«People are not rational; they are
rationalizers,» Roberts says.
That's not an outcome
the rationalizers regret.
Because of such delusion, he is what is called a naive rationalist,
a rationalizer, or sometimes just a rationalist, in the sense that he believes that the reasons behind things are automatically accessible to him.
Therefore, there is a different and important answer to the issue raised here: that Dyson is not only pro-humanistic because people are part of nature, but that he also grasps that ecology is a field of scientific limitations (for example, see R. H. Peters, «A Critique For Ecology»), he rejects its religious rationalizations and
rationalizers.