Sentences with phrase «raw data observations»

Not exact matches

But CRU has struggled to respond to numerous requests filed under Britain's Freedom of Information Act that seek raw temperature data from weather stations, including observations obtained from other countries under promise of confidentiality.

Using a web interface, interested scientists can, for example, select objects from the raw simulation data, process it, and even create virtual observations mimicing existing or future space telescopes.

The death toll is 93 % identical to that in the WikiLeaks data, revealing those raw field observations to be far more reliable than researchers had suspected.

Right after a circle, it can be helpful to jot down observation notes in a listening log to capture raw data before it sifts through your brain.

Primary materials consist of raw data - such as original research reports, letters, writings, interviews, first hand observation, or scientific findings.

These data products are not just a function of the raw observations, but also of the assumptions and the «model» (usually statistical) that go into building the synthesis.

«His most startling observation came when he was asked how often scientists reviewing his papers for probity before publication asked to see details of his raw data, methodology and computer codes.

Steve, unfortunately for this station the raw data ends in 1984, so it's a bit hard to say much about a difference in slope between raw and adjusted data from 1970 - 1984 (I would have to do a significance testing to see if you even have enough data records for any slope to be significant for only 15 years of observations).

The most startling observation came when he was asked how often scientists reviewing his papers for probity before publication asked to see details of his raw data, methodology and computer codes.

The CONUS surface warming trend proposed by the Watts paper appears to be inconsistent with the satellite observations, and overall global trends in raw data do not differ dramatically from those in the adjusted data.

Adding more colder observations in recent years can't help but add a cool bias to the raw data.]

Adding more colder observations in recent years can't help but add a cool bias to the raw data.

Do the raw data figures in the paper include time of observation bias adjustment and / or any other similar «instrument» - like adjustments?

There are several factors that are important in monitoring global or U.S. temperature: quality of raw observations, length of record of observations, and the analysis methods used to transform raw data into reliable climate data records by removing existing biases from the data.

Copernicus's contribution concerned the Earth observation value chain: across two separate workshops audiences were able to see a progression from raw data and how to access it, to downstream uses of climate information for decision makers, commerce and end users.

Mr Jones: [«The most startling observation came when he was asked how often scientists reviewing his papers for probity before publication asked to see details of his raw data, methodology and computer codes.

As the trend in the US rural stations, which at least until very recently employed these min / max stations, has been from early evening observation (5 pm or 7 pm in most of the sources I've found) to early morning observation (usually 7 am), this has been presumed to put an artificial cooling bias into the temperature record, so a net positive, and increasing as more stations have been converted, correction has been added to the raw data.

For a station, when the time of observation is shifted from early evening to early morning, the number of «duplicate» minimum readings in the raw data should increase greatly if there is no other resetting.

I went to the raw source (http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/people/melvin/PhilTrans2008/YamalADring.raw) but the format is a pain as it will involve lots of manipulation to put it into a format I can more easily use e.g. observation [i] = -LCB- tree, year, width, age -RCB--- I didn't see age in the raw data, is age just set as the first year for which there is a reading for the tree sample?

The other observation is that the trend observed from homogenised data is higher than the trend you get from high quality raw data.

Am I correct, that in this case «raw» excludes corrections for time of observation bias, which the NOAA data includes?

I would clarify for the reader wither the USHCNv2 data used in the Fall et al (2011) data set, used in this study was the raw data or the intermediate data adjusted for time of observation.

For example, changes in time of observation, adjustment for a move of a station that was previously sited next to a heat source to a better location (that now allows the station to be classed as Class 1 or 2), switch to a different temperature measurement device or system, etcetera, could explain why smaller classes of raw data don't track well with the overall trend calculated from homogenized station trend data.

These surface networks have had so many changes over time that the number of stations that have been moved, had their time of observation changed, had equipment changes, maintenance issues, or have been encroached upon by micro site biases and / or UHI using the raw data for all stations on a national scale or even a global scale gives you a result that is no longer representative of the actual measurements, there is simply too much polluted data.

Observations trump models every time, no matter how much you try and manipulate the raw data.

A second point is that all these observation time series take raw data from the same air mass over the same period — they should give the same outcome.

From the context of relative comparison of temperatures from one period to another — it should be noted that «raw» temperature data are not pristine instrumental observations that are more «real» than the adjusted data.

All raw data, including but not limited to test forms, handwritten notes, scribbles in margins, records of telephone conversations, observations of parent - child interaction, observations of parent - parent interaction, consultations with other professionals, or any audio or video tapes must be saved and made available for review, if necessary.