Congress, then, also did not attempt to define «religion»,
rather it used that
term to refer to certain
undefined beliefs (it them becomes the court's job to define the
term, relative to the act).
The language of «principles» as opposed to «policy» or «practice» clearly suggests belief
rather than conduct, and the upcoming educational (CPD) requirements, on equality, diversity and «inclusion» (the latter being a
term that is
undefined in the case law but which has variously been defined by the Working Group (in the report) as «making a better space for everyone» and (on the definitions website) with reference to RBC's corporate policy — which we can celebrate as the first time that a corporation's principles have been incorporated by reference into legal requirements!