Sentences with phrase «rational people who»

My experience has been that most counsel (and clients) in commercial disputes are rational people who try their best to resolve expensive litigation in the most cost - effective way.

OK, so you can't get your average WUWT sycophant to even read a few paragraphs into what DC documented here, but hey, what about rational people who actually give a sh # t?

Ive spoken to rational people who believe that «gun control is not the answer

This is an appeal to the rational people who have some sway with their children, siblings and friends.

The latest research suggests, for example, that the vast majority of terrorists are not mentally ill but are essentially rational people who weigh the costs and benefits of terrorist acts, concluding that terrorism is profitable.

I come from a family of very logical, rational people who are also religious, though not at all fanatical.

You can call me a coward and say I «ran away» or whatever your malicious, childish mind wants to make up to make yourself feel better, but I prefer to actually have adult conversations with rational people who can articulate their opinions based in reasonable, rational thought ========= Apparently, since you are still addressing me, I must be «adult» in my conversation and displaying rational thought.

You can call me a coward and say I «ran away» or whatever your malicious, childish mind wants to make up to make yourself feel better, but I prefer to actually have adult conversations with rational people who can articulate their opinions based in reasonable, rational thought.

Yes, that is obvious to any honest, rational person who has a clue about Christianity.

History deals with empirical facts of the human past that are accessible to any rational person who uses historical method.

Either as a rational person who can have a rational, intelligent debate, or as a childish bully who needs a good span - king.

I am soooo bothered by this new information that I am struggling to understand how a rational person who is trying to teach her children integrity can conduct herself in such a way.

They start with the belief that even a tiny baby is a rational person who can learn things, and one thing they can learn is how to sleep through the night.

Is there any rational person who believes Ms. Mitchell should be eligible for a state pension?

Thus, a rational person who reads this description would infer that a convention only involves costs — which mimics the message being promoted by legislative leaders and others who are leading the campaign to oppose a «yes» vote.

There is no rational person who would view the video above and think Dusty poses a threat.

There is no rational person who thinks that mercury pollution stops at state borderlines.

(At least from any rational person who is actually interested in knowing what is happening.

Icarus... your idea of «safety derived from momentum» is still lost on me... I can't see any rational person who is on the fence about bike commuting think they should give it a try because they can now roll through stop signs... if lack of leg strength (which is a problem I don't have) is one of the only arguments for passing such legislation... what are the odds such a bill is going to pass?

Is your ex a normally rational person who is just angry over a particular situation?

Not exact matches

Behavioral finance is a fairly new term and area of research that surfaced when researchers realized that investors, people who make otherwise rational decisions throughout much of their life, do not make rational decisions when it comes to money.

We will continue to see over-funding of late - stage venture financings until the bloom comes off the rose and then I predict rational non-VCs will return to their day jobs chasing returns in other corners of the financial world and we people who only know how to do venture will continue doing just that.

Behind Cadbury's simian success was an unlikely inspiration: Daniel Kahneman, a psychologist who won a Nobel Prize in 2002 for showing that people are not the rational agents that economists had thought they were.

«In my experience people who assert statements like that are often immune to evidence or rational argument, and envision themselves as superior beings who are more enlightened than the rest of us.»

Anyone like Kahneman who can provide some insight into why people are not rational and when that is most likely to happen, is a valuable resource for anyone in business.

«Rational arguments do not convince people who have emotional biases about something.

People who work with a financial advisor feel more confident, they save more, they take action (and don't procrastinate retirement planning) and they make rational moves with their money.

That is how us rational people feel when the candidates fight over who loves god more.

The loudest factions of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest, which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open, honest, introspective and rational discussion between groups of people who share more in common than not.

They're doing what any rational person would do who wanted something but couldn't get it - won't let anybody else have it either.

Or perhaps I simply realize that many of the so called rational atheists who post on CNN are dedicated to reason only as long as it supports their positions and when it doesn't immediately switch to ad hominem attacks to try to get people to ignore the legitimate point that was made.

Who cares what Jesus would think, honestly... Any rational person doesn't think this way, why does the media even entertain this rediculous thought process of religion?

I applaud the more rational people posting on this blog who have the patience to try and get these people to argue logically.

This is why arguments about what god wants are as discredited as arguments about who people were in their last life or what Xenu wants amongst the rational.

Secondly, any rational, reasoning person should and would never vote for someone like this — someone who looks to the supernatural for answers and guidance.

«do it by force»???? Atheists tend to be pretty rational, reasonable people who are also non-violent.

are people so simple they crave the misguided beliefs of others to feel better about themselves or are we triing to understand the lunacy of our citizens to believe something as pathic as a 3000 year old IDEA in order to act properly when voting in those who will run this country for the next 4 years a.k.a. voting in one who using rational thinking and logic to make choices!

Consider the «rational atheists» Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, and a dozen lesser known atheist tyrants who are responsible for the deaths of over 250 million people in the past 100 years.

History is full of people like yourself — yes intelligent, rational and logical — who dove into scripture to rip it apart and wound up being theologians and biblical scholars and Jesus followers.

Name - calling is also a sign someone is frustrated by people who refuse to be honest or rational.

I'll believe the rational thinking person who uses his critical faculties to deduce that all religions are a scourge on humanity and that NOT ONE of them has any basis in fact or reality.

To «rational minnesota»... Without any doubt, any person who has ever had a true spiritual encounter, they know that the encounter was «spiritual» and not natural.

fred, if you believe that Adam and Eve were actual people who talked to a snake and ate an apple, then you are disqualified from any rational conversation in the first place.

I do nt want to end up being like you, a drone who looks incredibly silly to rational thinking people speaking on and on about their invisible man even in situations where its simply not wanted or warranted.

If you feel that people who follow science would be rational and peaceful you don't understand Humanity.

Most «atheists» are actually closer to agnostics, rational, scientifically minded people who will not believe based on faith but proof; those that arent are generally teenagers trying to rebel and not even doing self - examination and soul - searching.

Those who think that human rights is a «motherhood issue» around which all rational people can unite have not given the question much thought.

Yet more evidence that religions (not faith mind you) is populated by ignorant people who would rather use their fears and insecurities to rule their decisions than rational thought.

so there is a logical rational reason for keeping two people who love each other dearly apart?

It does make Christians look bad and I have never seen a group of people who were more rational and down to earth.