Not exact matches
Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble, score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming from Henry.He should
rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would
fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are
watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!
he tried to rectify the mistake of our defence by coming out bt
failed on second goal no - one would expect that 3 defenders would stand and
watch a player of zarate quality to take a shot... it was more of our defence fault
rather than his..
In postgame remarks following Chelsea's F.A. Cup match against Norwich City, Conte repeatedly called Mourinho a «little man,» a «fake,» clarified that he meant to say Mourinho might be suffering from amnesia
rather than dementia though still said Mou needs to
watch out because his memory appears to be
failing regularly, and not - so - subtly threatened to beat his ass when they see each other at the upcoming Chelsea - United match next month:
«On his
watch we have an environment secretary who doesn't believe in climate change, our carbon emissions are rising
rather than falling and the government has
failed to set a target a clean up our power system by 2030.»
Powered by brilliant performances from Maxine Peake and its young leads (Molly Windsor, Ria Zmitrowicz and Liv Hill), it's an unpleasant and effecting
watch, but succeeds largely due to the sympathy and and focus it places on the victims
rather than the abusers — something that time and time again, the media
fails to do.
My view is that in the face of very ignorant journalistic nonsense, too many scientists are
failing to maintain their research objectivity and argue against alarmist or foolish interpretations (such as the obvious alarmist tone of AIT) I see good scientists lining up ideologically
rather than methodologically, and find this painful to
watch.