Sentences with phrase «raw data from this study»

Democrats are further concerned about another provision, not included in earlier versions, that would give EPA only $ 1 million per year to implement the bill, which would entail, among other things, obtaining raw data from study authors.

Not exact matches

Greg Marcus, a cardiac electrophysiologist at UCSF who was involved with the Cardiogram study, said Apple benefits from the real - time access to raw data from its heart rate sensor.

We thank Gina Levy and Bill Shrapnel for making the raw data from their earlier study available (27).

They solicited raw data from dozens of scholars who have conducted research on the topic and then translated the data from 50 studies into the same mathematical format so that the findings could be statistically analyzed together.

MONSANTO, the giant of genetically modified crops, has for the first time been forced to release raw data from toxicology studies it carried out on three strains of its modified maize.

Democrats vehemently objected to the subpoena, however, arguing that making the raw data public would violate confidentiality agreements with study participants and subject the research to attack from representatives of polluting industries.

Smith, the senior Republican on the House of Representatives science committee, issued a controversial subpoena to EPA on 1 August for all the raw data from a number of federally funded studies linking air pollution to disease.

These didn't include raw data from either of the two major studies in question — one known as the Harvard Six Cities Study and the other by the American Cancer Society (ACS).

On 1 August, the panel voted along party lines to approve a subpoena for raw data from the Harvard Six Cities Study and an American Cancer Society study known as «Cancer Prevention Study II.&rStudy and an American Cancer Society study known as «Cancer Prevention Study II.&rstudy known as «Cancer Prevention Study II.&rStudy II.»

Yet, they'll scrutinize the raw data from the China Study to poke holes in it, or take the word of an English major who's done so instead.

I'm tempted to look into the raw data of the study, now available from Oxford University's web site [6], to see if the rest of the study is also supportive of our recommendations.

Their purpose is to take all the studies from both sides and lay out the raw data and present it.

(«Exam Performance» values are acquired from a regression model from the study and are not actual raw data.)

Commissioner Schneider has stated that his agency should not have initiated the study and NCES will in the future refrain from analyses of the raw data that it collects.

It seems that often when the results of research studies are reported in the general media and blogosphere, one nugget of a finding is presented as representing much more than could be reasonably taken from the raw data or the official report.

Anybody with an education in the sciences can tell when a credentialed charlatan is violating scientific method, «cherry - picking» data, manipulating computer simulations (climate models) to «draw the curve, then plot the points,» concealing his raw observational data sets from properly skeptical examiners, corrupting academic peer review (both to suppress the publication of colleagues» studies casting doubt upon the reviewing officers» pet hypotheses and to ensure that the submissions of «The Team» do not suffer impediments to publication), and concerting all these violations of professional ethical standards by way of back - room confabs and some of the most incredibly stupid e-mails this side of Enron's «Smartest Guys in the Room.»

Happer posed for a photo with Marc Morano and CFACT's Craig Rucker at the Environmental Protection Agency's headquarters the afternoon Scott Pruitt announced the «secret science» initiative that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from using any studies that do not make the raw data public.

Rucker posed with Will Happer and Marc Morano for a photo at the Environmental Protection Agency's headquarters the afternoon Scott Pruitt unveiled a «secret science» initiative that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from using any studies that do not make the raw data public.

The confusion resulting from skewing trends is summarized in a recent study that concluded their «results cast some doubts in the use of homogenization procedures and tend to indicate that the global temperature increase during the last century is between 0.4 °C and 0.7 °C, where these two values are the estimates derived from raw and adjusted data, respectively.»

That afternoon, Pruitt had unveiled the «secret science» initiative that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from using any studies that do not make the raw data public.

In Wang et al (1990) Wang and Karl concluded that over the 30 year period of their study (which used the same raw data from eastern China for the same period as Jones at al) ``... results suggest a general increase in heat island intensity of about 0.1 C, but this has not been constant in time.»

Speaking with E&E News, Milloy claimed that he had a key role to play in the «secret science» initiative unveiled by Scott Pruitt that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from using any studies that do not make the raw data public.

The researcher develops a detailed description of the people, events, or phenomena the researcher is studying.165 The researcher also generates perhaps five to seven themes or categories which constitute the «major findings» of the study.166 Current or former legal practitioners may find the process of moving from raw data to codes and themes similar to the coding of large sets of documents during discovery.

For the purposes of this study, the results from raw data that were collected through the questionnaires were analyzed.