When it comes to
rating corporate debt there are a lot of customers.
«Many investors are interested in high credit quality bonds, but the supply of AAA -
rated corporate debt in the U.S. is very limited,» said Michael L. Sapir, Chairman and CEO of ProShare Advisors LLC, ProShares» investment advisor.
Recent reports from rating agencies state that as much as USD 4 trillion [3] in U.S. -
rated corporate debt is set to mature through 2020.
This data represents the ICE BofAML US High Yield Master II Index value, which tracks the performance of US dollar denominated below investment grade
rated corporate debt publically issued in the US domestic market.
Not exact matches
Fill the bulk of your portfolio with a combination of high -
rated bonds (weighted toward
corporate, rather than government,
debt) and high - quality, dividend - paying equities, and you likely won't take a hit.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin talks to Squawk Box's Becky Quick, Joe Kernen and Andrew Ross Sorkin about reducing the
corporate tax
rate, raising the
debt ceiling and improving the economy.
But low interest
rates, at least in Canada, have pushed household
debt to such vertiginous levels that officials like Carney know they shouldn't be counting on consumer spending to drive the recovery — ergo, the call for more
corporate investment.
Moreover,
corporate America has been dependent on low
rates to finance the trillions of
debt issuance it has taken on during the era of zero interest
rate policy, or ZIRP.
«Broadly, China is making progress in controlling its
debt in various parts of the economy,» said Christopher Lee, managing director in the
corporate ratings group and chief ratings officer for Greater China at S&P Global R
ratings group and chief
ratings officer for Greater China at S&P Global R
ratings officer for Greater China at S&P Global
RatingsRatings.
The result in the early 1980s when
debt - leveraged buyouts really gained momentum was that financial investors were able to obtain twice as high a return (at a 50 %
corporate income tax
rate) by
debt financing as they could get by equity financing.
«Since June 2010, Gross has been reducing the $ 245 billion fund's vulnerability to interest -
rate swings and increasing its reliance on credit quality by shifting from Treasuries to
corporate and non-U.S. sovereign
debt, a strategy that backfired last month,» according to Bloomberg.
Some examples: in the presence of full expensing, a
corporate rate reduction has no effect on the cost of capital for equity - financed investments and raises the cost of capital for
debt - financed investments.
Unhedged foreign currency
debt, as was prominent in 1997, means that a fall in the currency pushes up
debt servicing costs for the government, local
corporates and banks, but a rise in interest
rates to assist the exchange
rate has the same adverse effect.
In the presence of
debt finance, textbook analysis would suggest that a cut in the
corporate tax
rate would raise the cost of capital because interest deductions would no longer be as valuable and thus discourage investment.
We suspect that much of the projected growth benefit from
corporate tax reform comes from enacting expensing of equipment, which reduces the entity - level effective tax
rate to zero on equity - financed investment and makes it negative if financed in part with
debt.
Hope for positive effects from interest
rate cuts, versus continued deterioration of
corporate earnings and employment, as well as sudden concern over the
debt problems in Argentina (which we noted in early May).
The Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value — weighted index of investment - grade fixed -
rate debt issues, including government,
corporate, asset - backed, and mortgage - backed securities, with maturities of one year or more.
The Bloomberg Barclays U.S.
Corporate High Yield Bond Index covers the universe of fixed -
rate, non-investment-grade
debt.
Represents the
corporate and government - related sectors of Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index (which provides a broad - based measure of the global investment - grade, fixed -
rate debt markets) and is considered representative of global investment - grade
debt.
Our Global Market Strategies segment, established in 1999 with our first high yield fund, advises a group of 46 active funds that pursue investment opportunities across various types of credit, equities and alternative instruments, including bank loans, high yield
debt, structured credit products, distressed
debt,
corporate mezzanine, energy mezzanine opportunities and long / short high - grade and high - yield credit instruments, emerging markets equities, and (with regards to certain macroeconomic strategies) currencies, commodities and interest
rate products and their derivatives.
The only variables he admits are structure - free: The federal government can indeed spend more and reduce interest
rates (especially on mortgages) so that the higher mortgage
debt, student
debt, personal
debt and
corporate debt overhead can be afforded more easily.
Interest
rates remain low,
corporate balance sheets generally remain strong and
debt - service costs appear manageable.
What if, they wonder, rising
rates make all that
corporate debt look less attractive and spur a selloff?
All told, though, the plan is, like its House counterpart, a proposal to dramatically slash
corporate tax
rates, open up a big new loophole for wealthy individuals, and pay for the cuts by dramatically expanding the national
debt and ending a number of tax deductions that could leave a substantial share of middle - and upper - middle - class people paying more.
Unfortunately,
corporate debt relative to U.S. GDP has now returned to prerecession levels, a risk made even riskier by rising interest
rates.
Emerging markets
corporate debt is a maturing asset class of which around 60 % is
rated investment grade.
The job growth is fake, there's been no wage growth since 1999, inflation numbers are false, government
debt is too high,
corporate profits are too low,
corporate profits are unsustainably high, companies aren't reinvesting their profits, companies are buying back too much stock, the Federal Reserve is propping up the market, the Federal Reserve is keeping
rates artificially low, and so on.
We note that in this cycle, riskier companies have led the pick - up, hence defaults in the weaker segment of
corporate debt could rise as real
rates climb above neutral.
You'd think that
corporate debt would grow in proportion to total sales, as this additional
debt is used to fund investments in productive activities that create more sales and contribute to the economy, and that higher sales, and presumably higher earnings would create a proportionate increase in the value of the company, and thus in its stock price, and that they all go up together, not in lockstep but over time more or less at the same
rate.
Legg Mason plans to close a deal this month to restructure $ 650 million in
debt, a move designed to lock in favorable interest
rates for the long term while taking advantage of the market's sustained appetite for
corporate bonds.
Similarly, in the country, the ultra-rich pay - off the politicians and then extract the wealth via different mechanisms such as money printing, bond - price (interest
rate) fixing,
corporate tax holidays, and excessive executive compensation while the nation's balance sheet is laden with
debt.
With
corporate leverage, too little makes you a takeover target, and too much means bankruptcy when
rates rise and you can't roll the
debt.
Thus, even as longer treasury yields quit rising, the market
rate on
corporate debt starts soaring, often quite dramatically.
Although the largesse is restricted to blue - chip eurozone companies such as food producer Danone or telecoms giant Telefónica, ECB - injected liquidity has spilled into the rest of the market, paring average interest
rates on investment - grade
corporate debt by some 30 basis points to an even 1 %, Deloitte estimates.
Posted by Nick Falvo under
corporate income tax,
debt, deficits, economic growth, fiscal policy, income tax, interest
rates, monetary policy, progressive economic strategies, public services, taxation.
Delaying the
corporate - tax -
rate reduction was one of many tough choices Senate leaders made as they tried to craft a bill that would lower taxes but also add no more than $ 1.5 trillion to the
debt over 10 years.
Since 2010, U.S.
corporate debt has been growing at an annualized
rate of more than 5.5 %.
They bought enormous amounts of mortgages and other
debt instruments, and they drove down interest
rates to virtually zero to ensure that the large investment banks and financial institutions survived — forcing retail investors to participate in high - risk securities such as equities and
corporate debt instead of stashing their money in banks.
In every economy, very low interest
rates and unending credit supply have loaded up the marginal borrower —
corporate and individual — with unsustainable
debt.
Some concerns surround US dollar - denominated
corporate debt, which has risen steeply over the past two years in emerging markets to benefit from low US interest
rates.
Corporate gearing ratios remain conservative by historical standards and
debt servicing costs remain low, reflecting the relatively low level of interest
rates.
With interest
rates on low - risk investments falling to low levels in many countries, investors have sought to maintain yields by moving into higher - risk assets such as
corporate debt and emerging market
debt.
Debt - burdened American
corporates (and, to a lesser extent, European companies) are sailing into headwinds from the US Federal Reserve, which finally started hiking interest
rates last December.
For roughly three decades, U.S. non-financial
corporate debt as a percentage of U.S. nominal GDP and the high yield default
rate moved in tandem.
Strong profitability, low interest
rates and a
debt burden well below historical peaks have all tended to hold down the interest burden of the
corporate sector: as a share of gross operating surplus, net interest paid by the
corporate sector remains well below historical averages.
Thus, I believe the Fed's articulation of a lower terminal policy
rate in the longer run is much more important for the mortgage markets and for
corporate capital expenditures financed through the
debt markets than is a modest increase in short
rates.
The Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets USD Aggregate Index is a flagship hard currency emerging market (EM)
debt benchmark that includes fixed and floating -
rate U.S. dollar — denominated
debt issued from sovereign, quasi-sovereign, and
corporate EM issuers.
The BAA spread refers to the yield on
corporate bonds above the
rate on comparable maturity Treasury
debt, and is a market - based estimate of the amount of fear in the bond market.
So far, September 2016 has been touted as the taper date for QE, but Soc Gen think the ECB may have to venture into buying lower -
rated government
debt and even
corporate debt if growth and prices continue to disappoint.
The Bloomberg Barclays Long - Term Government /
Corporate Bond Index is an unmanaged index that includes fixed -
rate debt issues
rated investment grade or higher by Moody's Investors Services, Standard & Poor's Corporation, or Fitch Investor's Service, in order.