The Baltimore school board voted this week to revamp the district's funding formula, choosing to provide extra dollars to schools on the basis of student poverty
rather than standardized test scores.
Some teachers, for example, might prefer using a portfolio of student work to demonstrate academic progress
rather than a standardized test score.
Not exact matches
The latest round of state
standardized academic
test scores showed gains both across New York State and locally.But
rather than celebrate the largest bump since New York adopted new
tests tied to the Common Core Learning Standards, education officials reported the increases with caution.
The idea of authentic assessment — evaluating children based on an in - depth examination of their work
rather than their
scores on
standardized tests — goes back a century, to the beginnings of the progressive education movement.
Incidents of tampering with a set of
standardized tests were probably the result of intra-office quarrels
rather than an attempt to get away with inflating
scores, according to an independent investigation into the suspicious
test results at Beacon Hill International School in Seattle.
Some teachers expressed misgivings about the use of raw
standardized test scores rather than value - added ratings.
As reported in today's CTMirror, it wasn't even two hours after Governor Malloy signed the «education reform» bill into law before the three groups representing the school superintendents, principals and school boards went back on their word, claiming that the new law gave them the right to implement policies that student's
standardized test scores can account for 50 percent of a teachers evaluation
rather than the 22.5 percent that was listed in the draft bill and agreed to by all of the parties last January.
So, in the minds of the education reformers, the definition of «
rather than focusing on mandates from bureaucrats,» is to mandate yet another set of
standardized tests that will be given to all students, starting in middle school and then throughout high school, and then using the
test, which has shown NO statistically relevant improvement as one - quarter of the entire «School Performance
Score» that parents and policymakers are supposed to use to determine which schools are succeeding and which schools are failing.
Perhaps most important, states now have the opportunity to use a framework of indicators for school success that is far better aligned with the skills and knowledge students need to be successful in college, career, citizenship and life,
rather than default to
standardized test scores.
Rather than using only
standardized test scores to calculate a school's letter grade, the new letter grade ratings will also consider how
scores for subgroups of students
scores change over time, as well as graduation rates and Advanced Placement
test scores.
Governor Malloy's education reform initiative requires teacher evaluation programs to be linked to
standardized test scores despite the fact that
standardized tests scores are primarily influenced by poverty, language barriers, and the lack of special education services for students
rather than teacher performance.
These models, which consider student growth on
standardized tests, fall roughly into four categories: «value - added models» that do not control for student background; models that do control for student background; models that compare teachers within
rather than across schools; and student growth percentile (SGP) models, which measure the achievement of individual students compared to other students with similar
test score histories.
Issue # 2: Governor Malloy's education reform initiative requires teacher evaluation programs to be linked to
standardized test scores despite the fact that
standardized tests scores are primarily influenced by poverty, language barriers, and the lack of special education services for students
rather than teacher performance.
Rather than use the event to congratulate each other on the destruction of our public schools, Connecticut's elected officials should be explaining to Duncan that the Common Core and Common Core
Testing scheme is a fiasco that needs to be repealed and that Connecticut must be allowed to develop its own effective teacher evaluation system that doesn't rely on the use of unfair, inappropriate and faulty
standardized test scores.
«Multimetric accountability systems should use formative assessments, evidence of student learning, and progress toward personal growth objectives to measure student and teacher success
rather than rely on
standardized test scores as the primary reference point.»
NEW YORK — As different states seek their own methods for evaluating a profession whose job security has long been determined by experience
rather than performance, New York State is moving to develop tougher criteria for teachers that would give state
standardized test scores more weight.
Rather than look at your credit history — which may be short depending on your age, or nebulous depending on such things as identity theft — UpStart calculates credit worthiness based on your career (for example, a lawyer is deemed more credit worthy
than, say, an actor), your educational status, your job status (obviously, if you're employed, you're more credit worthy
than someone who isn't) and
standardized test scores to determine if you're worthy of a loan from them.