The raw model output, without this «makeup» applied, is shown in «panel b» above.
Regarding the missing
raw model output data, I realise this is an important concern and am frustrated by the loss and not being able to check directly into the issues raised by Mr. Lewis.
Not exact matches
«And at the conclusion of our
modeling run, we have a multi-year data record of all of these important flooding variables — the
raw output is very large.»
NL: You say that «The
raw model simulation
output data are potentially available to test problems raised by Mr. Lewis.»
This includes
raw climate
model output, as well as
model output that has been processed by «bias correction» (removal of some known errors) and / or «downscaling» (addition of finer spatial detail).