Sentences with phrase «rational people understand»

Many of us enjoy James Bond, but rational people understand we need more than just his special car, and a decent gun, to become him!

brandongates, «In other news, rational people understand that they're not omniscient and that uncertainty isn't their friend.»

I submit to you that rational people understand the best way to reduce uncertainty absolutely is not to build more Modulz, but to stop cranking the control knobs of the real system with reckless abandon.

In other news, rational people understand that they're not omniscient and that uncertainty isn't their friend.

Thats actually OK, most rational people understand that people have their reasons for hating certain sports teams, players, or just like some car enthusiasts hate certain kinds of cars, its all good but at the same time when your attitude, history, or behavior demonstrates that you are completely one sided your opinion basicly is worthless to those seeking a fair assessment of a team, product, person or company.

Not exact matches

Sometimes we need to think outside the box to understand what drives people, and not just on a rational level.

The loudest factions of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest, which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open, honest, introspective and rational discussion between groups of people who share more in common than not.

It's just that anything people can not understand in their puny, primitive brains, is not open to rational consideration UNLESS they are willing to concede that some things are unknowable..

Mormonism gives «normal» Christians a good chance to understand how rational people view «normal» Christianity.

are people so simple they crave the misguided beliefs of others to feel better about themselves or are we triing to understand the lunacy of our citizens to believe something as pathic as a 3000 year old IDEA in order to act properly when voting in those who will run this country for the next 4 years a.k.a. voting in one who using rational thinking and logic to make choices!

Second, person is understood to have two aspects, the incommunicability of a rational supposit and the communicability of the relation of opposition which constitutes persons.

This is understood to be rational behavior, and if people are not behaving «rationally» economists encourage them to do so.

If you feel that people who follow science would be rational and peaceful you don't understand Humanity.

If you cling to the irrational belief that it's the literal word of a diety, and you read it and actually decide you want to follow it, be self - aware enough to understand when rational people question your morality and intelligence.

This does not mean that a person can not have a rational understanding of Christianity or of what the Bible teaches apart from the illumination of his or her mind by the Spirit.

If we then understood philosophy as committed to rational thinking, we could see its necessary irrelevance to considerations of both the human person and the divine Pperson and the divine PersonPerson.

It's easy to understand why the Roman torture device that is the symbol of a soon - to - be-marginalized religion is inappropriate in any monument set up by rational people.

In Love» s Knowledge and elsewhere Nussbaum uses the fiction of Proust, Henry James, Dickens, and others to buttress her claim that the emotions are not necessarily opposed to reason» that, in fact, a truly rational person will experience certain emotions as the consequence of proper understanding.

I understand anyone who hesitates to step into the path of their buzz - saw, but we just must find strong, rational people to lead.

Your reasoning is phenomenally inconsistent» @hippypoet» I am not taking anything on my understanding of the bible» @Chad «hmm, then how are you coming to the conclusion that the people of Jesus» day considered him rational and coherent?

Civil rights fights have always ended up in the court systems because too often the prejudice and hatred toward a minority group blinds people from being rational enough to understand the REAL facts.

The only * proof * a rational person needs to understand that there is no «God» is the fact that no one can rationalize what «God» is.

Whenever I debate a believer, in a calm rational debate it usually devolves into the person defending religion getting angry because he or she can not simply answer any question other than by saying stuff along the lines of, «well our brains are too small to understand» or «god works in mysterious ways» or my personal favorite «God will judge you for you unbelieving ways».

I am soooo bothered by this new information that I am struggling to understand how a rational person who is trying to teach her children integrity can conduct herself in such a way.

«I would hope that educated, rational people would make decisions and base their actions on factual information that they have obtained and have an understanding of...»

Upon these ethical revelations, it becomes rational to understand that a people who can not employ their inner potentials, for the productive advancement of their society, is not in anyway close to being educated.

Thayer set out to understand why people aren't always rational when making economic decisions and to design a model in which market outcomes consider human fallibility and cognitive biases.

i am an easy going, calm, rational person.i am naturally patient, understanding, and slow to anger.i am an upbeat, positive person.

I'm 5» 2», 105 lbs, attractive, outgoing, very happy person, rational, understanding, concern and care about others, sharing and loving to myself and others, live a heathy lifestyle, respect myself and others, like a man who respect ladies completely, I'm looking for a companionship, best friend...

Embedded with religious undertones, the people don't have a rational understanding of the creatures that dominate the landscape.

«Person - centered» Israel education is concerned with developing in individual learners the ability to understand and make rational, emotional, and ethical decisions about Israel, and about the challenges Israel regularly faces, whether they be existential, spiritual, democratic, humanitarian, national, etc..

In the end, let's just hope that any change is grounded in a rational understanding of people's right to own pets.

It's never, ever the game's fault, and that smacks of intelligent, rational game design from people who understand how to craft a gratifying experience.

Bottom line: I fully understand the need to «communicate» but I just want to remind people that if we want people to make rational assessments and come to a rational understanding of situations, and thereby make solid decisions, we can not just follow «communicators» guidelines because these are not about rationality.

Recognizing it is a CHOICE has important psychological and rational effects, the most important of which is to get people to understand the solution is in the mirror, not Washington, nor any other capital, legislature, etc..

Most people understand this, instinctively if not through rational thought processes.

We don't understand the climate, and you folks» claims that you do understand it well enough to make century - long forecasts just makes rational, reasonable people point and laugh.

What I can't understand is how anyone else would consider that person and that thinking to be rational.

[DC: I don't usually permit these sorts of patently false accusations, but I'm permitting this rant this one time, so that folks can understand what rational people are up against.

They literally can not believe they might be wrong about their future predictions — and can not understand how any rational person could not see the future with the same blinders they wear.

it's also fairly logical and rational, even for an ordinary person who isn't a scientist to understand that if polar bears need sea ice to hunt for seals and that sea ice disappears, then those polar bears are going to be in trouble

Rational Thinker Thanks for those links... I think most thinking people understand the so - called debate on the validly of Global Warming has nothing to do with a wish to find out the truth of the situation..

JS: And it's also fairly logical and rational, even for an ordinary person who isn't a scientist to understand that if polar bears need sea ice to hunt for seals and that sea ice disappears, then those polar bears are going to be in trouble.

I can not seriously believe that rational people can not understand how the greenhouse effect works any basic science readings will fix that issue up and you can avoid the whole climate change science go to a hard physics site.

You can not have a rational discussion with a person who believes that a process and approach that is well understood is absurd.

It's very hard for scientists to understand this, because they're highly rational people, but in actual fact, no - one has ever been rationalised out of a belief... http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2014/s3976695.htm

It's very hard for scientists to understand this, because they're highly rational people, but in actual fact, no - one has ever been rationalised out of a belief...

When I speak to liberal friends, rational, engaged, thoughtful people, they never seem to understand the science in any depth.

Stanley Milgram wanted to understand why so many apparently rational, kind, normal people got taken in by the unmentionable Austrian lance corporal.

How our courts have allowed this sickening destruction of families to continue is beyond any rational person's understanding.