Sentences with phrase «rather than warm water»

Not exact matches

-- soak them in warm water for about quarter of an hour or so and it'll soften them up a treat, and you can use the water for binding I'm about to make these with a slight twist of ground almonds rather than walnuts.

After reading the directions for use carefully, I tried this and it worked: Fill your pot with water to allow it to warm up with something in it rather than empty.

This easy recipe uses warm water rather than cold.

It should be thawed and warmed with warm water rather than in the microwave.

The ever - fresh system features an evaporation - condensation cycle that eventually returns the clean water back into the wipes rather than you adding water into it to keep the wipes warm.

When using tap water for baby formula, always use cold tap water that has run for 15 to 20 seconds rather than warm or hot tap water.

Examples of barriers to breastfeeding include placement of the stable, healthy, full - term newborn on an infant warmer immediately upon delivery rather than skin - to - skin with the mother, provision of infant formula or water to breastfed newborns without medical indication, removal of the newborn from the mother's room at night, inadequate assurance of post-discharge follow - up for lactation support, and provision of promotional samples of infant formula from manufacturers.

Many clouds at mid-latitudes make rain by freezing water into ice crystals (which fall from the cloud then melt before they hit the ground), rather than by coalescing warm water droplets together.

Calves born in these warm waters, where they feed exclusively by nursing, can put their energy into growing rather than into keeping warm.

That means that as these glaciers retreat, their fronts will remain in contact with warm ocean water that melts ice, rather than hitting higher ground anytime soon.

Europa is now thought to have an global ocean of salty water or slush rather than warm convecting ice below its icy crust (more).

In the absence of an external atmospheric pressure, the warming of water ice transforms it into directly into gas phase rather than liquid.

Scientists already know that receding sea ice allows solar energy to warm exposed water rather than reflect back into space, but blooms of algae could make matters even worse.

Ayurvedic science recommends consuming only room temperature or warm beverages, which means that ice water can become an occasional indulgence rather than a regular practice.

Rather than tossing it right into the garbage can, remove this product residue by soaking your brushes and combs in a basin of warm water with 1 teaspoon of baking soda for about 20 minutes.

I finally decided that rather than dipping my toes only to recoil from the icy waters, I would jump in, warm up and swim around a little.

The American Water Spaniel takes a while to warm up to new people and strange dogs, and is more of a one - family dog who would rather wait and see than rush in to make friends.

Use warm water and a sink or basin rather than a bathtub will keep the dog more confined.

Oh, one other note: the hot tub isn't «hot»... rather it's a smaller pool with slightly warmer water than the pool.

However, the mix of cool and warm has completely unbalanced Gill's picture, not least because the water should now be reflecting blue rather than the yellow and pink of the original sky.

Heat can change ocean dynamics and eventually will increase glacial melting, which is mainly responding to subsurface water rather than air warming.

I'd rather deal with the problems of farming in a warmer climate — including bugs and water shortages — than I would with the problems of farming under ice.

Off the coast of Washington we also see shifts in fish species for probably different reasons than the Bering Sea, i.e., warm waters moving north, rather than changes in primary production (but both likely related to anthropogenic climate change).

The air can only warm as a result of the water freezing if the rate of energy loss from the air suddenly decreases while the water is in the process of freezing — but this is very much the exception rather than the rule.

While such a «missing heat» explanation for a lack of recent warming [i.e., Trenberth's argument that just can not find it yet] is theoretically possible, I find it rather unsatisfying basing an unwavering belief in eventual catastrophic global warming on a deep - ocean mechanism so weak we can't even measure it [i.e., the coldest deep ocean waters are actually warmer than they should be by thousandths of a degree]...

One would get some water vapor in the atmosphere, but liquid water on the surface would be rare - probably more due to volcanic activity rather than sunlight warming surface.

While there has been warm water building up in the pacific, and this warm water is highly correlated to El Nino, and most of the models suggest there will be an El nino (because of these observations rather than any form of «forecast skill»), that does not mean 2014 will be an El nino.

The changes in community composition were up to five times more extreme in drier rather than wet habitats, suggesting that water availability will play a strong role in what types of bugs will succeed in a warming Arctic.

Rather than questioning the primary role of the atmospheric CO2, our modelling results allow us to put forward that the atmospheric CO2 is not the whole story and that, owing to the overwhelming effect and interplay between the paleogeography, the water cycle and the seasonal response, the climate system may undergo subtle climatic changes (as the 4 °C global warming simulated here between the Aptian and the Maastrichtian runs).

Ocean oscillations and currents could (and do) cause local effects as warm and cold water interchanges, but they can not cause a global effect as they just move energy around rather than increasing it.

Oh, and he never could answer the questions about Venus and Uranus, or produce a study showing water vapour warms rather than cools.

As written above, it is natural that lands warm (cool) faster than seas: but, I think, it would be much better for studying GW (there are many other issues for lands even without GW) to point on waters rather than on inhabited lands (with a simple condition: all waters; not saying that Arctic pack is decreasing, making silence on Antarctic pack because it instead doesn't fit AGW theories).

The fact that the actual measured planetary warming is less than the lowest IPCC model prediction warming and is found only at high latitudes (which is not predicted by the IPCC models) logically supports the assertion that the planet's response to a change in forcing is to resist the change (negative feedback, planetary clouds in the tropics increase reflecting more sunlight in to space) rather than to amplify the change (positive feedback) due increased water vapour in the atmosphere.

And here is the thing, rather than that ice melting in the warm water, the open water between the ice actually freezes, creating a larger ice sheet.

However, since this cycle takes hundreds of years, it could be that the current slow and small change in pH in the near surface waters since 1700 is due to the Medieval Warm Period rather than human co2 emissions.

So if on shined that laser on a square meter for say 10 mins then the 1 mm depth of square meter could warm by about 1 C. Rather than water one could also heat up anything with a thin surface [and assuming one reduces the heat loss] So thin sheet of paper which absorbs [has heat capacity of whatever wavelength one is using could heated within mins of exposure.

Recently there's been research on a 2nd flavor of El Niño, called El Niño Modoki, which has the warm water focused on the central Pacific, rather than the «classical» eastern Pacific.

Of course, if the air were to be warmer than the ocean surface then evaporation would take the extra energy required from the air rather than the water and that 1 mm deep layer (0.3 C cooler than the ocean bulk) would rise to the surface and dissipate but that doesn't happen often or for long.

Only during the short periods around noon on sunny days — when the skin layer is warmer than the water below — is there any point in worrying about how long energy from DLR remains in the skin layer and what fraction is lost upward rather than downwards (warming the ocean).

Rather than this happening, the ocean may eventually warm more at the surface raising the global water vapor amounts.

gnomish says: April 8, 2012 at 8:55 pm (Edit) maybe the co2 came out of the cold polar waters when it warmed rather than from the warmer equatorial ones that were already depleted?

Because the temperature gradient in a planet's troposphere is the state of thermodynamic equilibrium which the Second Law of Thermodynamics says will evolve, the planet's supported surface temperature is autonomously warmer than its mean radiating temperature, so warm in fact on Earth that we need radiating gases (mostly water vapour) to reduce the gradient and thus cool the surface from a mean of about 300K to about 288K, this being confirmed by empirical evidence (as in the study in my book) which confirms with statistical significance that water vapour cools rather than warms, all these facts thus debunking the greenhouse conjecture.

«''» Earth that we need radiating gases (mostly water vapour) to reduce the gradient and thus cool the surface from a mean of about 300K to about 288K, this being confirmed by empirical evidence (as in the study in my book) which confirms with statistical significance that water vapor cools rather than warms, all these facts thus debunking the greenhouse conjecture.

Sea ice in the Bering Sea this winter was said to be the lowest since the 1850s, largely driven by persistent winds from the south rather than the usual north winds although warm Pacific water was a factor early in the season (AIRC 2018).

[32] Therefore, the overall result of large blooms of coccolithophores is a decrease in water column productivity, rather than a contribution to global warming.

If we consider Sandy as a late season storm that anomalously strengthened in mid-latitude waters rather than weakening or dissipating, an effect that seems to trap damage from most late season tropical storms down in the Gulf, then the destruction north of Cape Hatteras from Sandy might be entirely owing to global warming, not just 20 % as the Trenberth quote suggests.

In fact, hurricane activity is more related to the difference in temperatures between the cold and warmer waters, a difference AGW theory says should decrease rather than increase.

Presumably, much of this water will fall as rain somewhere, so it would probably be more logical to guess that warming would cause more rain rather than less.

That warming extends the 50 m or so to the seabed because we are dealing with only a polar surface water layer here (over the shelves the Arctic Ocean structure is one - layer rather than three layers) and the surface warming is mixed down by wave - induced mixing because the extensive open water permits large fetches.

And washing clothes in warm or cold water rather than hot will save 500 pounds.