Sentences with phrase «rational people do»

Sorry, rational people don't see it that way.

All rational people don't like nuisance dog barking.

Rational people don't take sunk costs into consideration when they make decisions!»

A sense that politics shouldn't be so different from the rest of life, where rational people do somehow find a way of overcoming their disagreements.

- the ones that always «forgive» lol) have a problem with homosexuality which most rational people don't have; so is it such a BIG issue that they don't allow certain people in their homes?

I don't think he / she uses the same dictionary most rational people do.

Wait a minute... Educated, smart, intelligent, logical, rational people DO NT believe in God and uneducated, naive, irrational, dummies DO believe in God?

Who cares what Jesus would think, honestly... Any rational person doesn't think this way, why does the media even entertain this rediculous thought process of religion?

Common Cause executive director Susan Lerner said that «any rational person doesn't believe these things happen in isolation,» and said there are «inherent conflicts of interest, either in campaign contributions and taking other money from entities who want something from state government.»

But the real meat of the story might be how religion and the need to belong to something can make the most rational person do horrible things.

Not exact matches

Lacking a leader, «it's hard for me to be optimistic or pessimistic because I don't know if they're going to open the floodgates and take a lot of risks to rush the technology out — or if they're going to take a reasonable, rational pathway to protecting people,» said David Friedman, director of cars and product policy and analysis at Consumers Union.

Of course, fear isn't rational — you don't see people giving toaster ovens the side - eye, and many other things that people are afraid of, including public speaking and spiders, are unlikely to harm you either.

But when you claim that you've «beaten» your main competitor, Lyft, and say that an additional service will be more expensive and you hear that people don't trust you anymore because things keep changing and they can't make rational plans, getting angry and blaming them isn't the solution.

Behavioral finance is a fairly new term and area of research that surfaced when researchers realized that investors, people who make otherwise rational decisions throughout much of their life, do not make rational decisions when it comes to money.

We will continue to see over-funding of late - stage venture financings until the bloom comes off the rose and then I predict rational non-VCs will return to their day jobs chasing returns in other corners of the financial world and we people who only know how to do venture will continue doing just that.

No rational person facing a liquidity crunch will keep spending and living like they once did.

«Rational arguments do not convince people who have emotional biases about something.

People who work with a financial advisor feel more confident, they save more, they take action (and don't procrastinate retirement planning) and they make rational moves with their money.

People don't always make rational decisions when it comes to money.

They're doing what any rational person would do who wanted something but couldn't get it - won't let anybody else have it either.

Or perhaps I simply realize that many of the so called rational atheists who post on CNN are dedicated to reason only as long as it supports their positions and when it doesn't immediately switch to ad hominem attacks to try to get people to ignore the legitimate point that was made.

But just because these domestic terrorists try to instill fear of rational people into their idiot audiences, doesn't make them right.

thank you for stating what any rational person would consider obvious (but these religious organizations do not)

Chris, do you realize now that your faith is irrational and that rational people have no need for faith?

«do it by force»???? Atheists tend to be pretty rational, reasonable people who are also non-violent.

@BoldGeorge — So a woman hit's a child and uses the «My hands are so weak I can barely hold a bible» defense when any rational person would know gripping strength in your hands has nothing to do with your ability to swing them at a child.

What you say does nothing to invalidate my point, which is that when people believe in the supernatural they'll attribute phenomenon in the real world to with even though they have no rational reason to do so.

@ shieldofgrace You do realize to rational people YOU are in the «same category as scientologist.

I didn't say people's faith should be based on this, but since you brought it up, if a religion teaches it's followers God answers prayer and someone never has a prayer answered any rational person would question why his religion is teaching him something that doesn't seem to be true.

Its called fuzzy logic, the idea that since people are rational but almost always don't have all the necessary information to make a perfectly logical conclusion, the resulting truths are always assailable.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

On the other hand, he would worry over the competing desires corporations and governments face that might lead to a kind of rational planning that does not see human persons as a whole.

On the other hand, the «supra - rational» faiths often do not commend themselves to people of liberal intelligence nor lend themselves to ready communication to unbelievers.

This is understood to be rational behavior, and if people are not behaving «rationally» economists encourage them to do so.

They believe that most people should be rational & realize the extremists do not encompass / represent all Muslims.

I do nt want to end up being like you, a drone who looks incredibly silly to rational thinking people speaking on and on about their invisible man even in situations where its simply not wanted or warranted.

If you feel that people who follow science would be rational and peaceful you don't understand Humanity.

All it takes for a Christian to ruin the life of another person is for rational people to do nothing.

Thornton, for example, does not envisage change or development in God, whereas I postulate that the three divine persons undergo change in their relationships to one another as a result of their involvement with their (rational) creatures.

Just don't be under the illusion that it convinces a rational person.

Do you have any idea at all how absolutely retarded you religious wackos seem to normal intelligent rational thinking people?

Isn't it funny that when God tells a person to do something rational, everyone considers it the truth and the person completely sane, but when God tells a person to do something irrational then the person has mental health issues.

Most «atheists» are actually closer to agnostics, rational, scientifically minded people who will not believe based on faith but proof; those that arent are generally teenagers trying to rebel and not even doing self - examination and soul - searching.

If heroes and gods of myth as well as comic book characters have powers similar to those of Jesus, where does the rational person draw the line?

This does not mean that a person can not have a rational understanding of Christianity or of what the Bible teaches apart from the illumination of his or her mind by the Spirit.

Before telling me, like most christians do, that I don't know what I speak of, do note that as a Recovering christian I have a very good idea as to what I speak of and any rational minded person see's the belief for the true horror it is.

If you want to convince people of the truth of Christianity, the best way to «argue» it today is not through reason and and rational propositions, but by becoming more and more like Jesus in everything we do.

It does make Christians look bad and I have never seen a group of people who were more rational and down to earth.

I guess if you don't have a rational argument you can only threaten people who disagree with you.

Why do rational people believe the words of a book when there is no evidence?