Sentences with phrase «rather vague statement»

Apparently, when Koh was asked about the roadmap of Samsung for its hardware releases, he gave a rather vague statement that somehow alluded to a shift in focus when it comes to releasing new technology.

Can we go beyond this rather vague statement and use the LGM to say which of the many models is most likely to have the right climate sensitivity?

As for availability, Ford Performance says that «the Ranger Raptor is set to turn heads throughout Asia Pacific and around the world» which is a rather vague statement to say the least.

Can we go beyond this rather vague statement and use the LGM to say which of the many models is most likely to have the right climate sensitivity?

Not exact matches

So far, however, quantitative statements about their level have been rather vague.

Oyster's explanation is rather vague and ambiguous; the post reads more like a plug for reading on mobile phones than a business closure statement.

This is a very important question that deserves some logic - based discussion, rather than the vague general statements that we so often read on the internet.

This is a rather vague and subjective statement - very low relative to what?

Rather than giving these vague statements, can someone please provide us with the exact statements that were made on these in AR4 and the exact statements that are made in AR5?

This is an incredibly vague statement; but part of the difficulty with this problem, which also exists in one form or another in many other famous problems (e.g. Riemann hypothesis,, P = NP, twin prime and Goldbach conjectures, normality of digits of Pi, Collatz conjecture, etc.) is that we expect any sufficiently complex (but deterministic) dynamical system to behave «chaotically» or «pseudorandomly», but we still have very few tools for actually making this intuition precise, especially if one is considering deterministic initial data rather than generic data.

Thus, all the statements regarding economic modelling and damage estimates are very much hedged and often rather vague.

Employers are looking for solid examples of operations and management skills, rather than empty statements and vague promises.

Objective statements are often very vague and focus on the candidates requirements from the position rather than show what they have to offer the company.

Your cover letter should feature concrete details about why you are qualified for the job rather than vague statements about your interest and abilities.

First, staff members are careful to use effective instructions — that is, instructions that are specific, clear, and able to be carried out by the child (e.g., «stand quietly in line» rather than a vague statement such as «be good»).