(The reason for growing the organ within a rat rather than a mouse was that the scientists needed to produce enough insulin - producing cells to reverse diabetes» effects in mice.)

They restrict rather than expand readership, say scientists.

Scientists believe scientific results because objective evidence confirms rather than denies an idea.

Unless you want to give up your computer, internet, electricity and modern medicine, you should be very happy that scientists search for real knowledge rather than settling on «invisible friends who do magic.»

The criteria read as though a committee made up of transgender lobbyists, rather than medical scientists, had compiled them.

I believe I would rather put my faith in God than I would scientists.

He pointed out how, because of the dominant reductionist view of human nature, scientists are increasingly tempted to treat the human individual as «an object to be investigated, measured and experimented upon» rather than as an «irreducible subject».

Like the religious objectors, scientists wishing to separate faith and reason — a minority, but a noisy one — claim that nature, which they often think of as self - subsistent rather than as created, can not be reconciled to God, whose existence they often deny.

It isn't true that scientists are trying to change the beliefs of others, but rather they are observing and testing natural phenomena with tomes of evidence telling the rational person that the notion of a deity as a NATURAL being rather than SUPERNATURAL one is absurd and silly.

I have much more respect for someone who owns up to that rather than trying to convince me and everyone else that there is evidence for creation, geologic evidence of a worldwide flood, scientists are part of a conspiracy, evolution is a faith etc. etc. etc..

Isn't a bit just as zealous as a creationist that tells you creationism is fact, to force an absolutely unproven theory, with zero physical evidence as scientific fact, rather than a wild theory that many scientist desperately hold onto?

Some evolutionary social scientists refer to our species as «the moral animal,» which I suppose means that we have the potential to reflect on the affects of our behavior rather than simply be blindly driven by survivalist insticts.

Indeed it has not been unknown for scientists to resist new theories on grounds which derived from the new form of dogmatism rather than those which belonged to experimental science.

Dawkins was also well known by the public as a great scientist, though his true talent was in communicating scientific ideas in books such as The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press) rather than in his actual research.

Scientists campaigned successfully for civilian rather than military administration of atomic energy.

A large part of the difference between scientists and the general population may be due more to religious upbringing, rather than scientific training or university pressure to be irreligious, although these other possibilities should be further explored.»

The truth in which it was interested was primarily the personal knowledge of God, persons, values and meanings, rather than the objective knowledge of the scientist.

Hence, we now know that the universe is expanding more rapidly rather than slowing as the «scientists» concluded.

We can fail to realise the quite different aspect the Universe bears when we try to think of it as a process and a progress upwards from primitive beginnings; some scientists consistently ignore this much more important mental process which is synthesis rather than analysis.

Scientists oriented toward socialism or Marxism (e.g., Bernal, Needham, Haldane) have complained that within capitalism the direction of science has been determined by corporation profits rather than the public welfare.5 The solutions they offer stress political controls, which run the risk of imposing particular ideologies on the structure of science.

The biology teacher, Scopes, whose trial for teaching evolution played so dramatic a role, was an active Methodist supported by fellow church members rather than an anti-Christian scientist.

Anyone who would rather listen to a Priest than a Scientist needs a serious talking to.

When you are done wasting time reading Lewis try reading Neil Degrasse Tyson, or Dawkins... real scientists, with real facts rather than opine like Lewis.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

Hippodamus's problem, Aristotle seems to indicate, was that he reasoned in politics as a kind of mathematician or rationalist, rather than as a political scientist.

A new theory from New Scientist has found that women who suffer with HG are more likely to have girls rather than boys.

Scientists believe this decline shows that men are biologically «hard - wired» to care for offspring, rather than paternal care being a purely a cultural phenomenon.

The relationship between sleep and ADHD is considered by scientists to be «complex and bidirectional,» meaning that it's possible the symptoms of ADHD (and the drugs that treat it, which are, after all, stimulants) may sometimes cause sleep deprivation rather than be caused by it.

However, as any good social scientist will tell you, outliers often obscure trends rather than indicate them.

The shape of the creature's 36 - centimeter (1.2 - foot) snout, which points straight forward rather than slightly downward like today's river dolphins, suggests the mammal spent most of its time at sea and likely fed on fish, the scientists say.

Those proposals were scuttled by their astronomical estimated costs, combined with the perception that they were boutique projects serving just one subsection of scientists rather than the astronomy community as a whole.

But rather than wishing the public understood and calling for more education, scientific organizations and individual scientists must take a more personal and proactive interest in reaching out to the public, he said.