Sentences with phrase «rational arguments against it»

... «See, no one has any rational arguments against it!»

In addition to the rational arguments against polytheistic worship, the Qur» an points to the unanimous testimony of the prophetic traditions.

This is done in an attempt to make people who have rational arguments against church doctrine and church history seem irrational and therefore making their arguments invalid.

rather than have a rational argument against the idea I expressed, some people can only correct spelling mistakes — thats because they have no rational argument.

There is no rational argument against the introduction of safe standing in Premier League stadiums.

Not exact matches

Some conservatives tried to fight back against Trump, pleading with their audiences to see what they contended to be the rational point of view, but their arguments seemed to go unheard.

In fact, two gems from Pascal's Pénsées would make for perfect epigrams with which to begin and end Kugel's book: «The eternal silence of these infinite spaces frightens me» (which sums up his argument about the absolute «smallness» and «silence» that circumscribe our existence and lead us to transcendence), and, «The heart has its reasons, which reason can not understand,» (which sums up his argument against rational reductionism).

@Sigh: attempting to make rational arguments gets tedious when it amounts to beating your head against a brick wall — it tends to make people irritated and impolite.

Alas, I am somewhat aware of these atheists against whom, I'm afraid, no rational argument would do any good.

Yes, there is an argument for increasing capacity, but as the NAO found, long distance inter-city journeys for the business elite (and MPs of course) is not where any rational person would chuck at least # 50 billion to start the fight against crush - hour conditions.

The Orthodox church in Greece protested loudly against the removal of religion from the ID - card, and yet I can not find any rational argument supporting their actions other than trying to hang on to the privileged position of that church and its followers in the Greek state - effectively hanging on to the ability to treat non Christian Orthodox citizens as lesser citizens.

This is not a debate between rational scientists and some well meaning group of honest skeptics who use honest logic and honest reason to formulat honest arguments against the science.

The guy simply seems unfit to lead a rational debate; if his paper were published, no matter if it remains uncited or it is rebutted, he would be able to show it up as a refereed publication; he might even demand that a 2nd paper of his be published with his arguments» against the rebuttal etc..

The arguments raised against such a concern by advocates for geoengineering research often include ones from three groups: first, largely semantic objections to the term «moral hazard»; second, arguments that taking on more climate risk would be the rational response; and third, claims that experience with the adaptation debate somehow disproves the effect.

Matt Ridley in the Rational Optimist make a good defence of the word «progressive», and an argument against reactionary movements like environmentalism, especially Malthusian.