Sentences with phrase «rational persons thinking»

Just considering bringing a new pup into your family can cause a normally rational persons thinking process to implode.

«A rational person thinking through this might say «I want them to take this money and spend it on programming, not on a gift,»» Meer said.

I don't see the point going on about the striker issue, flogging a dead horse in my opinion... if we did not get a striker in the summer why will any rational person think we will get one now?

What rational person thinking through the sequence of events above would think that he or she had what it took to win in 2020?

Not exact matches

Sometimes we need to think outside the box to understand what drives people, and not just on a rational level.

In particular, consider the following question: Can you think of a market in any item where each item was priced perfectly, so that every (rational) person agreed on its value?

Behind Cadbury's simian success was an unlikely inspiration: Daniel Kahneman, a psychologist who won a Nobel Prize in 2002 for showing that people are not the rational agents that economists had thought they were.

He said, bluntly, what any rational person would have been thinking for years.

FLANNERY: I think, fundamentally, you know, my belief is over time, people are rational about what is in their collective best interest.

«Is it rational if you've had an increase in equities for a single year to think your retirement prospects have exponentially increased Obviously, I would say not, but people have a tendency to extrapolate.»

When it comes to investing, people may not be as rational as they think.

As for the current market, I like to think that people are still rational in playing the gravity game with interest rates, albeit the recent optimism is slightly far fetched, but I think it's fine.

By replying to me and typing a counter arguement, a rational and thinking person will see those impliocations as things you have said.

I have met God and know him and so have numerous people other people I have talked to so my rational thought is telling me to go with what I know is true.

Newsguy: You have an imaginary friend... seems to the rational thinking person hat you are the one requiring help.

Who cares what Jesus would think, honestly... Any rational person doesn't think this way, why does the media even entertain this rediculous thought process of religion?

are people so simple they crave the misguided beliefs of others to feel better about themselves or are we triing to understand the lunacy of our citizens to believe something as pathic as a 3000 year old IDEA in order to act properly when voting in those who will run this country for the next 4 years a.k.a. voting in one who using rational thinking and logic to make choices!

I prefer to think of people as rational until they open up their mind and let me know of the goofy magical things they feel proud to «believe in».

An irrational atheist is a person that has not put rational thought behind their lack of belief in a god.

Most people are not particularly bright, or capable of rational thought.

People like you think we should all «seek» him, yet there is no rational reason to seek anything or have any idea where to seek.

But I would think that a rational, cool - headed person like you might enjoy exploring the history of mankind's responses to the enigma of existence.

A rational thinking person wouldn't believe any of those stories.

Think of it this way — would you, or any other rational person, accept the same arguments you strive valiantly to demonstrate your god, if it were any other claim?

You can call me a coward and say I «ran away» or whatever your malicious, childish mind wants to make up to make yourself feel better, but I prefer to actually have adult conversations with rational people who can articulate their opinions based in reasonable, rational thought.

You can not convince a person that rational thought is the highest authority without making a rational argument.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

You can call me a coward and say I «ran away» or whatever your malicious, childish mind wants to make up to make yourself feel better, but I prefer to actually have adult conversations with rational people who can articulate their opinions based in reasonable, rational thought ========= Apparently, since you are still addressing me, I must be «adult» in my conversation and displaying rational thought.

I'll believe the rational thinking person who uses his critical faculties to deduce that all religions are a scourge on humanity and that NOT ONE of them has any basis in fact or reality.

Of course I think a more rational approach is to simply view all those verses as written by mere people.

To the rational person it looks like you're not capable of thinking for yourself and that you're merely thinking on a 5 year old level.

Maybe I need to go back to college and take an «Advanced Religious Metaphor» class, because to a rational person that sounded like random words strung together without any form of logical thought.

Religion stunts a person's capacity to use rational thinking to solve problems.

In contrast to people in biblical times «modern man acknowledges as reality only such phenomena or events as are comprehensible within the framework of the rational order of the universe... the thinking of modem men is really shaped by the scientific world - view, and.

The kind of religion I'm up against is the kind that taunts and degrades people, attempts to control them, manipulates them and shames them, that limits rational thought, critical thinking and intellectual integrity, that demands blind adoration of empty leadership and unquestioning subservience.

I do nt want to end up being like you, a drone who looks incredibly silly to rational thinking people speaking on and on about their invisible man even in situations where its simply not wanted or warranted.

Do you have any idea at all how absolutely retarded you religious wackos seem to normal intelligent rational thinking people?

Despite this, I still believe in God because of some experiences I've had as a child... other than that, I think people should start considering things through a rational, scientific perspective.

Religious people may be mentally incapable of rational thought.

Acording to rational thinking people are only rational animals.

Those who think that human rights is a «motherhood issue» around which all rational people can unite have not given the question much thought.

I believe we are our brothers and sisters keepers and one could make the argument that it falls under the category of rational self interest; however, the minute people think they can enforce that philosophy at the end of a barrel of a gun (gov «t) the whole thing falls apart and religion becomes secular humanism where the state replaces God.

Yet more evidence that religions (not faith mind you) is populated by ignorant people who would rather use their fears and insecurities to rule their decisions than rational thought.

* sigh * As rational humans, I would like to think we all have the ability to put ourselves in other peoples» shoes.

If we then understood philosophy as committed to rational thinking, we could see its necessary irrelevance to considerations of both the human person and the divine Pperson and the divine PersonPerson.

I don't think he / she uses the same dictionary most rational people do.

Boy, with rational thinking, you can do what many religious people have done!

Nor would he allow persons in a coma, who are incapable of experiencing, or the feeble - minded elderly, who have an impaired ability for rational thought, to remain at the top of the continuum.

According to Hartshorne, «The only thing that the proposed form puts pressure on people to do, and that I think constitutes the essential element in rational procedure in metaphysics, is to face the dilemmas, trilemmas, or quatrilemmas that their beliefs or disbeliefs confront them with» (Foreword to Viney, Charles x).

That such people have any rational basis for their skepticism is out of the question, of course, and Dawkins tells us exactly what to think of them: «It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that).»