Rational people know better.
Perhaps given the scorching heat the Common Core has been taking lately, most people didn't expect the administration to make the move so soon, but
rational people knew it would eventually come.
it appears they are interchangeable, but most
rational people knew that anyway)....
Not exact matches
Lacking a leader, «it's hard for me to be optimistic or pessimistic because I don't
know if they're going to open the floodgates and take a lot of risks to rush the technology out — or if they're going to take a reasonable,
rational pathway to protecting
people,» said David Friedman, director of cars and product policy and analysis at Consumers Union.
The smarts - dominated leader is
rational, makes decisions based on facts, sets goals, delegates responsibility and
knows how to hold
people accountable.
We will continue to see over-funding of late - stage venture financings until the bloom comes off the rose and then I predict
rational non-VCs will return to their day jobs chasing returns in other corners of the financial world and we
people who only
know how to do venture will continue doing just that.
FLANNERY: I think, fundamentally, you
know, my belief is over time,
people are
rational about what is in their collective best interest.
Rational people already
knew that no wall is going to stop anybody, as many migrants simply use tunnels.
I have met God and
know him and so have numerous
people other
people I have talked to so my
rational thought is telling me to go with what I
know is true.
To tell someone that they deserve to go where the worst
people in the world go when they die is still insulting, even if you're
rational enough to
know such a place is a fairy tale.
I prefer to think of
people as
rational until they open up their mind and let me
know of the goofy magical things they feel proud to «believe in».
No
rational person, including atheists would claim we
know every thing about the universe there is much to learn and will always be so.
Consider the «
rational atheists» Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, and a dozen lesser
known atheist tyrants who are responsible for the deaths of over 250 million
people in the past 100 years.
@BoldGeorge — So a woman hit's a child and uses the «My hands are so weak I can barely hold a bible» defense when any
rational person would
know gripping strength in your hands has nothing to do with your ability to swing them at a child.
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he
no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become
rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can
no longer countenance religious
people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)
I'm not saying the unnecessary suffering of animals is good, or moral, but rather pointing out that your perspective on the subject is
no more
rational,
no more based on fact, than that of the
people you are arguing against.
To «
rational minnesota»... Without any doubt, any
person who has ever had a true spiritual encounter, they
know that the encounter was «spiritual» and not natural.
Now, I
know the vast majority of adherents to religion are good decent,
rational people.
Before telling me, like most christians do, that I don't
know what I speak of, do note that as a Recovering christian I have a very good idea as to what I speak of and any
rational minded
person see's the belief for the true horror it is.
We would not willingly choose such a
person,
no matter how
rational, as a friend, companion, or guardian for them.
Most Jews, like most
rational persons,
know that their personal identity and their ethnic identity are not one and the same.
Obviously the only
rational explanation is that an all
knowing and all powerful being, who is invisible and who requires that
people worship it at the penalty of eternal punishment just puffed everything into existence.
According to Murdoch, the thoughtful modern
person can
no longer conceive of men and women as
rational creatures who are slowly expunging evil from their midst; instead, it is necessary to think of human beings as «benighted creatures sunk in a reality whose nature we are constantly and overwhelmingly tempted to deform by fantasy.»
Everyone loves him, and he is even more popular then ever even though every
rational thinking
person knows the truth about Santa.
apparently you don't
know much of definitions (PLURAL) of
person...
persons are nOT always considered human beings... One of the definitions you will find in the dictionary of a
person is «a self conscious
rational being»... that is not exclusive to human beings
A supposedly
rational person would
know this already.
As far as we
know the
rational opening to the truth about all being appears only in
persons experiencing the joy of
knowing with each other.
It's only recent that their bigotry is
no longer accepted by
rational people (and for the sake of this argument that includes moderate christians).
Do you think a
rational, intelligent
person can
know that the God of Israel is real?
i remember saying as much way back when we were stil top and playing well, a certain
person on here, by the name of THE ANALYZER took my head off and said I should take my «negativity» elsewhere, until that day I never
knew been
rational, frank and realistic equates to been «negative»....
Regular
people can't be expected to
know enough about the details of say TTIP to make any kind of
rational judgment anyway.
What we do
know is that it includes
people who no
rational person would consider an extremist.
It apparently didn't have the effect we wanted it to have, but it was a little
known part of the effort that
people who worked at Los Alamos put into trying to get a
rational decisions made about where we go from here.
Even though
people's
rational, conscious mind «
knows» that they are unhealthy, some other part of the brain seems to disagree.
That's the way most
people have been taught and all they
know about anything sexual — a tingling in the groins that if you allow yourself to feel (and enjoy) you'll lose your
rational mind and when you die, you'll go to hell and burn in a big fire.
«We've been so successful because we only deal with
people we
know are level - headed,
rational, and ready for a relationship,» Feargal said.
They very crafty and
know the power of emotional strength
people put into online relationship — unfortunately the
rational part of the users brain is somehow overruled by the need to be loved, and this is where vulnerability takes place.
I'm
known to be a warm, caring, friendly, family oriented and
rational person.
And
no matter how good of a friend and
person I am I am unable to make better decisions without the love and consideration from an objective and
rational, hence healthy individuals consideration for my best interest.
Hope to meet someone special here... Lets see what happens... Looking for honest, respectful, kind hearted
person... Someone who
knows how to be fair, reasonable and
rational... They want me to keep writing more here....
The
rational solution is to get to
know these performers as
people and
no longer be afraid of them, then in time, come to accept them.
There is no
rational reason for this system to be revived and there are oligarchs, and
people at Goldman Sachs, and
people in the US government and military that
know this.
So I don't
know, I kind of see the kobo
people as the good guys, because of their partnership with the independent bookstore,
rational price... I don't like the super aggressive attitude of amazon, but again Amazon gives you the feeling that if you don't find it in Amazon, you can not find it anywhere else, which is probably true, and that is a good feeling and add to that their books are the cheapest.
I
know economists like thinking that
people are
rational actors and efficiency maximisers, but we aren't.
When a new
person would come into some position of power that we had never dealt with before, we would ask others who
knew him better, «Is he economically
rational?»
It's a fascinating field that shows that
people aren't perfectly
rational with money, so we often spend money when we
know we should save it.
Behavioral economists have
known for a long time that
people are not completely
rational beings and that behavior plays out in the financial markets, where we see evidence of herding behavior, speculation and mania.
The example was used to show how irrational some clients can be; even when your returns are in the top 1 % of all investment managers out there, some
people can still find something to complain about (as an aside, that is why the truly successful mutual fund managers quickly exit the public domain once they have made «enough», and then they tend to go super private by either managing their own money or investing privately on behalf of some particular clients that they
know to be
rational — when you're worth tens and tens of millions of dollars, you don't need to deal with
people that don't truly believe that good value investing often means underperforming the S&P 500 at least one out of every three years).
Larry Swedroe is the author of Wise Investing Made Simple (2007), The Only Guide to a Winning Investment Strategy You'll Ever Need (2005), What Wall Street Doesn't Want You to
Know (2000),
Rational Investing in Irrational Times — How to Avoid the Costly Mistakes Even Smart
People Make Today (2002), and The Successful Investor Today: 14 Simple Truths You Must
Know When You Invest (2003), and co-author of The Only Guide to a Winning Bond Strategy You'll Ever Need (2006)(All Affiliate Links).
American politics can
no longer necessarily be thought of as the community of speaking and
rational peoples.